O papel das mudanças na segmentação de eventos narrados

um olhar para as línguas de sinais

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DL49-v16n1a2022-10

Palavras-chave:

Segmentação de eventos narrados, Percepção de eventos narrados, Prosódia, Línguas de Sinais

Resumo

A capacidade de segmentar atividades contínuas em partes é um componente importante para compreender as narrativas. Estudos mostram que durante a percepção de uma atividade, seja realizada ou narrada, as mudanças nas características apresentadas na fonte de percepção atuam como chaves para a segmentação de fatos significativos. Neste estudo de revisão, observamos como as mudanças de situação (tempo, espaço, caráter, objeto, objetivo e causalidade) e físicos (marcas linguísticas) atuam no processo de segmentação de narrativas, com o objetivo de mostrar como as línguas de sinais compartilham características linguísticas e não linguísticas que atuam como pistas de demarcação de fronteiras no mecanismo de segmentação de eventos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Humberto Meira de Araujo Neto, UFAL

Mestre, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).

Miguel Oliveira Jr., UFAL

Doutor, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).

Referências

ALDAY, P. M. M/EEG analysis of naturalistic stories: a review from speech to language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(4), p. 457-473, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1546882

BARKER, R. G.; WRIGHT. H. F. Midwest and its children: the psychological ecology of an American town. Evanston: Row, Peterson, 1954. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/10027-000

BICKMORE, T.; CASSELL, J. Social Dialogue with Embodied Conversational Agents, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2

EVANS, V. On the nature of lexical concepts. Bangor University: UK, 2010.

EVANS, V. Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 17, p. 491–534, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016

EVANS, V. Semantic representation in LCCM Theory. In: EVANS, V.; POURCEL, S. (ed.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.06eva

EVANS, V. Semantic structure vs. conceptual structure: the nature of lexical concepts in a simulation-based account of language understanding. School of Linguistics and English Language: Bangor, 2009.

FENLON, J.; DENMARK, T.; CAMPBELL, R.; WOLL, B. Seeing sentence boundaries. Sign Language & Linguistics. 10, p. 177-200, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.06fen

FÉRY, C. Intonation and prosodic structure. Key topics in phonology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139022064

FLECHA-GARCÍA, M. Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication. 52, p. 542-554, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.12.003

FORGAS, J. P. The Perception of Social Episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus. In: FURNHAM, A.; ARGYLE, M. (ed.). The Psychology of Social Situations: Selected Readings. Pergamon Press: Oxford, New York, Toronto, Sydney, Frankfurt, Paris, 1981. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-023719-0.50015-2

GERNSBACHER, M. A. Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1990. DOI https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA221854

GIORA, R. Language comprehension as structure building. Journal of Pragmatics, p. 417–436, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00071-2

GROSZ, B.; HIRSCHBERG, J. Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. Proc. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Canada, October 1992. p. 492–432.

GROSZ, B. J.; CANDACE L. S. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, Volume 12, Number 3, p.175-204, July-September 1986.

HERNAULT H.; BOLLEGALA D.; ISHIZUKA M. A Sequential Model for Discourse Segmentation. In: GELBUKH A. (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_26

HIRSCHBERG, J.; BARBARA J. G. Intonational features of local and global discourse structure. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, February 23-26, 1992, Harriman, New York, ed. ACM International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992. p. 441-446.

KIM, J. Individual Differences in the Production and Perception of Prosodic Boundaries in American English. 2020. 155 f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy, Linguistics) - The University of Michigan, Michigan, 2020.

KURBY C. A.; ZACKS J. M. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends Cogn Sci, 12 (2), p. 72-79, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004

LABOV, W. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: LABOV, W. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1972.

MALAIA, E. et al. Event Segmentation in a Visual Language: Neural Bases of Processing American Sign Language Predicates. Neuroimage. PMC, p. 4094–4101, 2012. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.034

MANN, W. C.; THOMPSON, S. A. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8, p. 243–281, 1988. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243

MCCLOUD, S. Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. Northampton: Kitchen Sink Press, 1993.

MUSILIYU, O. O papel da prosódia no processamento da estrutura do discurso em língua portuguesa: Estudos com técnicas experimentais on-line. 2019, no prelo.

MUSILIYU, O.; GILBERT, A. C.; BAUM, S. R.; OLIVEIRA M. Electrophysiological correlates of prosodic boundaries at different levels in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, 2019, no prelo.

NESPOR, M.; IRENE, V. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris, 1986.

OLIVEIRA, M. Jr.; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S.; FERREIRA, F.; SWAAB, T. O Papel da Prosódia no Processamento da Estrutura do Discurso em Língua Portuguesa: um Estudo de Potenciais Relacionados a Eventos. 2019, no prelo.

OLIVEIRA, M. Jr.; CRUZ, R.; SILVA, E. W. A relação entre a prosódia e a estrutura de narrativas espontâneas: um estudo perceptual. Revista Diadorim, v. 12, n. 0, p. 38–53, 2013. DOI https://doi.org/10.35520/diadorim.2012.v12n0a3971

PASSONNEAU, R.; LITMAN, D. Discourse Segmentation by Human and Automated Means. Computational Liunguistics. 23, p. 103-109, 1997.

PEREIRA, J. Estudo perceptual da prosódia como elemento delimitador da estrutura de narrativas orais espontâneas: a diferença de tom. 2014, 150 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras). Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, 2014.

POLANYI, L. A formal model of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, p. 601-638, 1988. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90050-1

PRUDEN, S. M.; HIRSH-PASEK, K.; GOLINKOFF, R. M. Current events: how infants parse the world and events for language. In: SHIPLEY, T. F.; ZACKS, J. M. (ed.). Understand events: from perception to action. Oxford series in visual cognition. Oxford University Press: New York, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0008

QUER, J.; CECCHETTO, C.; DONATI, C. (ed.). SignGram Blueprint. A Guide to Sign Language Grammar Writing. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/467598. Acessado em: 17 mar. 2019.

RADVANSKY, G. A.; ZACKS, J. M. Event Cognition. Oxford University Press: New York, 2014. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898138.001.0001

SLOETJES, H.; WITTENBURG, P. Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008).

STEINHAUER, K.; ALTER, K.; FRIEDERICI, A. D. Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Euroscience. 2(2), p. 191–196, 1999. DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/5757

VAN DIJK, T. A.; KINTSCH, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983.

ZACKS, J. M. Ten Lectures on the Representation of Events in Language, Perception, Memory, and Action Control. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004395169

ZACKS, J. M.; KHENA M. S. Event segmentation. Current directions in psychological science. PMC, 2007. p. 80–84. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00480.x

ZACKS, J. M.; KURBY, C. A. Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends Cogn Sci. February, 12 (2), p.72–79, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004

ZACKS, J. M.; MAR, R. A.; CALARCO, N. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Discourse: Covered Ground and New Directions. In: SCHOBER, M. F.; RAPP, D. N.; BRITT, M. A. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes. Second Edition. Routledge: New York, 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687384-15

ZACKS, J. M.; TVERSKY, B.; IYER, G. Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 130, n. 1, p. 29–58, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29

ZWAAN, R. A.; RAPP, D. N. Discourse Comprehension. In: Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Elsevier Ltd., 2006. p. 725-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50019-5

ZWAAN, R. A.; MAGLIANO, J. P.; GRAESSER, A. C. Dimensions of Situation Model Construction in Narrative Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, v. 21, n. 2, p. 386–397, 1995. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386

ZWAAN, R. A.; RADVANSKY, G. A. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1998. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162

Downloads

Publicado

06-01-2022

Como Citar

ARAUJO NETO, H. M. de; OLIVEIRA JR., M. O papel das mudanças na segmentação de eventos narrados : um olhar para as línguas de sinais. Domínios de Lingu@gem, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 255–297, 2022. DOI: 10.14393/DL49-v16n1a2022-10. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/61700. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2022.