Integration of Geospatial and Alphanumeric data in the Structuring of a Database for Urban Registration
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Effective municipal management depends on a structure of methodically organized and integrated cadastral data. Cadastral data are composed of geospatial and alphanumeric data, which must be connected to a database. A recurring problem is the lack of connection between this data contained in cadastral databases, mainly due to the lack of uniformity in organizational culture and policy regarding the management and standardization of these data in all instances. The aim of this paper is to provide an improvement approach to the connection gap between geospatial and alphanumeric data in the cadastral database. The main technical challenges encountered concern the definition of semantics between data, format and language, which are achieved through data interoperability. In this context, we present solutions to structure a cadastral database. Structural, semantic and syntactic interoperability were applied using cadastral data from the municipality of Caruaru-PE. As a result of this research, a cadastral database structure is presented that enables the communication and sharing of the municipality's cadastral information.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see "The Effect of Open Access").
References
Amorim, A., Pelegrina, A. M., & Julião, R. P. (2018). Cadastro e gestão territorial: Uma visão luso-brasileira para a implementação de sistemas de informação cadastral nos municípios. São Paulo, SP: Editora UNESP.
Bagnicki, J., & Mika, M. (2013). Analysis of the incompatibility of the data of description land (property) in the cadastral example of the selected district. University of Agriculture Kołłątaj in Kraków.
Brasil. Ministério das Cidades. (2009, dezembro 8). Portaria nº 511, de 7 de dezembro de 2009. Diretrizes para a criação, instituição e atualização do Cadastro Territorial Multifinalitário (CTM) nos municípios brasileiros. Diário Oficial da União.
Brasil. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional. (2022, novembro 11). Portaria nº 3242, de 9 de novembro de 2022. Diretrizes para a criação, instituição e atualização do Cadastro Territorial Multifinalitário nos municípios brasileiros. Diário Oficial da União.
Borges, K. A. V. (2002). Curso de especialização em geoprocessamento. Belo Horizonte, MG: UFMG. Disponível em http://www.csr.ufmg.br/geoprocessamento/publicacoes/ALEXANDRE20DE20CARVALHO.PDF
Bossle, R. C. (2016). QGIS do ABC ao XYZ. In Coordenadas e escalas (Cap. 2). Paraná: Íthala.
Carneiro, A. F. T. (2003). Cadastro imobiliário e registro de imóveis: A Lei 10.267/2001, Decreto 4.449/2002 e atos normativos do INCRA. Porto Alegre, RS: Instituto de Registro Imobiliário do Brasil.
Fan, Y. T. (2010). A event-based change detection method of cadastral database incremental updating. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(9–10), 1343-1350.
Farinelli, F., & Almeida, M. B. (2014). Interoperabilidade semântica em sistemas de informação de saúde por meio de ontologias formais e informais: Um estudo da norma openehr. Conferência Internacional Acesso Aberto, Preservação Digital, Interoperabilidade, Visibilidade e Dados Científicos. Disponível em https://mba.eci.ufmg.br/downloads/Biredial2014_144_web.pdf
Farinelli, F. (2013). O papel das ontologias na interoperabilidade de sistemas de informação: Reflexões na esfera governamental. XVI ENANCIB, Florianópolis, SC.
FIG. (1995). Statement on the Cadastre (FIG publications nº 11). Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). Disponível em https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub11/figpub11.asp
Henssen, J. (1995). Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In Seminar Modern Cadastres and Cadastral Innovations: Proceedings. Delft, The Netherlands: FIG, 5–12.
Jensen, J. R. (2009). Sensoriamento remoto do ambiente: Uma perspectiva em recursos terrestres (3ª ed., J. C. N. Epiphanio et al., Trad.). São José dos Campos, SP: Editora Parêntese.
International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). (2010). Proceedings (September 12–18, 2010). Timisoara, Romania: IEEE Computer Society.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2012). ISO 19152: 2012: Geographic information – Land Administration Domain Model (LADM). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. P. (2005). Toward e-Land Administration: Australian online land information services. In Proceedings of SSC 2005 Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis: The National Biennial Conference of the Spatial Sciences Institute. Melbourne: Spatial Sciences Institute.
Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. P. (2008). Spatially referenced legal property objects. Land Use Policy, 25, 173–183.
Kitsakis, D., & Dimopoulou, E. (2016). Possibilities of integrating public law restrictions to 3D cadastre. In Proceedings of the 5th International FIG 3D Cadastre Workshop (pp. 18–20).
Machado, K. C. B., Júnior, A. E. A., & Santos, E. M. (2011). A adoção da arquitetura e-PING: Um estudo de caso na FIOCRUZ/Bahia. III Encontro de Administração da Informação. Porto Alegre, RS.
Mika, M. (2017). Interoperability cadastral data in the system approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/68303
Mohammadi, H., Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. P. (2010). Development of an interoperable tool to facilitate spatial data integration in the context of SDI. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(4), 487–505.
Mohammadi, H. (2009). The integration of multi-source spatial datasets in the context of SDI initiatives (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne.
Mucheroni, M. L., & Silva, J. F. M. (2011). A interoperabilidade dos sistemas de informação sob o enfoque da análise sintática e semântica de dados na web. Ponto de Acesso, 5(1), 3–18. Disponível em www.pontodeacesso.ici.ufba.br
Myllymäki, T., & Kautto, T. (2017). Why interoperability of data is so challenging? In FIG Working Week 2017: Surveying the World of Tomorrow - From Digitalisation to Augmented Reality. Helsinki, Finland.
Pelegrina, M. A. (2009). Diagnóstico para gestão do imposto predial e territorial urbano (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC.
Queiroz, A. O. (2018). Cidades inteligentes: O papel do cadastro territorial multifinalitário como ferramenta de gestão e planejamento. Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades, 6(37).
Remes, S., Alonen, M., Maltusch, P., Hällström, M., & Westman, S. (2016). Say, “S” (as) = Semantics — And Mean It! Path to semantically interoperable digital research services. In CRIS 2016: International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, St. Andrews, Scotland. Disponível em http://hdl.handle.net/11366/510
Roux, P. L. (2004). Extensible models and templates for sustainable land information management. In Joint FIG Commission 7 & COST ACTION G9 Workshop on Standardisation in the Cadastral Domain. Bamberg, Germany.
Sampaio, T. V. M., & Brandalize, M. C. B. (2018). Cartografia geral, digital e temática. Curitiba, PR: Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Geodésicas.
Sass, G. G., & Amorim, A. (2013). Análise temporal a partir do cadastro territorial multifinalitário. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia, 65(2), 383–391.
Tuladhar, A. (2006). Innovative use of remote sensing images for pro-poor land management. In FIG 2005: Secure Land Tenure – New Legal Frameworks and Tools in Asia and the Pacific: Proceedings of an Expert Group Meeting (pp. 145–155). International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). ISBN: 87-90907-50-7.
Vranić, S., & Matijević, H. (2015). From the wisdom of the ages to the challenges of the modern world. In Proceedings of FIG Working Week. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2008). Land administration for sustainable development. In SDIs and Technology (Cap. 9, pp. 225–261). California: Esri Press.
Zhang, J., Yin, P., Li, G., Gu, H., Zhao, H., & Fu, J. (2016). 3D cadastral data model based on conformal geometry algebra. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5020020
Zhou, X., Chen, J., & Madden, M. (2008). Classification and identification of cadastral structure change. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII(B4), 1437.