Clinical efficacy and safety of anthroposophic therapies in dentistry: a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v42n0a2026-81069

Keywords:

Anthroposophy, Anthroposophic medicine, Complementary therapies, Dentistry, Forensic Dentistry, Systematic review.

Abstract

Integrative and complementary practices have been incorporated into healthcare in Brazil, including approaches applied to dentistry. Among them, anthroposophic dentistry is presenting increasing clinical interest, although its evidence base remains poorly established. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anthroposophic therapies applied to dental patients. This systematic review followed the recommendations of the PRISMA 2020. It included clinical studies employing anthroposophic interventions in dentistry compared to conventional treatments, other integrative practices, or placebo. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, and LILACS databases were searched, as well as the gray literature (ProQuest), without any restriction on date or language. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The review identified 7,988 records. After screening and full-text reading, no studies met the eligibility criteria. The main reasons for exclusion included the absence of an anthroposophic intervention applied to dentistry, inadequate design, or outcomes inconsistent with the research question. No studies evaluating the clinical efficacy or safety of anthroposophic therapies in dentistry were found. The lack of evidence demonstrates a significant gap in this field, underscoring the urgent need for well-designed primary studies that support the use of these practices based on scientific rigor.

References

ALDERSON, P. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 2004, 328, 476–477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.476.

AROMATARIS, E.; MUNN, Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute, 2020. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.

BARRIÈRE, J.; et al. Scientific integrity requires publishing rebuttals and clarifications. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-022-10465-2.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Política Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares no SUS – PNPIC. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2006. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pnpic.pdf.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria nº 1.984, de 20 de outubro de 2012. Aprova a Relação Nacional de Ações e Serviços de Saúde – RENASES. Diário Oficial da União. 2012. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2012/prt1984_20_10_2012.html.

CFO. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Resolução CFO-118, de 11 de maio de 2012. Aprova o Código de Ética Odontológica. Diário Oficial da União. 2012. https://website.cfo.org.br/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/codigo_etica.pdf.

CFO. Conselho Federal de Odontologia. Resolução CFO-165, de 10 de julho de 2015. Reconhece a Odontologia Antroposófica como prática integrativa e complementar. Diário Oficial da União. 2015.

FERES, M.; FERES, M.F.N. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2023, 31, ed001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2023-ed001.

FERREIRA, J.R.M.; et al. Psiconeurodontologia, (bio)decodificação dental e os mil e um nomes para o charlatanismo odontológico no século XXI: uma revisão de escopo. Revista Brasileira de Odontologia Legal. 2023, 10, 02–17. https://doi.org/10.21117/rbol-v10n22023-510.

GALITESI, C.R.L.; ANDRADE, F.B.; BORGES, A.F.S. Pain and disease according to integral anthroposophical dentistry. Brazilian Oral Research. 2012, 26, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000700009.

GRAY, R. Empty systematic reviews: identifying gaps in knowledge or a waste of time and effort? Nurse Author & Editor. 2021, 31, 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.23.

HOWICK, J. The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

KIENLE, G.S.; et al. Anthroposophic medicine: an integrative medical system originating in Europe. Global Advances in Health and Medicine. 2013, 2, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2012.087.

NOSEK, B.A.; et al. Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology. 2022, 73, 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157.

PAGE, M. J.; MCKENZIE, J. E.; BOSSUYT, P. M.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

PLOESSER, M.; MARTIN, D. The effects of anthroposophic medicine in chronic pain conditions: a systematic review. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. 2023, 29, 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2022.0723.

POPPER, K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2005.

SACKETT, D.L.; et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996, 312, 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.

SCHWERMER, M.; et al. Anthroposophic medicine in the treatment of pediatric pseudocroup: a systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2018, 40, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.09.001.

SIMÕES, S.C.R. Odontologia integrativa: abordagem sistêmica na odontologia. Revista Fitos. 2020, 14, 407–409. http://revistafitos.far.fiocruz.br/index.php/revista-fitos/article/view/921.

SOUZA, D.V.L.; OLIVEIRA, I.M. Pseudociências e os desafios atuais impostos ao ensino de ciências. Educação & Realidade. 2024, 49, e121157. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236121157vs01.

SHAMSEER, L.; MOHER, D.; CLARKE, M.; et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015, 350, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.

STEINER, R. Fundamentos de la medicina de orientación antroposófica. Madrid: Editorial Rudolf Steiner S.L., 2010.

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2025–2034. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/traditional-complementary-and-integrative-medicine/global-strategies.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Health Sciences

How to Cite

Clinical efficacy and safety of anthroposophic therapies in dentistry: a systematic review. Bioscience Journal [online], 2026. [online], vol. 42, pp. e42013. [Accessed20 May 2026]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v42n0a2026-81069. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/81069.