The datum choice problem in Geodesy

Main Article Content

Ivandro Klein
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-592X
Vinicius Francisco Rofatto
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-7530
Marcelo Tomio Matsuoka
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-522X

Abstract

This contribution presents a theoretical review of the datum problem in Geodesy, inside the framework of the Gauss-Markov model. In this review, it is mathematically demonstrated that a solution with constraints is biased when the rank of the design matrix  is not full, i.e., . In other words, there is a rank defect in the design matrix due to the datum deficiency in the geodetic network, which generally occurs at least in terms of the origin. The minimum inner constraints are mathematically demonstrated through the conditions of no net translation (NNT), no net rotation (NNR), and no net scale (NNS). Furthermore, we provide a step-by-step S-transformation to change or update the datum from a minimally constrained solution to another. In particular, the cases of geodetic deformation analysis, where different observation epochs must be at the same datum, and the geodetic network densification based on pre-existing reference points are discussed. A simulated trilateration network demonstrates several possibilities for defining the datum matrix. Finally, comparisons were made between five different types of constraints in a levelling network: absolute constraint; weight constraint; NNT condition for all network points; NNT condition only for reference points and weighted or generalized NNT condition according to Kotsakis (2013). The results obtained by Monte-Carlo simulations demonstrate that the generalized NNT condition provides the best datum choice in the densification of geodetic networks problem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Geodesy

Author Biography

Ivandro Klein, Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC),

Ivandro Klein was born in Porto Alegre, RS (1987). He holds a degree in Remote Sensing from UFRGS and a Cartographic Engineer (2009). He holds a Master's degree (2012) and a PhD (2014) in Remote Sensing from UFRGS. He is currently a professor in the Technical Course in Surveying at IFSC and an external permanent member of the Postgraduate Program in Geodetic Sciences at UFPR. He develops research in the areas of planning, adjustment and quality control of geodetic networks. He has several free video classes at www.youtube.com/ivandroklein1 and www.youtube.com/AgrimensuraIFSC (Geodesy and Adjustment playlist: https://surl.li/bulpjs).

How to Cite

KLEIN, Ivandro; ROFATTO, Vinicius Francisco; MATSUOKA, Marcelo Tomio. The datum choice problem in Geodesy. Brazilian Journal of Cartography, [S. l.], v. 77, n. 0a, 2025. DOI: 10.14393/rbcv77n0a-75038. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistabrasileiracartografia/article/view/75038. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2026.

References

Almeida, K. B. O. Estratégias de ajustamento aplicadas ao monitoramento de deslocamentos. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, 2018. 76 p.

Altamimi, Z.; Rebischung, P.; Collilieux, X.; Métivier, L.; Chanard, K. ITRF2020: an augmented reference frame refining the modeling of nonlinear station motions. Journal of Geodesy, v. 97, n. 5, 2023.

Aydin, C. Effects of displaced reference points on deformation analysis. Journal of Surveying Engineering, v. 143, n. 3, 2017.

Baarda, W. S-transformations and criterion matrices. Publications on Geodesy, v. 5, n. 1, Delft, 1973.

Bjerhammar, A. Rectangular reciprocal matrices with special references to geodetic calculations. Bulletin Géodésique, v. 20, p. 188-220, 1951.

Blaha, G. Inner adjustment constraints with emphasis on range observations. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science No. 148, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1971.

Caspary, W. F. Concepts of network and deformation analysis. 3 ed. Monograph 11, School of Geomatic Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2000.

Chatzinikos, M.; Dermanis, A. A coordinate-invariant model for deforming geodetic networks: understanding rank deficiencies, non-estimability of parameters, and the effect of the choice of minimal constraints. Journal of Geodesy, v. 91, p. 375–396, 2017.

Dermanis, A. The photogrammetric inner constraints. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, v. 49, n. 1, 25-39, 1994.

Drewes, H. Reference systems, reference frames, and the geodetic datum. In: SIDERIS, M. (Ed.). Observing our changing Earth. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009. p. 3-9.

Duchnowski, R.; Wiśniewski, Z. Estimation of the shift between parameters of functional models of geodetic observations by applying Msplit estimation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, v. 138, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2012.

Even-Tzur, G. Extended S-transformation as a tool for deformation analysis. Survey Review, v. 44, n. 327, p. 315–318, 2012.

Gemael, C.; Machado, A. M. L.; Wandresen, R.. Introdução ao ajustamento de observações: aplicações geodésicas. 2 ed. Curitiba: Editora UFPR, 2015.

Ghilani, C. Adjustment computations: spatial data analysis. 5 ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.

Grafarend, E. W.; Schaffrin, B. Unbiased Free Net Adjustment. Survey Review, v. 22, n. 171, p. 200–218, 1974.

IERS. International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service. IERS Conventions (2010). Technical Note N° 36, PETIT, G.; LUZUM, B. (eds.), 2010.

Klein, I. Controle de qualidade no ajustamento de observações geodésicas. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sensoriamento Remoto) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. 322 p.

Klein, I.; Matsuoka, M. T.; Souza, S. F. D.; Veronez, M. R. Ajustamento de observações: uma interpretação geométrica para o método dos mínimos quadrados. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, v. 17, n. 2, p. 272-294, 2011.

Kotsakis, C. Generalized inner constraints for geodetic network densification problems. Journal of Geodesy, v. 87, p. 661-673, 2013.

Kuang, S. Geodetic network analysis and optimal design: concepts and applications. Chelsea: Ann Arbor Press, 1996.

Leick, A.; Rapoport, L.; Tatarnikov, R. GPS satellite surveying. 4 ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

Matsuoka, M. T.; Rofatto, V. F.; Klein, I.; Veronez, M. R.; Da Silveira Jr, L. G.; Neto, J. B. S.; Alves, A. C. R. Control Points Selection Based on Maximum External Reliability for Designing Geodetic Networks. Applied Sciences, v. 10, n. 2(687), 2020.

Meissl, P. Zusammenfassung und Ausbau der inneren Fehlertheorie eines Punkthaufens. Beitrage zur Theorie der Geodatischen Netze im Raum, DGK, v. A61, p. 8-21, 1969.

Monico, J. F. G. Fundamentos matemáticos envolvidos na realização do ITRS. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, v. 12, n. 2, p. 337-351, 2006.

Monico, J. F. G. As condições NNT e NNR na realização de um referencial. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, v. 11, n. 1, p. 45-52, 2005.

Monico, J. F. G. Ajustamento e Análise Estatística de Observações Aplicados na detecção de deformações. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Geodésicas) – Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 1988.

Nowel, K. Specification of deformation congruence models using combinatorial iterative DIA testing procedure. Journal of Geodesy, v. 94, n. 12, 2020.

Ogundare, J. C. Understanding least squares estimation and geomatics data analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

Papo, H. B. Extended free net adjustment constraints. Bulletin Géodésique, v. 59, p. 378-390, 1985.

Pelzer, H. Zur Analyse geodätischer Deformationsmessungen. DGK, Reihe C, Nr. 164, München, 1971.

Rodríguez, F. A. C.; De Medeiros, L. I. B.; Klein, I.; Veiga, L. A. K. Free network adjustment: Minimum inner constraints and Pseudo-inverse approaches. UD y la Geomática, v. 15, 2020.

Schaffrin, B.; Navratil, G. On Reproducing Linear Estimators within the Gauss–Markov Model with Stochastic Constraints. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, v. 41, n. 13-14, p. 2570-2587, 2012.

Sillard, P.; Boucher, C. A review of algebraic constraints in terrestrial reference frame datum definition. Journal of Geodesy, v. 75, p. 63–73, 2001.

Suraci, S. S.; Oliveira, L. C. D.; Klein, I. Two aspects on L1-norm adjustment of leveling networks. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia, v. 71, n. 2, p. 486-500, 2019.

Teunissen, P. J. G. Zero Order Design: Generalized Inverses, Adjustment, the Datum Problem and S-Transformations. In: GRAFAREND, E. W., SANSÒ, F. (Eds). Optimization and Design of Geodetic Networks. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>