Integrated Pedagogical Strategies in Health Sciences Higher Education: The Influence of Combining Traditional Teaching Methods and Three-Dimensional Technological Resources on Human Anatomy Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
The advancement of digital technologies has expanded teaching and learning opportunities in higher education, particularly in visually complex fields such as Human Anatomy. This study compared the academic performance of health sciences students exposed to three pedagogical strategies in the discipline of Anatomical Bases of Organs and Systems: traditional teaching (TT), three-dimensional technological resources (TR), and traditional teaching combined with technological resources (TT+TR). Academic performance was assessed through the final course grade, composed of theoretical and practical examinations. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. The TT+TR group demonstrated superior performance compared with the TT and TR groups (p<0.001), whereas TT and TR showed similar results. These findings suggest that integrating traditional and technological methodologies may enhance anatomical learning in health sciences higher education.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published works are the property of their authors, who may make use of them for subsequent publications, always including the original edition (original title, Ensino em Re-Vista, volume, number, pages). All articles in this journal are the sole responsibility of their authors, and no legal responsibility for their content rests with the Journal or EDUFU.
How to Cite
References
ALMEN, Josie et al. Student and educator perceptions of asynchronous anatomical education and a digital anatomy learning resource. In: Enhancing Biomedical Education: Integrating Digital Visualization and 3D Technologies. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. p. 43-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73270-6_3.
FONSECA, Guilherme Reis Borges Coelho; TIPOE, George Lim; GANOTICE JR, Fraide Augustin. Comparing the outcomes of the technology‐enhanced learning of sectional anatomy with and without preceding demonstrations: A study about the worked‐example effect in anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70267.
DOS REIS BORGES COELHO DA FONSECA, Guilherme; YANG, Jian; CECOT, Tomasz Stanislaw. The effectiveness and required mental effort of using virtual reality in anatomy learning. In: Anatomical Society Summer Meeting 2023 (25/07/2023-27/08/2023, Bangor, United Kingdom). Wiley, 2023.
GHOSH, Sanjib Kumar. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anatomical Sciences Education, v. 10, n. 3, p. 286-299, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1649.
GHOSH, Sanjib Kumar. Paying respect to human cadavers: We owe this to the first teacher in anatomy. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, v. 211, p. 129-134, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.02.004.
GHOSH, Sanjib Kumar; KUMAR, Ashutosh. Building professionalism in human dissection room as a component of hidden curriculum delivery: a systematic review of good practices. Anatomical Sciences Education, v. 12, n. 2, p. 210-221, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1836.
KEENAN, Iain D.; BEN AWADH, Abdullah. Integrating 3D visualisation technologies in undergraduate anatomy education. Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 1, p. 39-53, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_4.
KEENAN, Iain D.; POWELL, Megan. Interdimensional travel: visualisation of 3D-2D transitions in anatomy learning. In: Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. p. 103-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_6.
LIM, Kah Heng Alexander et al. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anatomical sciences education, v. 9, n. 3, p. 213-221, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573.
MARTIN, Jason. Evaluating Learning Resource Selection to Support Gross Anatomy Education. 2023. Tese de Doutorado. Colorado State University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25675/3.04878.
MCMENAMIN, Paul G. et al. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, v. 7, n. 6, p. 479-486, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475.
ORGAN, Jason M.; COMER, Amber R. Evolution of a discipline: The changing face of anatomy. The Anatomical Record, v. 305, n. 4, p. 766-771, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24901.
ORGAN, Jason M. et al. Personal autonomy and self‐determination are crucial for professionalism in healthcare. Anatomical sciences education, v. 16, n. 4, p. 571-573, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2278.
ROSA, Bruno Barbosa et al. Metodologias de ensino aplicadas à Anatomia Humana: uma revisão narrativa. REVISTA DELOS, v. 18, n. 71, p. e6856-e6856, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/rdelosv18.n71-155.
SMITH, Claire F.; FINN, Gabrielle M.; BORDER, Scott. Learning clinical anatomy. Eur J Anat, v. 21, n. 4, p. 269-278, 2017.