O papel das mudanças na segmentação de eventos narrados
um olhar para as línguas de sinais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/DL49-v16n1a2022-10Palabras clave:
Segmentação de eventos narrados, Percepção de eventos narrados, Prosódia, Línguas de SinaisResumen
A capacidade de segmentar atividades contínuas em partes é um componente importante para compreender as narrativas. Estudos mostram que durante a percepção de uma atividade, seja realizada ou narrada, as mudanças nas características apresentadas na fonte de percepção atuam como chaves para a segmentação de fatos significativos. Neste estudo de revisão, observamos como as mudanças de situação (tempo, espaço, caráter, objeto, objetivo e causalidade) e físicos (marcas linguísticas) atuam no processo de segmentação de narrativas, com o objetivo de mostrar como as línguas de sinais compartilham características linguísticas e não linguísticas que atuam como pistas de demarcação de fronteiras no mecanismo de segmentação de eventos.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
ALDAY, P. M. M/EEG analysis of naturalistic stories: a review from speech to language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(4), p. 457-473, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1546882
BARKER, R. G.; WRIGHT. H. F. Midwest and its children: the psychological ecology of an American town. Evanston: Row, Peterson, 1954. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/10027-000
BICKMORE, T.; CASSELL, J. Social Dialogue with Embodied Conversational Agents, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2
EVANS, V. On the nature of lexical concepts. Bangor University: UK, 2010.
EVANS, V. Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 17, p. 491–534, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016
EVANS, V. Semantic representation in LCCM Theory. In: EVANS, V.; POURCEL, S. (ed.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.06eva
EVANS, V. Semantic structure vs. conceptual structure: the nature of lexical concepts in a simulation-based account of language understanding. School of Linguistics and English Language: Bangor, 2009.
FENLON, J.; DENMARK, T.; CAMPBELL, R.; WOLL, B. Seeing sentence boundaries. Sign Language & Linguistics. 10, p. 177-200, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.06fen
FÉRY, C. Intonation and prosodic structure. Key topics in phonology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139022064
FLECHA-GARCÍA, M. Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication. 52, p. 542-554, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.003
FORGAS, J. P. The Perception of Social Episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus. In: FURNHAM, A.; ARGYLE, M. (ed.). The Psychology of Social Situations: Selected Readings. Pergamon Press: Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Frankfurt, Paris, 1981. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-023719-0.50015-2
GERNSBACHER, M. A. Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1990. DOI https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA221854
GIORA, R. Language comprehension as structure building. Journal of Pragmatics, p. 417–436, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00071-2
GROSZ, B.; HIRSCHBERG, J. Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. Proc. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Canada, October 1992. p. 492–432.
GROSZ, B. J.; CANDACE L. S. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, Volume 12, Number 3, p.175-204, July-September 1986.
HERNAULT H.; BOLLEGALA D.; ISHIZUKA M. A Sequential Model for Discourse Segmentation. In: GELBUKH A. (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_26
HIRSCHBERG, J.; BARBARA J. G. Intonational features of local and global discourse structure. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, February 23-26, 1992, Harriman, New York, ed. ACM International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992. p. 441-446.
KIM, J. Individual Differences in the Production and Perception of Prosodic Boundaries in American English. 2020. 155 f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy, Linguistics) - The University of Michigan, Michigan, 2020.
KURBY C. A.; ZACKS J. M. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends Cogn Sci, 12 (2), p. 72-79, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004
LABOV, W. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: LABOV, W. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1972.
MALAIA, E. et al. Event Segmentation in a Visual Language: Neural Bases of Processing American Sign Language Predicates. Neuroimage. PMC, p. 4094–4101, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.034
MANN, W. C.; THOMPSON, S. A. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8, p. 243–281, 1988. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
MCCLOUD, S. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Northampton: Kitchen Sink Press, 1993.
MUSILIYU, O. O papel da prosódia no processamento da estrutura do discurso em língua portuguesa: Estudos com técnicas experimentais on-line. 2019, no prelo.
MUSILIYU, O.; GILBERT, A. C.; BAUM, S. R.; OLIVEIRA M. Electrophysiological correlates of prosodic boundaries at different levels in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, 2019, no prelo.
NESPOR, M.; IRENE, V. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris, 1986.
OLIVEIRA, M. Jr.; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S.; FERREIRA, F.; SWAAB, T. O Papel da Prosódia no Processamento da Estrutura do Discurso em Língua Portuguesa: um Estudo de Potenciais Relacionados a Eventos. 2019, no prelo.
OLIVEIRA, M. Jr.; CRUZ, R.; SILVA, E. W. A relação entre a prosódia e a estrutura de narrativas espontâneas: um estudo perceptual. Revista Diadorim, v. 12, n. 0, p. 38–53, 2013. DOI https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2012.v12n0a3971
PASSONNEAU, R.; LITMAN, D. Discourse Segmentation by Human and Automated Means. Computational Liunguistics. 23, p. 103-109, 1997.
PEREIRA, J. Estudo perceptual da prosódia como elemento delimitador da estrutura de narrativas orais espontâneas: a diferença de tom. 2014, 150 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras). Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, 2014.
POLANYI, L. A formal model of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, p. 601-638, 1988. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90050-1
PRUDEN, S. M.; HIRSH-PASEK, K.; GOLINKOFF, R. M. Current events: how infants parse the world and events for language. In: SHIPLEY, T. F.; ZACKS, J. M. (ed.). Understand events: from perception to action. Oxford series in visual cognition. Oxford University Press: New York, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0008
QUER, J.; CECCHETTO, C.; DONATI, C. (ed.). SignGram Blueprint. A Guide to Sign Language Grammar Writing. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/467598. Acessado em: 17 mar. 2019.
RADVANSKY, G. A.; ZACKS, J. M. Event Cognition. Oxford University Press: New York, 2014. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898138.001.0001
SLOETJES, H.; WITTENBURG, P. Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).
STEINHAUER, K.; ALTER, K.; FRIEDERICI, A. D. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Euroscience. 2(2), p. 191–196, 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/5757
VAN DIJK, T. A.; KINTSCH, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983.
ZACKS, J. M. Ten Lectures on the Representation of Events in Language, Perception, Memory, and Action Control. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004395169
ZACKS, J. M.; KHENA M. S. Event segmentation. Current directions in psychological science. PMC, 2007. p. 80–84. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x
ZACKS, J. M.; KURBY, C. A. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends Cogn Sci. February, 12 (2), p.72–79, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004
ZACKS, J. M.; MAR, R. A.; CALARCO, N. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Discourse: Covered Ground and New Directions. In: SCHOBER, M. F.; RAPP, D. N.; BRITT, M. A. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes. Second Edition. Routledge: New York, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687384-15
ZACKS, J. M.; TVERSKY, B.; IYER, G. Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 130, n. 1, p. 29–58, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29
ZWAAN, R. A.; RAPP, D. N. Discourse Comprehension. In: Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Elsevier Ltd., 2006. p. 725-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50019-5
ZWAAN, R. A.; MAGLIANO, J. P.; GRAESSER, A. C. Dimensions of Situation Model Construction in Narrative Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, v. 21, n. 2, p. 386–397, 1995. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
ZWAAN, R. A.; RADVANSKY, G. A. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1998. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Humberto Meira de Araujo Neto, Miguel Oliveira Jr.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Domínios de Lingu@gem utiliza la licencia Creative Commons (CC) CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, preservando así la integridad de los artículos en un ambiente de acceso abierto. La revista permite al autor conservar los derechos de publicación sin restricciones.
