Concessive Comparative Construction “Até que para um palhaço, você escreve legal” as an awkward compliment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/DL48-v15n4a2021-10

Keywords:

Construction Grammar. Mental Space. Blending.

Abstract

In this work, we discuss the activation of presupposition and conceptual blending, based on the Theory of Mental Spaces (FAUCONNIER, 1994, 1997; FAUCONNIER; TURNER, 2002), in the structure we call Concessive-Comparative Construction, outlined as “ATÉ QUE PARA X, Y” and instantiated in instances like “Até que pra um avô você ainda está em forma, hein”. Following the socio-cognitive contribution from Construction Grammar (GOLDBERG, 1995, 2006; FILLMORE, LEE-GOLDMAN & RHOMIEUX, 2012), based on a theoretical-methodological approach based on use, with a database formed by authentic occurrences taken from the internet, we aim to legitimize the Concessive-Comparative Construction as an evaluative resource of the language that can promote veiled criticism. After empirical analysis of the data, we point out that this construction seems to promote a process of conceptual blending, which relates scales between mental spaces and promotes the emergence of an ad hoc category, in which the assessment made is relative to a group of expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Gabriela da Silva Pires, UFV

Doutora em Linguística e professora do Departamento de Letras da Universidade Federal de Viçosa/MG

Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha, UFJF

Doutor em Linguística e professor do Departamento de Letras da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora/MG

References

COULSON, S. Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551352

CROFT, W.; CRUSE, D. A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864

DIEMER, S. Corpus Linguistics with Google?. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English. International Society for the Linguistics of English. Boston, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.bu.edu/isle/files/2012/01/Stefan-Diemer-Corpus-Linguistics-with-Google.pdf. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2016.

FAUCONNIER, G. Pragmatic entailment and questions. In: SEARLE, J.; KIEFER, F.; BIERWISCH, M. (org.). Speech act theory and pragmatics. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_3

FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624582

FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220

FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

FILLMORE, C. J. Frame semantics. In: Linguistics in the morning calm. Selected papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company, 1982.

FILLMORE, C.; KAY, P.; O’CONNOR, M. C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, Vol 64, No 3, p. 501-538, 1988. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/414531

FILLMORE, C.; LEE-GOLDMAN, R.; RHOMIEUX, R. The FrameNet Constructicon. In: BOAS, H.; SAG, I. (org.). Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2012.

GOLDBERG, A. Construction: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

GOLDBERG, A. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: The Oxford University Press, 2006.

PINHEIRO, D. Um modelo gramatical para a linguística funcional-cognitiva: da Gramática de Construções para a Gramática de Construções Baseada no Uso. In: ALVARO, P. T.; FERRARI, L. (org.). Linguística Cognitiva: da linguagem aos bastidores da mente. Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ: Brasil Multicultural, 2016.

SALOMÃO, M. M. M. Gramática das Construções: a questão da integração entre sintaxe e léxico. Veredas- revista de estudos linguísticos. v. 6, n. 1. jan/jun.2002. Juiz de Fora: Editora UFJF, 2003. Disponível em: https://www.ufjf.br/revistaveredas/files/2009/12/cap042.pdf . Acesso em: 31 dez. 2020.

SALOMÃO, M. M. M. Tudo certo como dois e dois são cinco: todas as construções de uma língua. In: MIRANDA, N. S.; SALOMÃO, M. M. M. (org.). Construções do português do Brasil: da gramática ao discurso. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2009.

SWEETSER, E.; FAUCONNIER, G. Cognitive links and domains: basic aspects of mental space theory. In: FAUCONNIER, G.; SWEETSER, E. (org.). Spaces, worlds, and grammars. Chicago University Press: Chicago, 1996.

Published

2021-12-21

How to Cite

PIRES, G. da S.; ROCHA, L. F. M. Concessive Comparative Construction “Até que para um palhaço, você escreve legal” as an awkward compliment. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1180–1214, 2021. DOI: 10.14393/DL48-v15n4a2021-10. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/58710. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.