Para uma modelagem das formas prosódicas dos Marcadores Discursivos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/DL52-v16n4a2022-8Palabras clave:
Marcador Discursivo, Prosódia, Fala Espontânea, ModelizaçãoResumen
Este artigo tem um objetivo duplo: (i) avançar uma proposta para a identificação da categoria de Marcador Discursivo (MD), mostrando que as marcas formais do MD são de natureza prosódica e também capazes de distinguir cerca de seis diferentes funções de natureza interacional veiculadas pelos MDs. Se descrevem tanto as características prosódicas responsáveis para a identificação de um MD quanto as formas prosódicas que veiculam cada tipo de função comunicativa dentro da categoria maior de MD; (ii) mostrar detalhes da metodologia que em maior medida será adotada para modelizar essas unidades e permitir uma extração automática a partir de novos dados. Ela é apresentada com uma reflexão estatístico computacional que a justifica.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
AIJMER, K. Understanding pragmatic markers: a variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 2013. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511
AIJMER, K.; SIMON-VANDENBERGEN, A.-M. (ed.). Pragmatic markers in contrast. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080480299
D’ALESSANDRO, C. Voice source parameters and prosodic analysis. In: SUDHOFF, S.; LENERTOVA, D.; MEYER, R.; PAPPERT, S.; AUGURZKY, P.; MLEINEK, I.; RICHTER, N.; SCHLIESSER, J. (ed.). Methods in empirical prosody research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006. p. 63–87.
D’ALESSANDRO, C.; MERTENS, P. Automatic pitch contour stylization using a model of tonal perception. Computer Speech & Language, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 257–288, 1995. DOI https://doi.org/10.1006/csla.1995.0013
D’ALESSANDRO, C.; RILLIARD, A.; LE BEUX, S. Chironomic stylization of intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 129, no. 3, p. 1594–1604, 2011. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3531802
D’ALESSANDRO, C.; FEUGÈRE, L.; LE BEUX, S.; PERROTIN, O.; RILLIARD, A. Drawing melodies: Evaluation of chironomic singing synthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 135, no. 6, p. 3601–3612, 2014. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4875718
AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
BALLY, C. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. 3rd ed. Berne: A. Francke, 1950.
BANSE, R.; SCHERER, K. R. Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 70, p. 614–636, 1996. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.614
BARBOSA, P. A. From syntax to acoustic duration: A dynamical model of speech rhythm production. Speech Communication, vol. 49, no. 9, p. 725–742, 2007. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.04.013
BARBOSA, P. A. Semi-automatic and automatic tools for generating prosodic descriptors for prosody research. Proceedings from TRASP, p. 86–90, 2013.
BAZZANELLA, C. Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 629–647, Aug. 1990. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90034-B
BOERSMA, P.; WEENINK, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.16, 2020. Available at: http://www.praat.org/.
BOLDEN, G. B. Discourse Markers. In: TRACY, K.; SANDEL, T.; ILIE, C. (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. 1st ed. Wiley, 2015. p. 1–7.
BRINTON, L. J. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. De Gruyter Mouton, 1996. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582
CAMACHO, A.; HARRIS, J. G. A sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator for speech and music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 124, no. 3, p. 1638–1652, Sep. 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2951592
CAMPBELL, W.N.; ISARD, S.D. Segment durations in a syllable frame. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 37–47, Jan. 1991. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30315-8
CAVALCANTE, F. A. The information unit of topic: a crosslinguistic, statistical study based on spontaneous speech corpora. 2020. PhD Thesis – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2020.
COLE, J. Prosody in context: a review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 1–2, p. 1–31, 7 Feb. 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.963130
CONTINI, M.; PROFILI, O. L’intonation de l’italien régional - un modèle de description par traits. 1989. Mélanges de phonétique générale et expérimentale offerts à Péla Simon. Strasbourg: Publications de l’Institut de phonétique de Strasbourg, 1989. p. 855–870.
CRESTI, E. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: presso l’Accademia della Crusca, 2000.
CRESTI, E. La stanza: Un’unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In: SILFI 2008, 2010. Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana. Basel: Firenze: Cesati, 2010. p. 713–732.
CRESTI, E.; MONEGLIA, M. (ed.). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. vol. 15 (Studies in Corpus Linguistics). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15
CRESTI, E.; MONEGLIA, M. The Discourse Connector according to the Language into Act Theory: data from IPIC Italiano. In: BIDESE, E.; CASALICCHIO, J.; MORONI, M. C. (ed.). La linguistica vista dalle Alpi Linguistic views from the Alps. Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag, 2020.
DAVIDSON, L. The Effects of Pitch, Gender, and Prosodic Context on the Identification of Creaky Voice. Phonetica, vol. 76, no. 4, p. 235–262, 1 Jul. 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000490948
DE CASTRO MOUTINHO, L.; COIMBRA, R. L.; RILLIARD, A.; ROMANO, A. Mesure de la variation prosodique diatopique en portugais européen. Estudios de fonética experimental, vol. 20, p. 33–55, 2011.
DE CHEVEIGNÉ, A.; KAWAHARA, H. YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 111, no. 4, p. 1917–1930, 2002. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1458024
DEGAND, L. 7 ‘So very fast then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French. In: BEECHING, K.; DETGES, U. (ed.). Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, BRILL, 2014. p. 151–178. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_008
DI CRISTO, A.; HIRST, DJ Modelling French Micromelody: Analysis and Synthesis. Phonetica, vol. 43, no. 1–3, p. 11–30, 1 Jan. 1986. DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000261758
DUBĚDA, T.; KELLER, E. Microprosodic aspects of vowel dynamics—an acoustic study of French, English and Czech. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 447–464, Oct. 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.02.003
EVANS, J.; CHU, M.; ASTON, J. A. D.; SU, C. Linguistic and human effects on F0 in a tonal dialect of Qiang. Phonetica, vol. 67, no. 1–2, p. 82–99, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000319380
EYBEN, F; SCHULLER, B. openSMILE:): the Munich open-source large-scale multimedia feature extractor. ACM SIGMultimedia Records, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 4–13, 28 Jan. 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2729095.2729097
EYBEN, F.; SCHERER, K. R.; SCHULLER, B. W.; SUNDBERG, J.; ANDRE, E.; BUSSO, C.; DEVILLERS, L. Y.; EPPS, J.; LAUKKA, P.; NARAYANAN, S. S.; TRUONG, K. P. The Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set (GeMAPS) for Voice Research and Affective Computing. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 190–202, 1 Apr. 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2457417
FISCHER, K. (ed.). Approaches to discourse particles. Studies in pragmatics, 1. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006a. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588
FISCHER, K. Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: introduction to the volume. In: FISCHER, K. (ed.). Approaches to discourse particles. Studies in pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006b. p. 1–20. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_002
FRANK-JOB, B. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In: FISCHER, Kerstin (ed.). Approaches to discourse particles. Studies in pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. p. 395–413.
FROSALI, F. Il lessico degli Ausili Dialogici. In: CRESTI, E. (ed.). Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano: Atti del IX Congresso SILFI. Proceedings e report. 1st ed. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2008. vol. 40, p. 417–424.
FUJISAKI, H. Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In: MACNEILAGE, P. (ed.). The production of speech. New York, NY: Springer, 1983. p. 39–55. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_3
FUJISAKI, H. A note on the physiological and physical basis for the phrase and accent components in the voice fundamental frequency contour. In: FUJIMURA, O. (ed.). Vocal fold physiology: voice production, mechanisms and functions. New York, NY: Raven, 1988. p. 347–355.
GERRATT, B. R.; KREIMAN, J. Toward a taxonomy of non-modal phonation. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 365–381, Oct. 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0149
GOBBO, O. Marcadores discursivos em uma perspectiva informacional: análise prosódica e estatística. 2019. Master Thesis – Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2019.
GOUDBEEK, M.; SCHERER, K. Beyond arousal: Valence and potency control cues in the vocal expression of emotion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, no. 3, p. 1322–1336, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466853
GRABE, E.; KOCHANSKI, G.; COLEMAN, J. Connecting intonation labels to mathematical descriptions of fundamental frequency. Language and speech, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 281–310, 2007. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500030101
GURLEKIAN, J.; MIXDORFF, H.; EVIN, D.; TORRES, H.; PFITZINGER, H. R. Alignment of F0 model parameters with final and non-final accents in Argentinean Spanish. 2010. Proceedings. Speech Prosody 2010. Chicago, USA: 2010. p. paper 131.
HADJIPANTELIS, P. Z; ASTON, J. A. D.; EVANS, J. P. Characterizing fundamental frequency in Mandarin: A functional principal component approach utilizing mixed effect models. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 131, no. 6, p. 4651–4664, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4714345
HAMMARBERG, B.; FRITZELL, B.; GAUFIN, J.; SUNDBERG, J.; WEDIN, L. Perceptual and Acoustic Correlates of Abnormal Voice Qualities. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 90, no. 1–6, p. 441–451, Jan. 1980. DOI https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488009131746
HERMES, D. J. Auditory and Visual Similarity of Pitch Contours. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 63–72, 1998a. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4101.63
HERMES, D. J. Measuring the Perceptual Similarity of Pitch Contours. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 73–82, 1998b. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4101.73
HIRST, D.; DI CRISTO, A. A survey of intonation systems. In: HIRST, D.; DI CRISTO, A. (ed.). Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998. p. 1–44.
HIRST, D; DI CRISTO, A.; ESPESSER, R. Levels of Representation and Levels of Analysis for the Description of Intonation Systems. In: HORNE, M. (ed.). Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Text, Speech and Language Technology. vol. 14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000. p. 51–87. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_4
HIRST, D.; ESPESSER, R. Automatic Modelling of Fundamental Frequency Using a Quadratic Spline Function. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix, vol. 15, p. 75–85, 1993.
HIRST, D.; RILLIARD, A.; AUBERGÉ, V. Comparison of subjective evaluation and an objective evaluation metric for prosody in text-to-speech synthesis. The Third ESCA/COCOSDA Workshop (ETRW) on Speech Synthesis. 1998.
HONDA, K. Physiological factors causing tonal characteristics of speech: from global to local prosody. 2004. International Conference on Speech Prosody 2004. Nara, Japan: 2004. p. 739–744.
KOCHANSKI, G.; SHIH, C. Prosody modeling with soft templates. Speech Communication, vol. 39, no. 3–4, p. 311–352, Feb. 2003. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00047-X
KOHLER, K. J. What is emphasis and how is it coded? 2006. Proceedings. Speech Prosody 2006. Dresden, Germany: 2006. paper 015.
KREIMAN, J.; GERRATT, B. R.; ANTOÑANZAS-BARROSO, N. Measures of the Glottal Source Spectrum. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 595–610, Jun. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/042)
LAI, C. Interpreting final rises: task and role factors. 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, Ireland, 2014. p. 520–524.
LEVITT, H.; RABINER, L. R. Analysis of fundamental frequency contours in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 49, p. 569, 1971. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912388
LIÉNARD, J.-S.; DI BENEDETTO, M.-G. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 106, no. 1, p. 411–422, Jul. 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428140
LIÉNARD, J.-S. Quantifying vocal effort from the shape of the one-third octave long-term-average spectrum of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 146, no. 4, p. EL369–EL375, Oct. 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5129677
LÖFQVIST, A.; MANDERSSON, B. Long-Time Average Spectrum of Speech and Voice Analysis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 221–229, 1987. DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000265863
MACARY, M.; TAHON, M.; ESTEVE, Y.; ROUSSEAU, A. On the Use of Self-Supervised Pre-Trained Acoustic and Linguistic Features for Continuous Speech Emotion Recognition. In: IEEE SPOKEN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP (SLT), Shenzhen, China, 2021. p. 373–380. DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/SLT48900.2021.9383456
MAIA ROCHA, B.; RASO, T. A unidade informacional de Introdutor Locutivo no português do Brasil: uma primeira descrição baseada em corpus. Domínios de Lingu@gem, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 327–343, Jul. 2011. Available at: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/12479
MARTIN, Ph. Les problèmes de l’intonation: recherches et applications. Langue française, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 4–32, 1973. DOI https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1973.5638
MARTIN, Ph. Prosodic and rhythmic structures in French. Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 925–950, 1987.
MARTIN, Ph. Multi methods pitch tracking. In: Speech Prosody, 2012. Shanghai, China, 2012, p. 47–50.
MERTENS, P. The prosogram: semi-automatic transcription of prosody based on a tonal perception model. International Conference on Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 2004, p. 549–552. DOI https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v4i2.15053
MERTENS, P. Polytonia: a system for the automatic transcription of tonal aspects in speech corpora. Journal of Speech Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 17–57, 5 Feb. 2014.
MEUNIER, S.; CHATRON, J.; ABS, B.; PONSOT, E.; SUSINI, P. Effect of Pitch on the Asymmetry in Global Loudness Between Rising- and Falling-Intensity Sounds. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 104, no. 5, p. 770–773, 1 Sep. 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919220
MITTMANN, M. M. O C-ORAL-BRASIL e o estudo da fala informal: um novo olhar sobre o tópico no português brasileiro. 248 f. PhD Thesis – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2012.
MIXDORFF, H. A novel approach to the fully automatic extraction of Fujisaki model parameters. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2000. ICASSP’00. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE, 2000. vol. 3. p. 1281–1284.
MIXDORFF, H.; PFITZINGER, H. R. Analysing fundamental frequency contours and local speech rate in map task dialogs. Speech Communication, vol. 46, no. 3–4, p. 310–325, Jul. 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.019
MONEGLIA, M.; RASO, T. Appendix: Notes on the Language into Act Theory. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (eds.). Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. vol. 61, p. 468–495. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.15mon
MOORE, B. C. J.; GLASBERG, B. R.; VARATHANATHAN, A.; SCHLITTENLACHER, J. A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition. Trends in Hearing, vol. 20, Jan. 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516682698
NERBONNE, J.; COLEN, R.; GOOSKENS, C. S.; LEINONEN, T.; KLEIWEG, P. Gabmap – A web application for dialectology. Dialectologia, vol. SI II, p. 65–89, 2011.
NORDENBERG, M.; SUNDBERG, J. Effect on LTAS of vocal loudness variation. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 183–191, Dec. 2004. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430410004689
PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1980.
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Synthesizing intonation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 70, no. 4, p. 985–995, Oct. 1981. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387033
RAMSAY, J. O.; SILVERMAN, B. W. Functional data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/b98888
RASO, T. Prosodic constraints for discourse markers. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (ed.). Studies in Corpus Linguistics. vol. 61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. p. 411–467. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.14ras
RASO, T.; CAVALCANTE, F. A.; MITTMANN, M. M. Prosodic forms of the Topic information unit in a cross–linguistic perspective. A first survey. In: DE MEO, A.; DOVETTO, F. M. (ed.). La comunicazione parlata / Spoken Communication. Rome: Aracne, 2017. p. 473–498.
RASO, T.; FERRARI, L. A. Uso dei Segnali Discorsivi in corpora di parlato spontaneo italiano e brasiliano. In: FERRONI, R.; BIRELLO, M. (ed.). La competenza discorsiva e interazionale: a lezione di lingua straniera. Canterano (Roma): Aracne, 2020. p. 61–107.
RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (ed.). C-ORAL-BRASIL: corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. I. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2012.
RASO, T.; VIEIRA, M. A. A description of Dialogic Units/Discourse Markers in spontaneous speech corpora based on phonetic parameters. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 221–249, 2016.
RENCHER, A. C.; CHRISTENSEN, W. F. Methods of multivariate analysis. Third Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118391686
RILLIARD, A. Geoprosody – Quantitative approaches of prosodic variation across dialects. In: VIEIRA, M. S. M.; WIEDEMER, M. L. (ed.). Dimensões e Experiências em Sociolinguística. São Paulo: Editora Blucher, 2019. p. 55–83. DOI https://doi.org/10.5151/9788521218746-02
ROCHA, B.; MELLO, H.; RASO, T. Para a compilação do C-ORAL-ANGOLA. Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa, vol. 20, no. Especial, p. 139–157, 30 Dec. 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v20iEspecialp139-157
ROMERO-TRILLO, J. Discourse Markers. In: MEY, J. (ed.). Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier, 1998. p. 191–194.
ROSSI, M. Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour les sons de la parole. Phonetica, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 1–33, 1971. DOI https://doi.org/10.1159/000259328
SCHIFFRIN, D. Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, 1987. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841
SCHOURUP, L. Discourse markers. Lingua, vol. 107, no. 3–4, p. 227–265, Apr. 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1
SIGNOL, F.; BARRAS, C.; LIENARD, J.-S. Evaluation of the Pitch Estimation Algorithms in the monopitch and multipitch cases. In: Proceedings of Acoustics’08. Paris, France: May 2008. p. 675–680.
SIGNORINI, S. Topic e soggetto in corpora di italiano parlato spontaneo. 2005. PhD Thesis. Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italy, 2005.
SUNDBERG, J.; NORDENBERG, M. Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, no. 1, p. 453–457, Jul. 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2208451
ŠVEC, J. G.; GRANQVIST, S. Tutorial and Guidelines on Measurement of Sound Pressure Level in Voice and Speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 441–461, 15 Mar. 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0095
’T HART, J.; COLLIER, R.; COHEN, A. A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743
TALKIN, D. A robust algorithm for pitch tracking (RAPT). In: KLEIJN, W. Bastiaan; PALIWAL, K. K. (ed.). Speech coding and synthesis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995. p. 495–518.
TITZE, I. R.; SUNDBERG, J. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 91, no. 5, p. 2936–2946, May 1992. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402929
TRAUGOTT, E. C. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 7–28, 4 May 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau
TRAUNMÜLLER, H.; ERIKSSON, A. Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 107, no. 6, p. 3438–3451, Jun. 2000. DOI https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429414
TUCCI, I. L’inciso: caratteristiche morfosintattiche e intonative in un corpus di riferimento. In: ALBANO LEONI, F.; SENZA PELUSO, M. (ed.). Il parlato italiano: atti del convegno nazionale (Napoli, 13-15 febbraio 2003). Napoli: M. D’Auria editore, 2004. p. 1–14.
TUCCI, I. «Obiter dictum» La funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In: PETTORINO, M.; GIANNINI, A.; DOVETTO, F. M. (eds.). La comunicazione parlata 3. (Napoli, 23-25 febbraio 2009). Napoli: Liguori, 2010. p. 635–654.
VENABLES, W N; RIPLEY, B D. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer, 2002. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
VINCENT, D.; ROSEC, O.; CHONAVEL, T. Glottal Closure Instant Estimation using an Appropriateness Measure of the Source and Continuity Constraints. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speed and Signal Processing Proceedings. vol. 1. Toulouse, France: IEEE, 2006. p. I-381-I–384.
XU, Y. Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, vol. 46, no. 3–4, p. 220–251, Jul. 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.014
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Tommaso Raso, Albert Rilliard, Saulo Mendes Santos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Domínios de Lingu@gem utiliza la licencia Creative Commons (CC) CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, preservando así la integridad de los artículos en un ambiente de acceso abierto. La revista permite al autor conservar los derechos de publicación sin restricciones.
