Perceptive and acoustic analysis in forensic phonetics

research in voice disguise

Authors

  • Maria Lucia de Castro Gomes Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR
  • Denise de Oliveira Carneiro Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR
  • Andrea Alves Guimarães Dresch Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DL22-v10n2a2016-7

Keywords:

Perceptive analysis, Acoustic analysis, Forensic phonetics, Voice disguise, Vowel analysis

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to introduce a group of undergraduate students in activities of perceptual and acoustic analysis in a forensic context. A 75-word text  was created to simulate a kidnapping situation. Fifty participants, in groups of ten according to gender and age, were recorded reading the text in a normal voice and then disguising their voice. For the perceptive analysis, we used the VPAS protocol (LAVER 1980; CAMARGO AND MADUREIRA, 2008), and six researchers (judges) analyzed the voices. For the acoustic analysis, we used PRAAT for measuring duration, F0, F1 and F2. Male and female voices were compared and some results confirm some universal trends: vowel intrinsic duration, in which the lower vowels are longer than the higher vowels; female informants have ​​F0, F1 and F2 higher frequency values than males; women have larger vowel spaces than men. The most common settings for voice disguise were: open jaw and lip protrusion, as supra-laryngeal settings, falsetto and harsh voice, as phonation settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Maria Lucia de Castro Gomes, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR

Doutorado em Letras também pela UFPR.

Andrea Alves Guimarães Dresch, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR

Perita Criminal do Instituto de Criminalística do Paraná, lotada na Seção de Perícias Audiovisuais.

References

BEHLAU, M. Voz: O livro do especialista. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2004. Vol. 1.

BELL, A. G. Vowel theories. In: American Journal of Otology, Vol. 1, p. 163-180, 1879.

BRAID, A. C. M. Fonética Forense. Campinas: Millennium, 2003, 2. ed.

CAMARA JR., J. M. Estrutura da língua portuguesa. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2002. 35. ed.

CAMARGO, Z.; MADUREIRA, S. Voice quality analysis from a phonetic perspective: Voice Profile Analysis Scheme Profile for Brazilian Portuguese (BP-VPAS). In: Proceedings Of The Fourth Conference On Speech Prosody. Campinas, 2008.

DAJER, M. E. Análise de Sinais de Voz por padrões visuais da dinâmica vocal. Tese de Doutorado. Programa de Engenharia Elétrica da Escola de Engenharia da USP, 2010.

DUCKWORTH, M.; MCDOUGAL, K.; DE JONG, G.; SHOCKEY, L. Improving the consistency of formant measurement. In: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, Vol. 18.1, 2011, p. 35-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.35

ERIKSSON, A. The Disguised Voice: Imitating Accents or Speech Styles and Impersonating Individuals. In: Language and Identities, 8. Edinburg: Kapitel, 2010. p.86 – 96.

ESCUDERO, P.; BOERSMA, P.; RAUBER, A. S.; BION, R. A. H. A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 126 (3), 2009, 1379–1393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321

ESPINDULA, A. Perícia Criminal e Cível: Uma visão geral para peritos e usuários da perícia. Campinas: Millennium Editora Ltda, 2005, 2. ed.

FANT, G. The Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton, 1960.

GILLIER, R. O disfarce de voz em fonética forense. Master Thesis, Departamento de Linguística Geral e Românica, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Lisboa, 2011.

GOMES, M. L. C.; CARNEIRO, D. O. A fonética forense no Brasil: cenários e atores. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito. Vol. 1(1), 2014. p. 751-754.

GOMES, M. L. C.; RICHERT, L. C.; MALAKOSKI, J. Identificação de locutor na área forense: a importância da pesquisa interdisciplinar. Anais do X Encontro do CELSUL – Círculo de Estudos Linguísticos do Sul UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Cascavel-PR, 2012.

GOLD, E.; FRENCH, P. An International Investigation of Forensic Speaker Comparison. In: ICPhS XVII. Hong Kong, 2011. p. 751-754.

HOLLIEN, H. Forensic Voice Identification. London, UK: Academic Press, 2002.

IAFPA. Proceedings of IAFPA 2015. 24th Annual Conference of the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. Leiden: Leiden University, 2015.

JONES, D. An outline of English phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer, 1962.

KEATING, P. Universal phonetics and the organization of grammars. In: FROMKIN, V. Phonetic Linguistics: essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. New York: Academic Press, 1995. p. 115-132.

KENT, R. D.; READ, C. Acoustic Analysis of Speech. Albany: Singular, 2002. 2. ed.

KINOSHITA, Y., ISHIHARA, S., ROSE, P. Exploring the discriminatory potential of F0 distribution parameters in traditional forensic speaker recognition. Equinox Publishing Online, p. 92, 2009.

KREIMAN, J.; GERRATT, B. R. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality: Review, Tutorial, and a Framework for Future Research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. Vol. 36, p. 21-40, Fev. 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.21

KREIMAN, J.; SIDTIS, D. Foundations of Voice Studies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

KREMER, R. L.; GOMES, M. L. C. A eficiência do disfarce em vozes femininas: uma análise da frequência fundamental. ReVEL, vol. 12, n. 23, 2014.

KREMER, R. L. Fundamental frequency: an analysis of age and gender. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado para conclusão de grau de licenciado no curso de Licenciatura em Letras Português/Inglês da UTFPR Curitiba, 2015.

KÜNZEL, H. J. Effects on voice disguise on speaking fundamental frequency. In: Forensic Linguistics, 7 (2). Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, 2000. p. 149-179.

______. Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: the influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics 8(1) 2001. p. 1350-1771.

LAVER, J. The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

LINDBLOM, B. Vowel duration and a model of lip-mandible coordination. Speech Transmission Laboratory – Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Stockholm, 1, 29.

MADAZIO, G. Diagrama de desvio fonatório na clínica vocal. Tese apresentada à Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina, para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Ciências, 2009.

MARCHAL, A.; REIS, C. Produção da fala. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2012.

MASTER, S. Análise acústica e perceptivo-auditiva da voz de atores e não atores masculinos: Long term average spectrum e o “formante do ator”. Tese de Doutorado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana da Escola Paulista de Medicina da USP, 2005.

MASTHOFF, H. A report on voice disguise experiment. In: Forensic Linguistics, Vol.3 (1), Equinox Publishing Online, UK, 1996, p. 160-167.

MOISIK, S. R. Harsh Voice Quality and Its Association with Blackness in Popular American Media. In: Phonetica, 69, 2012. p. 193-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000351059

NOLAN, F.; GRIGORAS, C. A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification. In: International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 12(2), 2005. p. 143-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/sll.2005.12.2.143

NOLAN, F.; MCDOUGALL, K.; DE JONG, G.; HUDSON, T. The DyViS database: style-controlled recordings of 100 homogeneous speakers for forensic phonetic research. In: International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 16(1), 2009. p. 31-57.

NOLAN, F; MCDOUGALL, K.; HUDSON, T. Some acoustic correlates of perceived (dis)similarity between same-accent voices. In LEE, W. S.; ZEE, E. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 2011, p. 1506-1509.

NOOTEBOOM, S. The Prosody of Speech: Melody and Rhythm. In: HARDCLATLE, W. J.; LAVER, J. The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. p. 640-673.

PIETROFORTE, A. V. A língua como objeto da linguística. In: MUSSALIN, F.; BENTES, A. C. Introdução à Linguística 3: fundamentos epistemológicos. São Paulo: Cortez, 2005. p. 75-93.

ROSE, P. Forensic Speaker Identification. Canberra: Taylor & Francis, 1997.

STEVENS, K. N. Articulatory-Acoustic-Auditory Relationships. In: HARDCLATLE, W. J.; LAVER, J. The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997. p. 462-506.

Published

2016-06-27

How to Cite

GOMES, M. L. de C.; CARNEIRO, D. de O.; DRESCH, A. A. G. Perceptive and acoustic analysis in forensic phonetics: research in voice disguise. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 10, n. 2, p. 559–589, 2016. DOI: 10.14393/DL22-v10n2a2016-7. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31650. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.