Moral Frames and Ethics in Star Trek
a Cognitive-Discursive reading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/DLv19a2025-47Keywords:
Frames, Moral frame, Star Trek, Morality, DiscourseAbstract
This paper investigates, under the theory of Moral Frames (Lakoff, 2004; 2008), the ethical-discursive foundations that structure the fictional universe of the Star Trek franchise. Understanding language as a cognitive-ideological system, the research adopts as its main reference the Frame Semantics (Fillmore, 1976; 1982), especially regarding the notion that words and constructions mobilize networks of culturally situated knowledge. The objective is to describe and interpret how certain narrative situations reveal the activation of parental models, the Strict Father and the Nurturing Parent, which structure moral decisions within the Starfleet diegesis, revealing the presence of moral disputes that go beyond the limits of fictional discourse. The analytical corpus consists of three selected episodes of the series: one that exemplifies the nurturing father, one centered on the strict father, and another that stages a reframing process (Lakoff, 2004) between both models. The analysis is inserted in a qualitative paradigm of interpretative orientation (Silverman, 2000) and adopts the methodological procedure of the evidentiary paradigm (Ginzburg, 1989), searching for linguistic, narrative, and ideological traces that point to deep moral structures, operating at the level of embodied cognition (Barsalou, 2008). As an auxiliary tool, a summary table was created with the main ethical principles reiterated throughout the narrative of the Fleet, serving as a comparative guide in the case studies. The results suggest that moral frames, as structural interpretative schemas, function as keys to understanding the characters' choices, the discursive organization, and the staging of values in tension. The federative utopia of Star Trek, although anchored in Enlightenment values, presents discursive fissures where hierarchical pragmatism and empathetic idealism compete for space, revealing that morality in the diegetic universe is, above all, a linguistic, political and cultural construction. By demonstrating the productivity of the moral frames model for the analysis of fictional works, this study contributes with a theoretical-methodological instrument for the field of critical cognitive linguistics.
Downloads
References
BARSALOU, L. W. Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology. California, v. 59, n. 01 p. 617-645, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
BARTLETT, F. C. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x
DUQUE, P. H. Discurso e cognição: uma abordagem baseada em frames. Revista da ANPOLL. Florianópolis, v.1, n.39, p. 25-48. 2015. DOI https://doi.org/10.18309/anp.v1i39.902
FILLMORE, C. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In: HARNAD, S. R.; STEKLIS, H. D.; LANCASTER, J. (ed.). Origins and evolution of language and speech. Nova York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976.
FILLMORE, C. Frame Semantics. In: Linguistics in the morning calm: the linguistic society of Korea (ed.). Seoul : Hanshin, 1982. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373
GEERTZ, C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Nova York: Basic Books, 1973.
GINZBURG, C. Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário. In: GINZBURG, C. Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989. p. 143–179.
GOFFMAN, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Nova York: Harper & Row, 1974.
HAIDT, J. The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. Nova York: Pantheon Books, 2012.
JOHNSON, M. Moral imagination: implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
KANT, I. Resposta à Pergunta: Que é o Esclarecimento? E outros textos. Tradução de Estevão C. de Rezende Martins. São Paulo: Penguin-Companhia das Letras, 2022.
LAKOFF, G. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.
LAKOFF, G. The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. Nova York: Viking, 2008.
LAKOFF, G. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3. ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016. DOI https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226411323.001.0001
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Nova York: Basic Books, 1999.
LEANDRO, E. G.; PASSOS, C. L. B. O Paradigma Indiciário Para Análise de Narrativas. Educar Em Revista. Curitiba, v. 37, p.1-28, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.74611
MANDLER, J. M. Foundations of Mind: The Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
MENARY, R. Pragmatism and the Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science. In: ENGEL, A. K., FRISTON, K. J.; KRAGIC, D. (ed). The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Strüngmann Forum Reports, vol. 18. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. p. 219-236.
MINSKY, M. A. framework for representing knowledge. In: WINSTON, P. H. (ed.). The Psychology of Computer Vision. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
O’NEILL, E. Electra Enlutada. Tradução de R. Magalhães Júnior e Miroel Silveira. Rio de Janeiro: Bloch,1970.
RUMELHART, D. E. Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In: ANDERSON, R. J.; SPIRO, R. J.; MONTAGUE, W. E. (org.). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977. p. 33-58.
SCHANK, R. C.; ABELSON, R. P. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
SILVERMAN, D. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Londres: Sage Publications, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eduardo Alves Da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain the copyright and waiver the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), allowing the sharing of work with authorship recognition and preventing its commercial use.
Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.


