Repercussions of data collection methods on the perception of phonetic variation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DL40-v13n4a2019-10

Keywords:

Methodology, Phonetic variation, Perception

Abstract

This article investigates the effects of data collection methodology on the phonetic perception of coda [s] and [ʃ] in Brazilian Portuguese. To do so, 30 Florianopolitan speakers performed a similarity rating test. The results indicated that the place of origin of speakers’ parents does not affect the perception of the relative degree of similarity between the variable alveolar and post-alveolar fricatives. This result suggests that the data collection methodology carried out under the assumption of Sociolinguistics – which predicts that informants and their parents must have been born and raised in the same place, i. e., they must share the same linguistic variety – may be expanded in terms of contemplating informants whose parents are speakers of other dialectal varieties. It is understood that this methodological approach is relevant to the research on the perception of phonetic variation since it allows a closer approximation of the linguistic reality of the urban centers, which is marked by the great population mobility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BARANOWSKI, M. Sociophonetics. In: BAYLEY, R.; CAMERON, R.; LUCAS, C. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 403-424. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0020

BIASIBETTI, A. P. C. S. Produção e percepção das fricativas sibilantes em Porto Alegre/RS e Florianópolis/SC. 2018. 195 f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2018.

BRESCANCINI, C. R. A fricativa palato-alveolar e sua complexidade: uma regra variável. 2002. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.

BOERSMA; P.; WEENINK, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Programa de computador]. Versão 6.0.18, 2016.

ECKERT, P.; LABOV, W. Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, v. 21, n. 4, p. 467–496, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12244

FOULKES, P. Exploring social-indexical variation: a long past but a short history. Laboratory Phonology, v. 1, p. 5–39, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.003

FOULKES, P.; DOCHERTY, G. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, v. 34, n. 4, p. 409–438, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002

FOULKES, P.; SCOBBIE, J. M; WATT, D. Sociophonetics. In: HARDCASTLE, W. J; LAVER, J; GIBBON, F. E. (ed.). The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2010. p. 703–754. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317251.ch19

GOLDINGER, S. Words and voices: perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In: JOHNSON, K; MULLENNIX, J. (ed.). Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997. p. 33–66.

JOHNSON, K. Speech perception without speaker normalization. In: JOHNSON, K; MULLENNIX, J. (ed.). Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997. p. 145-165.

MENDES, R. B.; OUSHIRO, L. O paulistano no mapa sociolinguístico brasileiro. ALFA, v. 56, n. 2, p. 973-1001, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-57942012000300011

OUSHIRO, L. Identidade na pluralidade: avaliação, produção e percepção linguística na cidade de São Paulo. 394 f. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Semiótica e Linguística Geral, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.

PEIRCE, J. W. PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, v. 162, n. 1−2, 2007. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017

PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In: BYBEE, J. L.; HOPPER, P. (ed.). Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 2001. p. 137–157. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie

RSTUDIO TEAM. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, 2017. Disponível em: http://www.rstudio.com/

THOMAS, E. R. Sociophonetics: an introduction. Basingstoke, UK/New York: Palgrave, 2011. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28561-4

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

BIASIBETTI, A. P. C. da S. Repercussions of data collection methods on the perception of phonetic variation. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 13, n. 4, p. 1581–1595, 2019. DOI: 10.14393/DL40-v13n4a2019-10. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/46901. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.