The impact of collaborative planning of an oral task on learners’ language performance in an EFL context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/DL47-v15n3a2021-3Keywords:
TBLT, Oral task, Strategic planningAbstract
Learning a new language is permeated by several cognitive processes which are believed to demand a high load of attentional resources during oral performance (SKEHAN, 2014). Strategic (ELLIS, 2005) and collaborative planning (SWAIN, 2000) appear as an alternative to lower these demands. In the light of Task Based Language Teaching (TBLT) (COOK, 2011; EAST, 2017) and aiming at contributing to this background, in this study, an oral task was elaborated with the purpose to analyze the performance of basic speakers of English as a Foreign Language from a language course in an oral task under two different conditions: after individual and collaborative strategic planning. Fourteen students were divided into two groups: four pairs planned collaboratively, and six students planned individually. Both groups had ten minutes to plan, followed by a few minutes to record their messages. Participants also answered a perception questionnaire concerning the activity. Statistical results indicated that students performing under the peer-planning condition had higher scores in all three measures of adequacy: organization, convincingness, and clarity than students performing under the individual-planning condition, which was confirmed by the results of the independent t-test. Furthermore, qualitative results showed that most students appeared to enjoy the task, especially the ones who performed under the peer-planning condition. These contributions bring important implications for classroom, allowing teachers to acknowledge collaborative strategic planning as a valuable tool.
Downloads
Metrics
References
COOK, V. Linguistic relativity and language teaching. In: COOK, V.; BASSETTI, B. (ed.). Language and bilingual cognition. New York: Psychology Press, 2011. p. 509-518. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836859
D’ELY, R. C. S. F. A Focus on four metacognitive processes: the impact of strategic planning, repetition, strategic planning plus repetition, and strategic planning for repetition on L2 oral performance. 2006. 359 f. Dissertation (Doctoral Program in English). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2006.
D’ELY, R.; MOTA, M.; BYGATE, M. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance: Implications for EFL learners’ speech production. In: WEN, Z.; AHMADIAN, M. J. (ed.) Researching L2 task performance and Pedagogy. In honour of Peter Skehan. John Benjamins, 2019. p. 199-228. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.10del
DORNYEI, Z. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
EAST, M. Research into practice: The task-based approach to instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, v. 50, n. 3, p. 412–424, 2017. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481700009X
ELLIS, R. Task-Based Language Teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 19, n. 3, p. 221–246, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
ELLIS, R. Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In: ELLIS, R. (ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language. John Benjamins, 2005. p. 3-36. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11
FOSTER, P.; SKEHAN, P. The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), p. 299−324, 1996. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
GUARÁ-TAVARES, M. G. Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance. 2008. 222 f. Dissertation (Doctoral Program in English). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2008.
LARSON-HALL, J. A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York and London: Routledge, 2010. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875964
LIGHTBOWN, P. M.; SPADA, N. How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
LONG, M. H. Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In: LAMBERT, R. L.; SHOHAMY, E. (ed.). Language policy and pedagogy. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2000. p. 179-192. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/z.96.11lon
MEHNERT, U. The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, v. 20, p. 83-108, 1998. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001041
PALLOTTI, G. CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, v. 30, n. 4, p. 590-601, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp045
RICHARDS, J. C. Interchange 2. 5th Edition. Cambridge: CUP, 2017.
SKEHAN, P. Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In: SKEHAN, P. (ed.). Task-Based Language Teaching: Processing Perspectives on Task Performance. John Benjamins, 2014. p. 211-260. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.08ske
SKEHAN P. Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, v. 30, n 4, p. 510–532, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
SKEHAN, P. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900209
SKEHAN, P. A framework for implementation of Task-Based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, p. 62-138, 1996. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38
SOUZA, A. C. W. Basic level students and focus-on-form: a study in a public school. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONALDA ABRAPUI, 1, 2007, Belo Horizonte. Anais. Belo Horizonte: Federal University of Minas Gerais, 2007.
SPECHT, A. L. Is strategic planning enough? Investigating the impact of two types of strategic instruction on students’ oral planned performance. 2017. 181 f. Dissertation (Doctoral Program in English). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2017.
SWAIN, M. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In: LANTOLF, J. (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. p. 97-114.
SWAIN, M. Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review. v. 58, n. 1, p. 44-63, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.58.1.44
SWAIN, M.; LAPKIN, S. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, v. 82, n. 3, p. 338-356, 1998. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
SWAIN, M.; LAPKIN, S. Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to formulation. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 37, n. 3-4, p. 285-304, 2002. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
TAVAKOLI, P.; FOSTER, P. Task Design and Second Language Performance: The Effect of Narrative Type on Learner Output. Language Learning, v. 61, p. 37-72, 2008. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00642.x
VAN DEN BRANDEN, K. Task-Based Language Education: from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282
VAN DEN BRANDEN, K.; BYGATE, M.; NORRIS, J. Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1
WANG, Z. On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In: SKEHAN, P. (ed.) Processing Perspectives on Task Performance. John Benjamins, 2014. p. 27-62. DOI https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
XHAFAJ, D. C. P. One is good, two is better: Investigating the impact of peer-planning in the oral performance of intermediate L2 English learners. 2013. 117 f. Undergraduate Dissertation (Undergraduate degree in Languages - English). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2013.
XHAFAJ, D. C. P.; MUCK, K. E.; D’ELY, R. C. S. F. The Impact of individual and peer planning on the oral performance of advanced learners of English as a Foreign Language. Linguagem & Ensino, v. 14, n. 1, p. 39-65, 2011.
ZACCARON, R. The More the Merrier (?): the impact of Individual and Collaborative Strategic Planning on Performance of an Oral Task by Young Learners of English as an L2 in Brazil. 2018. 212 f. Thesis (Master’s Program in English). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2018a.
ZACCARON, R. Again and again: an immediate repetition oral task viewed in light of Swain’s output hypothesis. Domínios de Lingu@gem, v. 12, n. 3, p. 1401-1427, 21 set. 2018b. DOI https://doi.org/10.14393/DL35-v12n3a2018-2
ZACCARON, R.; XHAFAJ, D. C. P.; D’ELY, R. C. S. F. “Hang on a sec, teacher”: collaborative and individual strategic planning as a means to perform L2 oral tasks at a public school. Ilha do Desterro, [S.I.], v. 72, n. 3, p. 401-426, oct. 2019. DOI https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2019v72n3p401
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Lima Terres, Marilia Camponogara Torres, Ana Flávia Boeing Marcelino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain the copyright and waiver the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), allowing the sharing of work with authorship recognition and preventing its commercial use.
Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
