Same nature, different values: the relational dimension in the valuation of ecosystem services
PDF-pt (Portuguese)
PDF-en

Keywords

Ecosystem services
Relational values
Sentipensar
Pedra Branca Massif

How to Cite

PENA, Ingrid Almeida de Barros; PINTO, Helena Neri Alves; LATAWIEC, Agnieszka Ewa. Same nature, different values: the relational dimension in the valuation of ecosystem services. Sociedade & Natureza, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 1, 2025. DOI: 10.14393/SN-v37-2025-78576. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/78576. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.

Abstract

In recent decades, the ecosystem services approach has gained prominence in the field of environmental conservation by highlighting the connection between human well-being and ecosystem functions. However, critics have pointed out that the predominance of utilitarian and monetary assessments often overlooks the sociocultural and affective values that different social groups attribute to nature. This article explores the relational dimension in the valuation of ecosystem services through the experiences of the Quilombola communities of Cafundá Astrogilda and Dona Bilina, located in the Pedra Branca State Park (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The research adopted an interpretivist and sentipensante methodology, combining action research, interviews, and territorial immersion to understand the communities’ perceptions and values regarding nature. Building on the experiences investigated, this study contends that the ecosystem services framework must transcend utilitarian and monetary paradigms. Recognizing the centrality of relational values — such as care, reciprocity, ancestry, and spirituality — in shaping these communities’ relationships with the forest is essential for advancing equitable and enduring conservation efforts. By foregrounding practices and worldviews that conceive of nature as a principle of life, a locus of spiritual connection, and a source of knowledge, this research establishes the basis for a more integrated and pluralistic approach within the field. Such a perspective not only fosters the development of fairer and more culturally grounded conservation practices but also constitutes an act of intellectual decolonization — one capable of informing social policies and institutional decision-making toward the resolution of socio-environmental conflicts through the recognition of cultural and epistemic diversity.

PDF-pt (Portuguese)
PDF-en

References

BASTIDAS AGUILAR, L. Sentipensar el pluriverso: Legado del maestro Orlando Fals Borda para la sub-version, la utopía y el buen vivir. Collectivus, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, v. 7, n. 1, p. 63-74, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15648/Collectivus.vol7num1.2020.2532

BISPO DOS SANTOS, A. A terra dá, a terra quer. São Paulo: Ubu Editora/ PISEAGRAMA, 2023.

BISPO DOS SANTOS. Colonização, quilombos: modos e significações. INCTI/UnB/INCT/CNPq/MCTI, Brasília, 2015.

BORDA, F. A Sentipensante Sociology for Latin America (Una sociología sentipensante para América Latina). Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores; Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015. Disponível em: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/ar/libros/coedicion/fborda/27053622/AntologiaFalsBorda.pdf. Acessado em: fev. 18, 2023.

BÜSCHER, B.; FLETCHER, R. Towards Convivial Conservation. Conservation & Society, v. 17, n. 3, p. 283–296, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_75

CAMPANHA, M. M. PEDREIRA, B. da C. C. G.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; PARRON, L. M.; PRADO, R. B.; BERGIER, I; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; FERRAZ, R. P. D.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; TONUCCI, R. G.; SILVA, G. B. S. da; Serviços ecossistêmicos: histórico e evolução. In: FERRAZ, R. P. D.; PRADO, R. B.; PARRON, L. M.; CAMPANHA, M. M. Marco Referencial em Serviços Ecossistêmicos. Brasília (DF): Embrapa, 2019. p. 37-54.

COLLOFF, M. J.; LAVOREL, S.; VAN KERKHOFF, L. E.; WYBORN, C. A.; FAZEY, I.; GORDDARD, R.; MACE, G. M.; FODEN, W. B.; DUNLOP, M.; PRENTICE, I. C.; CROWLEY, J.; LEADLEY, P.; DEGEORGES, P. Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world. Conservation Biology, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1008-1017, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12912

DÍAZ, S.; DEMISSEW, S.; CARABIAS, J.; JOLY, C.; LONSDALE, M.; ASH, N.; LARIGAUDERIE, A.; ADHIKARI, J. R.; ARICO, S.; BÁLDI, A.; BARTUSKA, A.; BASTE, I. A.; BILGIN, A.; BRONDIZIO, E.; CHAN, K. M. A.; FIGUEROA, V. E.; DURAIAAPPAH, A.; FISCHER, M.; HILL, R.; KOETZ, T.; LEADLEY, P.; LYVER, P.; MACE, G. M.; MARTIN-LOPEZ, B.; OKUMURA, M.; PACHECO, D.; PASCUAL, U.; PÉREZ, E. S.; REYERS, B.; ROTH, E.; SAITO, O.; SCHOLES, R. J.; SHARMA, N.; TALLIS, H.; THAMAN, R.; WATSON, R.; YAHARA, T.; ABDUL HAMID, Z.; AKOSIM, C.; AL-HAFEDH, Y.; ALLAHVERDIYEV, R.; AMANKWAH, E.; ASAH, S. T.; ASFÁW, Z.; BARTUS, G.; BROOKS, L. A.; CAILLAUX, J.; DALLE, G.; DARNAEDI, D.; DRIVER, A.; ERPUL, G.; ESCOBAR-EYZAGUIRRE, P.; FAILLER, P.; FOUDA, A. M. M.; FU, B.; GUNDIMEDA, H.; HASHIMOTO, S.; HOMER, F.; LAVOREL, S.; LICHTENSTEIN, G.; MALA, W. A.; MANDIVENYI, W.; MATCZAK, P.; MBIZVO, C.; MEHRDADI, M.; METZGER, J. P.; MIKISSA, J. B.; MOLLER, H.; MOONEY, H. A.; MUMBY, P.; NAGENDRA, H.; NESSHOVER, C.; OTENG-YEBOAH, A. A.; PATAKI, G.; ROUÉ, M.; RUBIS, J.; SCHULTZ, M.; SMITH, P.; SUMAILA, R.; TAKEUCHI, K.; THOMAS, S.; VERMA, M.; YEO-CHANG, Y.; ZLATANOVA, D. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

DIEGUES, A. C. A. O mito moderno da natureza intocada. 4 ed. São Paulo: Editora HUCITEC, 2002.

ESCOBAR, A. Sentipensar con la Tierra: Las Luchas Territoriales y la Dimensión Ontológica de las Epistemologías del Sur. AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana v. 11, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2016. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102

GUIBRUNET, L.; GERRITSEN, P. R. W.; SIERRA-HUELSZ, J. A.; FLORES-DÍAZ, A. C.; GARCÍA-FRAPOLLI, E.; GARCÍA-SERRANO, E.; PASCUAL, U.; BALVANERA, P. Beyond participation: How to achieve the recognition of local communities’ value-systems in conservation? Some insights from Mexico. People and Nature, v. 3, n. 3, p. 528-541, June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10203

HIMES, A.; MURACA, B. Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 3, n.1, p. 1–7, jan.-abr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005

INTERGOVERNMENTAL SCIENCE-POLICY PLATFORM ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES [IPBES]. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages, 2019. Disponível em: https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2025.

KRENAK, A. A vida não é útil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020.

LATERRA, P.; NAHUELHUAL, L.; VALLEJOS, M.; BERROUET, L.; ARROYO PÉREZ, E.; ENRICO, L.; JIMÉNEZ-SIERRA, C.; MEJÍA, K.; MELI, P.; RINCÓN-RUÍZ, A.; SALAS, D.; ŠPIRIĆ, J.; VILLEGAS, J. C.; VILLEGAS-PALACIO, C. Linking inequalities and ecosystem services in Latin America. Ecosystem Services, v. 36, abr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.001

LAW, J. What’s Wrong with a One-World World. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, v. 16, n. 1, p. 126–139, 2015. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066.

MANFREDO, M. J.; BRUSKOTTER, J. T.; TEEL, T. L.; FULTON, D.; SCHWARTZ, S. H.; ARLINGHAUS, R.; OISHI, S.; USKUL, A. K.; REDFORD, K.; KITAYAMA, S.; SULLIVAN, L. Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conservation Biology, 2017, v. 31, n. 4, p. 772-780. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12855

MIGNOLO, W. D.; WALSH, C. On Decoloniality. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371779

MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT (MEA). Ecosystems and human well-being: global assessment reports. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.

MONCAYO, V. M. Presentación. Fals Borda: hombre hicotea y sentipensante. In: BORDA, F. Una sociología sentipensante para América Latina. antología y presentación: MONCAYO, V. M. México, D. F.: Siglo XXI Editores; Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015, p. 9-19. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/201510

RAMOS, J. G. Sentipensar la sustentabilidad: Decolonialidad y afectos en el pensamiento latinoamericano reciente. A Contracorriente: Una Revista De Estudios Latinoamericanos, v. 17, n. 2, p. 114–127, 2020. Disponível em: https://acontracorriente.chass.ncsu.edu/index.php/acontracorriente/article/view/2023023. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2025.

SCHROTER, M.; VAN DER ZANDEN, E. H.; VAN OUDENHOVEN, A. P. E.; REMME, R. P.; SERNA-CHAVEZ, H. M.; DE GROOT, R. S.; OPDAM, P. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters, v. 7, n. 6, p. 514-523, nov./dec. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12091

SCHWARTZ S. H. A theory of cultural value orientations: explication and applications. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, v. 5, p. 137– 182, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357

SERTÃO CARIOCA. Registro realizado em março de 2022 no âmbito do Projeto Sertão Carioca. Instagram, 21 mar. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.instagram.com/p/CbaOzzoDb9s/. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2025.

STÅLHAMMAR, S. Reconnecting with nature through concepts: on the construction of values in the ecosystem services paradigm. 220f. Tese de Doutorado. (Faculty of Social Sciences). Lund University, Suécia, 2020. Disponível em: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/files/73252373/Sanna_St_lhammar_WEBB.pdf. Acesso em: 14 out. 2025.

TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, edited by Pushpam Kumar. London and Washington, DC: Earthscan, 2010.

ZAFRA-CALVO, N.; BALVANERA, P.; PASCUAL, U.; MERÇON, J.; MARTÍN-LÓPEZ, B.; VAN NOORDWIJK, M.; MWAMPAMBA, T. H.; LELE, S.; IFEJIKA SPERANZA, C.; ARIAS-ARÉVALO, P.; CABROL, D.; CÁCERES, D. M.; O'FARRELL, P.; MAZHENCHERY SUBRAMANIAN, S.; DEVY, S.; KRISHNAN, S.; CARMENTA, R.; GUIBRUNET, L.; KRAUS-ELSIN, Y.; MOERSBERGER, H.; DÍAZ, S. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: Insights from the Global South. Global Environmental Change, v. 63, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Ingrid Almeida de Barros Pena, Helena Neri Alves Pinto, Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.