GO PISA! Indicators for the elaboration of educational public policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/REPOD-v8n2a2019-49327Keywords:
PISA, Comparative Education, Public PoliciesAbstract
This paper is based on the evaluation of the PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) held in 2015, specifically the collection of data focused on the performance of students and teachers in Brazil, with the aim of presenting indicatives for the possible elaboration of public policies for education in the country. The study is based on the analysis of information, taking as a methodology the guidelines for comparing educational effectiveness with the participating countries and the results obtained with Brazilian students that meet many requirements, especially the federal education network. The analysis demonstrates that investments are necessary in teacher training, infrastructure in schools and definition of the continuity of the means of evaluation through State policies.
Downloads
Metrics
References
BRASIL. Plano Nacional de Educação (2006). Lei Nº 11.274, de 6 de fevereiro de 2006. Disponível em: < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11274.htm> Acesso em : 02 mai. 2019.
BRASIL. Plano Nacional de Educação (2014). Lei Nº 13.005, de 25 de junho de 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l13005.htm> Acesso em: 02 mai. 2019.
CARVALHO, L. M. The Fabrication and Travel of a Knowledge-Policy Instrument. European Educational Research Journal, London, v. 11, n. 2, p. 172-188, 2012.
FERREIRA, M. S. Os Centros de Pesquisas Educacionais do INEP e os estudos em ciências sociais sobre a educação no Brasil. Revista Brasileira deEducação. São Paulo. v. 13 n. 38 maio/ago, p. 279-292, 2008.
MORGAN, C. Constructing the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. In: PEREYA, Miguel (Org.). PISA under Examination: ChangingKnowledge, Changing Tests, and Changing Schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers,2011. P. 47-59.
MOSTAFA, T. PÁL, J. Science teachers’satisfaction: evidence from the PISA 2015 teacher survey. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. (OECD Education Working Papers, n. 168).
OLIVEIRA, D. A.; JORGE, T. S. As Políticas de Avaliação, osDocentes, e a Justiça. Currículo sem Fronteiras, Braga, v. 15, n. 2, p. 346-364,maio/ago. 2015. Disponível em:<http://www.curriculosemfronteiras.org/vol15iss2articles/oliveira-jorge.pdf>. Acesso em: 03 mai. 2019.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. PISA 2015: results: colaborative problem solving. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing, 2017. v.5.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. PISA - Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematical and Financial Literacy, 2015. Disponível em: < https://www.oecd.org/publications/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework-9789264281820-en.htm>. Acesso em: 02 mai. 2019.
PETTERSSON, D. Three Narratives: national interpretations of PISA. Knowledge Cultures, Woodside, v. 2, n. 4, p. 172, 2014.
PINI, G. À Propos de la Théorie des réponses aux items: le casd’itemsdichotomiques. Genebra: Groupe-Edumétrie, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.irdp.ch/data/secure/1952/document/TRI_DICHO.pdf>. Acesso em: 09 mai. 2019.
SCHWARTZMAN, S. Uses and Abuses of Education Assessment in Brazil.Prospects, Paris, v. 43, n. 3, p. 269-288, 2013. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9275-9>. Acesso em: 08mai. 2019.
VILLANI, M. The Production Cycle of PISA Data in Brazil: the history of data beyond the numbers. Sisyphus Journal of Education, Lisboa, v. 6, n. 3,p. 30-52, 2018.
VILLANI, M. OLIVEIRA, D.A. Avaliação Nacional e Internacional noBrasil: os vínculos entre o PISA e o IDEB. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1343-1362, out./dez. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-623684893
