ITACaRT: An Equal-Area Parallelogram Discrete Global Grid System for Terrestrial Cadastral Mapping—Designed for Usability and Blockchain Integration

Main Article Content

Israel Nunes da Silva
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4168-1043
Gabriel Dietzsch
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-2416
Elcio Hideiti Shiguemori
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-0435

Abstract

Typically, the modernization of Land Administration Systems (LAS) concentrates on overarching aspects and seldom investigates the spatial infrastructure that underpins it, thereby presenting challenges for the integration of geospatial data. For this purpose, Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGS), characterized by its "congruent cartography", offer a promising solution within a multi-scale reference framework. Moreover, a significant gap exists in the absence of a DGGS designed to address the cartographic focus and usability requirements for land administration, such as equal-area sizing and geodetic precision. Developed at the Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), the ITA Cadastral Ellipsoidal Reference Tessellation (ITACaRT) was introduced as an innovative DGGS to bridge this gap. The development of ITACaRT was guided by several key criteria, including its suitability for cadastral purposes at appropriate scales, compatibility with the WGS84 ellipsoid and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), utilization of simple parallelogram-shaped equal-area cells, a direct tessellation adhering to Cartesian geometry for usability by geoinformation professionals, and decimal convergence to facilitate blockchain tokenization. Complementary to these criteria, a Compositional Hierarchical Indexing system was devised to represent cadastral vector features more efficiently than the atomic identifiers typical of conventional DGGS. ITACaRT thus establishes a solid foundation for contemporary LAS, providing a viable spatial infrastructure that supports emerging technologies such as blockchain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Special Section "Brazilian Symposium on GeoInformatics"

Author Biographies

Israel Nunes da Silva, Aeronautics Institute of Technology

Israel Nunes da Silva is a Master’s student in Space Sciences and Technologies at the Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA) in São José dos Campos, Brazil. He is an Officer in the Brazilian Air Force, where he has worked since 2015 with geoprocessing and real estate management. He holds degrees in Cartographic and Surveying Engineering from the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR, 2014) and in Systems Analysis and Development from Mackenzie Presbyterian University (2021). His primary research interests include Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGS) and small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) applications.

Gabriel Dietzsch, Institute for Advanced Studies

He is a PhD candidate in Applied Computing with an emphasis on Artificial Intelligence at the National Institute for Space Research (INPE). He holds a Master's degree in Computer Engineering (Geomatics) from the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ, 2012) and a Bachelor's degree in Cartographic Engineering from the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR, 2007). With extensive experience in Geosciences, he is currently the Head of the C4ISR Division at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IEAv) of the Department of Aerospace Science and Technology (DCTA), conducting research in Command and Control (C2). He previously served at the Aeronautical Cartography Institute (ICA) as Head of the Cartography Subdivision, Photogrammetry Section, Visual Charts Section, Aerodrome Protection Zone Section, and Field Operations Section. He is a member of the National Cartography Commission (CONCAR) and has been awarded the Santos-Dumont Merit Medal and the Knight of the Order of Cartographic Merit.

Elcio Hideiti Shiguemori, Institute for Advanced Studies

He is a Researcher at the Institute for Advanced Studies (IEAv) of the Department of Aerospace Science and Technology (DCTA). He also serves as a faculty member in the Graduate Program in Applied Computing at the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) and in the PG-CTE Graduate Program at the Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA). Additionally, he is a professor and the coordinator of the Computer Engineering course at Universidade Paulista (UNIP). He received his PhD (2007) and Master's degree (2002) in Applied Computing from INPE, and holds Bachelor's degrees in Computer Engineering (1998) and Computer Science from UBC (1999). His experience is in the field of Computing, with a primary focus on Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Data Science, Autonomous Air Navigation, Image Processing, and Computer Vision.

How to Cite

NUNES DA SILVA, Israel; DIETZSCH, Gabriel; HIDEITI SHIGUEMORI, Elcio. ITACaRT: An Equal-Area Parallelogram Discrete Global Grid System for Terrestrial Cadastral Mapping—Designed for Usability and Blockchain Integration. Brazilian Journal of Cartography, [S. l.], v. 77, n. 0a, 2025. DOI: 10.14393/rbcv77n0a-79281. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistabrasileiracartografia/article/view/79281. Acesso em: 4 feb. 2026.

References

Benahmed Daho, A. (2020). CRYPTO-SPATIAL: An open standards smart contracts library for building geospatially enabled decentralized applications on the Ethereum blockchain. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B4-2020, 421–426. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b4-2020-421-2020

Bondaruk, B., Roberts, S. A., & Robertson, C. (2020). Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality. Geomatica, 74(1), 9–30. https: //doi.org/10.1139/geomat-2019-0015

Cheng, C., Tong, X., Chen, B., & Zhai, W. (2016). A subdivision method to unify the existing latitude and longitude grids. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(9), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5090161

Cooper, A. K., van Huyssteen, E., Das, S., Coetzee, M., & Mans, G. (2014). Assessment of spatial data infrastructures. Town and Regional Planning, 64, 65–75.

Dawidowicz, A., & Źróbek, R. (2017). Land administration system for sustainable development: Case study of Poland. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 25(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2017-0008

Gibb, R. (2016). The rHEALPix Discrete Global Grid System. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 34, 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012012

Gibb, R. (2021). Topic 21 - Discrete Global Grid Systems - Part 1 Core Reference system and Operations and Equal Area Earth Reference System (OGC Discussion Paper No. 20-040r3). Open Geospatial Consortium. https://doi.org/10.62973/20-040r3

Goodchild, M. F. (2018). Reimagining the history of GIS. Annals of GIS, 24(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2018.1424737

Goodchild, M. F., Guo, H., Annoni, A., Bian, L., Bie, K., Campbell, F., Craglia, M., Ehlers, M., van Genderen, J., Jackson, D., Lewis, A., Pesaresi, M., Remetey-Fülöpp, G., Simpson, R., Skidmore, A., Wang, C., & Woodgate, P. (2012). Next-eneration Digital Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 11088–11094.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202383109

Hobona, G.,&De Lathouwer, B. (2018). Geospatial standardization of Distributed Ledger Technologies (OGC Discussion Paper No. OGC 18-041r1). Open Geospatial Consortium. http://www.opengis.net/doc/DP/dlt-blockchain-review

Hojati, M., Robertson, C., Roberts, S., & Chaudhuri, C. (2022). GIScience research challenges for realizing discrete global grid systems as a Digital Earth. Big Earth Data, 6(3), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2021.2012912

Jenny, B., Jenny, H., & Räber, S. (2008). Map design for the Internet. In W. Cartwright, G. Gartner, L. Meng, & M. P. Peterson (Eds.), International perspectives on maps and the Internet (pp. 31–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72029-4_3

Kan, B., Zhu, W., Liu, G., Chen, X., Shi, D., & Yu, W. (2017). Topology modeling and analysis of a power grid network using a graph database. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 10(1), 1355–1363. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.10.1.96

Kimerling, A. J., Sahr, K., White, D., & Song, L. (1999). Comparing geometrical properties of global grids. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26(4), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304099782294186

Li, M., & Stefanakis, E. (2020). Geospatial operations of Discrete Global Grid Systems—a comparison with traditional GIS. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-020-00066-3

Ma, T., Zhou, C., Xie, Y., Qin, B., & Ou, Y. (2009). A discrete square global grid system based on the parallels plane projection. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(10), 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802344150

Mahdavi-Amiri, A., Alderson, T., & Samavati, F. (2015). A survey of Digital Earth. Computers & Graphics, 53, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2015.08.005

Peterson, P. R., Percivall, G., Purss, M. B. J., Samavati, F., & Gibb, R. (2015). Discrete Global Grid Systems - A Framework for the next Era in Big Earth Data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2015, IN43B–1729.

Rajabifard, A. (Ed.). (2019). Sustainable Development Goals connectivity dilemma: Land and geospatial information for urban and rural resilience. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429290626

Sahr, K., White, D., & Kimerling, A. J. (2003). Geodesic Discrete Global Grid Systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(2), 121–134. https://doi.org /10.1559/152304003100011090

Silva, I. N., Shiguemori, E. H., & Dietzsch, G. (2025). Designing a parallelogram Discrete Global Grid System for terrestrial cadastral mapping. Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on GeoInformatics.

Snyder, J. P. (1987). Map Projections: A working manual. United States Government Printing Office.

Tobler, W. (1987). Measuring spatial resolution. Proceedings, Land Resources Information Systems Conference, 1, 12–16.

Tong, X. C., Ben, J., Liu, Y. Y., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013). Modeling and expression of vector data in the hexagonal Discrete Global Grid System. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-4/W2, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W2-15-2013

White, D., Kimerling, A. J., Sahr, K., & Song, L. (1998). Comparing area and shape distortion on polyhedral-based recursive partitions of the sphere. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(8), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588198241518

Williamson, I. P., & Enemark, S. (1996). Understanding cadastral maps. Australian Surveyor, 41(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050336.1996.10558593

Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (Eds.). (2010). Land administration for sustainable development. Esri Press.

Yomralioglu, T., & McLaughlin, J. (Eds.). (2017). Cadastre: Geo-information innovations in land administration. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51216-7

Zhou, C., Ma, T., Yang, L., & Qin, B. (2007). Parallels plane projection and its geometric features. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(S1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-007-5011-8

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)