The comprehension of control and raising structures in Brazilian Portuguese child language

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DLv20a2026-3

Keywords:

Control, Raising, Language Acquisition, Afro-Brazilian Portuguese, Experimental study

Abstract

Studies about acquisition of control and raising structures have observed the age the comprehension of them emerges as well as how the process happens. Some researches were done in English (Becker, 2006; Hirsch; Orfitelli; Wexler, 2008) and Spanish (Mateu; Hyams, 2017) and they show different results about children’s ability to comprehend these structures in pre-scholar age (before 6-years-old). In the present article, we present a discussion based on the results of an off-line experimental study with children acquiring Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Eighty-two children, aged between 3;2 and 5;11 participated in our study, and we aimed to observe if they could comprehend sentences with control and raising. In order to test the comprehension of the participants, we test known as Picture Selection Task (PST) (Schmitt; Miller, 2010). The description of control and raising structures and the study findings were done considering the Movement Theory of Control (MTC) (Hornstein, 1999, 2001, 2003; Boeckx; Hornstein, 2006, 2007; Nunes, 2010). The MTC claims that control and raising are derived employing A-movement, proposing an approximation of the structures in terms of derivation. Our findings suggest that the comprehension of control is prior to the comprehension of raising. This result is consistent with those obtained in studies conducted in other languages (English and Spanish). Furthermore, we also observed that when we take into account the Movement Theory of Control, A-movement does not appear to represent a difficulty for children from 3 years-old onwards, but it seems that other syntactic mechanisms may be involved in the causes of their struggling in understanding sentences with raising, such as type of complement and/or an intervenient argument. The main objectives of the present research are to contribute for the studies about the development of control and raising, and to analyze the linguistic behavior of children acquiring them in Brazilian Portuguese.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Kalyne Alves de Melo Silva, University of São Paulo

    Doutoranda em Linguística (USP), Professora da Secretaria Municipal de Educação/SP.

  • Elaine Bicudo Grolla, University of São Paulo

    Doutora em Linguística pela Universidade de Connecticut (EUA) em 2005. Professora associada do Departamento de Linguística da Universidade de São Paulo e bolsista de produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq.

References

AGOSTINHO, C. The Acquisition of control in European Portuguese complement clauses. 2014. 162 f. Dissertação. Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa. 2014.

AGOSTINHO; C. SANTOS, A. L.; DUARTE; I. The acquisition of control in European Portuguese. In: SANTOS; A. L.; GONÇAVES, A. (ed.). Complement clauses in Portuguese: syntax and acquisition. John Benjamin Publishing Company, 2018. p. 263- 293. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.09ago

AUSÍN, A.; DEPIANTE, M. On the syntax of Parecer (to seem) with and without an experiencer. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD HISPANIC LINGUISTIC SYMPOSIUM, 2000. p. 155-170.

BECKER, M. Remarks and replies: There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 37:3, p. 441-456, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.3.441

BOECKX, M.; HORNSTEIN, N. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35, p. 431 – 452, 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402625

BOECKX, M.; HORNSTEIN, N. The virtues of control as movement. Syntax 9, p. 118 – 130, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2006.00086.x

BOECKX, M.; HORNSTEIN, N. Control in Icelandic and theories of control. Linguistic Inquiry 37, p. 591 – 606, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.591

BOECKX, M.; HORNSTEIN, N. On (Non-) obligatory control. In: DAVIES, W. D.; DUBINSKY, S. (ed.). New horizons in the analysis of control and raising. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. p. 251 – 262. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6176-9_11

BOECKX, C.; HORNSTEIN, N.; NUNES, J. 2010. Control as movement. Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761997

BORER, H.; WEXLER, K. The maturation of syntax. In: ROEPER, T.; WILLIAMS, E. (ed.). Parameter setting. Netherlands: Springer, 1987. p. 123 – 172. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_6

BURZIO, R. Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. Tese de doutoramento, MIT, Cambridge, 1981.

CAIRNS, H.; MCDANIEL, D.; HSU, J. R.; M. RAPP. A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language 70, p. 260 – 288, 1994. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/415829

CHOE, J. Children seem to know raising: Raising and intervention in child language. Honolulu, HI. University of Hawaii at Manoa dissertation. 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2013.828062

CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1981.

CHOMSKY, N. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger, 1986.

CHOMSKY, N. A minimalist program for linguistics theory. In: K. HALE; S. J. KEYSER (ed.). The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Broomberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.

CHOMSKY, N. Derivation by phase. In: KENSTOWICZ, M. (ed.). Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. p. 1 – 52. DOI https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004

COLLINS, C. A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry 36, p. 289 – 298, 2005. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710701

GROLLA, E. B. Metodologias experimentais em aquisição de linguagem. Estudos da Lingua(gem) 7, p. 9 – 42, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v7i2.1090

HIRSCH, C.; ORFITELLI, R.; WEXLER, K. The acquisition of raising reconsidered. In: PROCEEDINGS OF GALA (GENERATIVE APPROACHES TO LANGUAGE ACQUISITION 2007), 2008. p. 1 – 10.

HORNSTEIN, N. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 30, n. 1, p. 69 – 96, 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968

HORNSTEIN, N. Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 30, p. 69 – 96, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999553968

HORNSTEIN, N. On control. In: Minimalist syntax. RANDALL HENDRICK (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. p. 6 – 81. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758342.ch1

HYAMS, N.; SNYDER, W. Young children never smuggle: Reflexive clitics and the Universal Freezing Hypothesis. Paper presented at the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 30]. Boston, MA, 2005.

LANDAU, I. Control in generative grammar: a research companion. Cambridge University Press, 2013. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061858

LANDAU, I. Elements of control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 2001.

MATEU, V. E.; HYAMS, N. On the learnability of implicity arguments. In: PROCEEDINGS OF GENERATIVE APPROACHES TO LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: NORTH AMERICA [GALANA 7]. Cascadilha Press, Somerville, MA, 2017.

MCDANIEL, D.; CAIRNS, H. S. The processing and acquisiton of control structures by young children. In: LYN, F.; VILLIERS, J. (ed.). Language processing and language acquisition. Kluver Academic Publishers, 1990. p. 313 – 325. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3808-6_12

MCDANIEL, d.; CAIRNS, H. S. HSU, J. Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition 1, p. 297 – 335, 1991. DOI https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0104_1

NUNES, J. Relativizing minimality for A-movement: Ø- and θ- relations. Probus 22, p. 1 – 25, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.001

NUNES, J. Hiperalçamento em português brasileiro. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, n. 12 (2), p. 199 – 227, 2020.

ORFITELLI, R. Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement. 2012. 151f. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 2012.

PERLMUTTER, D. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In: JAEGER, J. et al. (ed.). PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTIC SOCIETY. University of California at Berkeley. 1978. p. 159 – 189. DOI https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198

POSTAL, P. M. On raising: one rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1974.

ROSEBAUM, P. The grammar of English predicate complement construction. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1967.

SCHMITT, C.; MILLER, K. Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research. In: BLOM, E.; UNSWORTH, S. (ed.). Experimental methods in language acquisition research. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. p. 35 – 56. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.27.04sch

Published

2026-02-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SILVA, Kalyne Alves de Melo; GROLLA, Elaine Bicudo. The comprehension of control and raising structures in Brazilian Portuguese child language. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 20, p. e020003, 2026. DOI: 10.14393/DLv20a2026-3. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/78753. Acesso em: 2 feb. 2026.