The relationship between some argumentative operators and the dissociation of notions

are there specific operators for each type of argument?

Abstract

This paper supports the hypothesis that for each type of argument (or argumentative techniques) there are one or more specific argumentative operators that can only be used in certain moments and circumstances due to certain argumentative and social conditions that the type of argument demands. The argument is a term mobilized by Perelman and Tyteca (2005) and Fiorin (2015). We have, as an example, almost logical arguments; the arguments based on the structure of reality; the arguments that support the structure of the real; the dissociation of notions; etc. In this way, the objective of this work is to present the argumentative operators that can be used specifically in the type of argument by dissociation of notions (and not another), covering the relation between the pair essence / appearance and / or relations between other philosophical pairs, in the denomination of Perelman and Tyteca (2005), as means / end, consequence / principle, relative / absolute, subjective / objective, language / thought, etc. For this, we will start the text presenting a theoretical part for the development of this work, explaining, with the help of the theorists, what are the argumentative operators and how is the type of argument by dissociation of notions. Afterwards, we will present some examples and analyzes of argumentative operators that may be specific to the argumentative technique by dissociation of notions. Finally, the final considerations.