Formal style and conversational style in educational texts

what contributes more effectively to meaningful learning?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DLv18a2024-20

Keywords:

Richard E. Mayer, Personalization principle, Formal style, Conversational style, Educational texts

Abstract

In the light of Richard E. Mayer’s research on the so-called personalization principle, this article explores two opposing perspectives regarding the textual style most conducive to meaningful learning: formal style versus conversational style. Starting from a case that took place during the editing of an authorial work, I evaluate Mayer’s arguments advocating for the use of both textual styles in educational messages and didactic works. Subsequently, I provide an overview of the experiments conducted by Mayer which corroborated the effectiveness of the personalization principle. Finally, I return to my particular case, contrasting it with the results obtained by the author and highlighting the importance of educational messages seeking to establish an effective dialogue with their readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Tomás Troster, UnB

Professor do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília (UnB) e pós-doutorando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras Clássicas do Departamento de Letras Clássicas e Vernáculas, da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo (DLCV-FFLCH-USP).

References

BAKHTIN, M. Estética da criação verbal. Tradução Maria Ermantina Galvão G. Pereira. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.

BIOY CASARES, A. Diccionario del argentino exquisito. Buenos Aires: Emecé, 2005.

CLARK, R.; MAYER, R. E. e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. 4. ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2016.

DELEUZE, G. Proust e os signos. Tradução Antônio Piquet e Roberto Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2003.

GERALDI, J. W. Linguagem e ensino. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 1996.

HORKHEIMER, M. Théorie traditionnelle et théorie critique. Tradução de Claude Maillard et Sibylle Muller. Paris: Gallimard, 2019.

LIPMAN, M.; SHARP, A. M.; OSCANYAN, F. S. A filosofia na sala de aula. Tradução Ana Luíza Fernandes Falcone. São Paulo: Nova Alexandria, 1994.

LIPMAN, M. Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

MAYER, R. E.; FENNELL, S.; FARMER, L.; CAMPBELL, J. A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style”, Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 96, n. 2, p. 389-395, 2004. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389

MAYER, R. E. Multimedia Learning. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

MORENO, R; MAYER, R. E. Engaging Students in Active Learning: The Case for Personalized Multimedia Messages, Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 92, n. 4, p. 724-733, 2000. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.724

TROSTER, T. Aprender a filosofar – 3º ano, 1º semestre. São Paulo: Sieduc: 2020.

TUCÍDIDES. História da Guerra do Peloponeso. Tradução Mário da Gama Kury. Brasília; São Paulo: Editora da UnB; Instituto de Pesquisa de Relações Internacionais; Imprensa Oficial de São Paulo, 2001.

Published

2024-05-07

How to Cite

TROSTER, T. Formal style and conversational style in educational texts: what contributes more effectively to meaningful learning?. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 18, p. e1820, 2024. DOI: 10.14393/DLv18a2024-20. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/72725. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.