Automation of the Van de Casteele Test via Deep Learning: Feasibility and Analysis of Instantaneous Sampling

Main Article Content

Salomão Soares
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4826-776X
Regiane Dalazoana
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-0679
Mariana Eiko Borba Inoue
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-3769
Everton Gomes Dos Santos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-7755
Luiz Fernando Reinheimer
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6858-6604

Abstract

The Van de Casteele Test is an important step in analyzing the quality of observations from tide gauge stations, but its manual execution is laborious. To automate this process, this research evaluated the use of a deep learning model based on YOLO, applied to images of the tide staff at the Arraial do Cabo tide gauge station, captured by low-cost digital cameras. The study also analyzed the limits of instantaneous inference, characterized by direct image measurement without the common time-averaging filters found in electronic sensors. In tide staff detection, the model showed excellent performance across various scenarios, with mAP50 of 0.995 and mAP50-95 ranging from 0.844 to 0.913. The metrological validation compared five experiments, using the conventional method as a reference. Regarding accuracy, while the Radar and Encoder sensors showed standard deviations (SD) of 0.02 m when compared to tide staff readings taken by an observer, the computer vision model converged to a SD of 0.03 m throughout the experiments. This slightly higher variability, together with an identified systematic bias, is attributed to the instantaneous capture of the sea surface, which records high-frequency noise (waves) that is filtered out by the temporal integration of level sensors and by the observer. Therefore, the results demonstrate that, given the instantaneous nature of image capture, the technique is robust and feasible for automating the Van de Casteele Test.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Special Section "I CIRF & VIII SIMGEO 2025"

Author Biography

Salomão Soares, Federal University of Paraná

Salomão Soares was born in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1980. He received the B.Sc. degree in Cartographic Engineering from the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) in 2003 and the M.Sc. degree in Population Studies and Social Research from the Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas (ENCE) in 2006. He is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in Geodetic Sciences at the Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR). He works as a Technologist at the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), within the Geodesy Coordination. His research interests include vertical reference systems, satellite altimetry, and tide gauge observations. 

How to Cite

SOARES, Salomão; DALAZOANA, Regiane; INOUE, Mariana Eiko Borba; DOS SANTOS, Everton Gomes; REINHEIMER, Luiz Fernando. Automation of the Van de Casteele Test via Deep Learning: Feasibility and Analysis of Instantaneous Sampling . Revista Brasileira de Cartografia, Uberlândia, v. 78, 2026. DOI: 10.14393/rbcv78n-84090. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistabrasileiracartografia/article/view/84090. Acesso em: 10 sep. 2026.

References

Birol, F., Bignalet-Cazalet, F., Cancet, M., Daguze, J.-A., Fkaier, W., Fouchet, E., Léger, F., Maraldi, C., Niño, F., Pujol, M.-I., & Tran, N. (2025). Understanding uncertainties in the satellite altimeter measurement of coastal sea level: insights from a round-robin analysis. Ocean Science, 21, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-133-2025.

Centro de Hidrografia da Marinha – CHM. (2025). Tábuas de Maré 2025. https://www.marinha.mil.br/chm/tabuas-de-mare?page=0.

Dalazoana, R., Luz, R.T., Lima, S.R.S., Miranda, Fr. A., Palmeiro, A.S., Miranda, Fa. A. e Freitas, S. R. C. (2005). Controle vertical das RRNN e da posição geocêntrica do maregáfico no Porto de Imbituba. [Conference paper]. IV Colóquio Brasileiro de Ciências Geodésicas, Curitiba. https://artigos.ibge.gov.br/artigos-home/geodesia/2008-2005.

Del Rosso, M. P., Sebastianelli, A. P., Aparício, S. P., & Wheeler, J. P. (2021). How to create a proper EO dataset. In: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Satellite-based Remote Sensing Data for Earth Observation. IET. (pp. 113–130). https://doi.org/10.1049/PBTE098E_ch6.

Freitas, G. T. M. (2022). Software para identificação de defeitos na superfície de pavimentos rodoviários utilizando Deep Learning. 109 f. [Master's thesis, Universidade Federal do Ceará – UFC]. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/69600

Gemael, C. (2019). Introdução à geodésia física. Editora UFPR.

Google. (2026). Google Colab [Software]. https://colab.research.google.com/

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2010). Instruções técnicas para controle geodésico de estações maregáficas – CGEM e sua vinculação vertical ao Sistema Geodésico Brasileiro – SGB. IBGE. https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/metodos_e_outros_documentos_de_referencia/revista_e_manuais_tecnicos/mtg11.pdf

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2021). Monitoramento da variação do nível médio do mar nas estações da Rede Maregáfica Permanente para Geodesia: 2001–2020. IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101890.pdf

Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission – IOC. (2024). State of the Ocean Report. IOC-UNESCO. (IOC Technical Series, 190). https://doi.org/10.25607/4wbg.

Jähne, B. (2005). Digital Image Processing. [S.l.]: Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27563-0

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lima, J. M. C. (2019). Reconhecimento e análise de rachaduras a partir de imagens para monitoramento em regiões com atividade sísmica frequente. [Master's thesis, Universidade Federal de Alagoas - UFAL]. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Informática. Maceió, Alagoas. http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/7280

Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Lubomir Bourdev, Girshick, R., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., C. Lawrence Zitnick, & Piotr Dollár. (2014). Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. ArXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1405.0312

Miguez, B. M., Testut, L., & Wöppelmann, G. (2008). The Van de Casteele test revisited: an efficient approach to tide gauge error characterization. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 25(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHO554.1

Mucci, T. (2024). Overfitting vs. underfitting. Ibm.com. https://www.ibm.com/br-pt/think/topics/overfitting-vs-underfitting

Sánchez, L., & Sideris, M. G. (2017). Vertical datum unification for the International Height Reference System (IHRS). Geophysical Journal International, 209(2), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx025.

Silveira, L. N. (2023). Aplicação de dados altimétricos orbitais e nivelamento hidrográfico em corpos hídricos continentais para a integração de referenciais verticais. [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul]. Lume Repositório Digital. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/272222.

Skalski, P. (2022). Make Sense (version 1.11.0). https://www.makesense.ai/; https://github.com/SkalskiP/make-sense

Soares, S., Dalazoana, R., Inoue, M. E. B., Dos Santos, E. G., & Reinheimer, L. F. (2025). Investigação preliminar do aprendizado profundo no teste de Van de Casteele na estação maregáfica de Arraial do Cabo/RJ. [Conference paper]. I Congresso Internacional de Regularização Fundiária & VIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Ciências Geodésicas e Tecnologias da Geoinformação (I CIRF & VIII SIMGEO), Recife. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17135655.

SONEL. (2019). Quality control of the measurements published by SHOM. https://www.sonel.org/_Quality-control-of-the.html.

Srivastava, A., Dalvi, A., Britto, C., Rai, H., & Shelke, K. (2020). Explicit content detection using Faster R-CNN and SSD MobileNet v2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3). https://www.irjet.net/archives/V7/i3/IRJET-V7I31126.pdf.

Taye, M. M. (2023). Theoretical understanding of convolutional neural network: concepts, architectures, applications, future directions. Computation, 11(52). https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11030052.

Terven, J., Córdova-Esparza, D.-M., & Romero-González, J.-A. (2023). A comprehensive review of YOLO architectures in computer vision. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5, 1680–1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/make5040083.

Torge, W., & Müller, J. (2012). Geodesy (4th ed.). Walter de Gruyter.

ULTRALYTICS. (2023). YOLOv8. https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov8/.

UNESCO. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. (1985). Manual de medição e interpretação do nível do mar. IOC. https://www.jodc.go.jp/info/ioc_doc/Manual/065061eb.pdf

UNESCO. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. (2002). Manual on sea level measurement and interpretation: reappraisals and recommendations as of the year 2000. IOC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000125129?posInSet=1&queryId=f96ff20a-ffad-4228-98d2-81751401754f

UNESCO. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. (2016). Manual on sea level measurement and interpretation: radar gauges. IOC. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246981?posInSet=2&queryId=f96ff20a-ffad-4228-98d2-81751401754f

Zeng, J., Zhong, H. (2024). YOLOv8-PD: an improved road damage detection algorithm based on YOLOv8n model. Sci Rep 14, 12052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62933-z

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>