Keywords
Professional profile
Training
How to Cite
Abstract
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) practice demands interactions between different actors, and its effectiveness depends on how they respond to their own expectations, as well as the expectations of other actors and legal standards. Thus, EIA practitioners play an important role in improving this process. This study examines the profile of Brazilian EIA practitioners who participated in at least one edition of the Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação de Impacto (CBAI - Brazilian Congress on Impact Assessment in English), as well as their perception of EIA practice within the country. It is a quantitative and qualitative research based on the premise that EIA practitioners would have participated in at least one of the first five congresses (CBAI) promoted by the Associação Brasileira de Avaliação de Impacto (ABAI - Brazilian Association for Impact Assessment in English). Data collection involved distributing an online questionnaire, available between September 26th and November 1st, 2022, to all 794 contacts registered at ABAI. A total of 217 responses were obtained, with participants comprising 48% men and 52% women, with the majority falling between 25 and 45 years of age. All respondents had studied EIA (through undergraduate or postgraduate courses, or in other contexts). Most participants had more than 10 years of experience working with EIA, primarily in consultancy and academia. Perceptions regarding the quality, problems, strengths and opportunities of Brazilian EIA practice generally aligned with the literature. Respondents tended to disagree with streamlining EIA and Environmental Licensing procedures and to agree with the necessity of implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in Brazil. The results are important to understand who Brazilian EIA practitioners are and what this portion of EIA practitioners think.
References
ALMEIDA, M. R. R.; MONTAÑO, M. The effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment systems in São Paulo and Minas Gerais states. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 20, p. 77-104, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC235R2V2022017
ALMEIDA, M. R. R.; MALVESTIO, A. C.; VERONEZ, F. A. Teaching impact assessment: applying indicators of best practice principles to Brazil. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 40, n. 1, p. 27-37, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2021.1968263
ALMEIDA, M. R. R.; VERONEZ, F. A.; MALVESTIO, A. C. O Ensino da Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental no Brasil: será só um ‘Faz de Conta’? Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 25, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210020r1vu2022L2AO
ABAI - Associação Brasileira de Avaliação de Impacto. Estatuto Social. 2021. Disponível em: https://avaliacaodeimpacto.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Estatuto-ABAI-atualizado11-2.pdf. Acesso: 20 nov. 2023.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
BLICHARSKA, M.; ISAKSSON, K.; RICHARDSON, T.; WU, C. Context dependency and stakeholder involvement in EIA: the decisive role of practitioners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v. 54, n. 3, p. 337-354, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.506077
BOND, A. J.; FISCHER, T. B. Characterising the collaboration between academia and practice in UK environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 97, p. 106899, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106899
CONAMA – Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução n° 1, de 23 de janeiro de 1986. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Brasília, 1986.
CONAMA – Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução n° 237, de 19 de dezembro de 1997. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Brasília, 1997.
CRUZ, F. B.; VERONEZ, F. A.; MONTAÑO, M. Evidence of learning processes in EIA systems. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 36, n. 3, p. 242-252, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1445177
DUARTE, C. G.; DIBO, A. P. A.; SIQUEIRA-GAY, J.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Practitioners’ perceptions of the Brazilian environmental impact assessment system: results from a survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 35, n. 4, p. 293-309, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1322813
ENRÍQUEZ-DE-SALAMANCA, A. Environmental assessment: a third division subject at the university. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 37, n. 5, p. 452-454, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1589773
ENRÍQUEZ-DE-SALAMANCA, A. Simplified environmental impact assessment processes: review and implementation proposals. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 90, p. 106640, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106640
FISCHER, T. B.; GONZÁLEZ, A. (Ed.). Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909937.00009
FISCHER, T. B.; FONSECA, A.; GEIßLER, G.; JHA-THAKUR, U.; RETIEF, F.; ALBERTS, R.; JIRICKA-PÜRRER, A. Simplification of environmental and other impact assessments–results from an international online survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 41, n. 3, p. 181-189, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2023.2198839
FONSECA, A.; GIBSON, R. B. Testing an ex-ante framework for the evaluation of impact assessment laws: Lessons from Canada and Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 81, p. 106355, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106355
FONSECA, A.; RODRIGUES, S. E. The attractive concept of simplicity in environmental impact assessment: Perceptions of outcomes in southeastern Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 67, p. 101-108, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.09.001
FONSECA, A.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; RIBEIRO, J. C. J. Reforming EIA systems: A critical review of proposals in Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 62, p. 90-97, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.10.002
FONSECA, A. Epilogue (The future of impact prediction: what to expect from EIA in the next 50 years?). In: FONSECA, A. Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2022. p. 471.
IAIA; IEA - International Association for Impact Assessment; Institute of Environmental Assessment. Princípios da melhor prática em avaliação do impacto ambiental. 1999. Disponível em: https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/IAIA_Principios_pt.pdf. Acesso: 24 jan. 2024.
IAIA - International Association for Impact Assessment. ABOUT IAIA. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.iaia.org/more-about-iaia.php. Acesso: 20 nov. 2023.
KÅGSTRÖM, M.; RICHARDSON, T. Space for action: How practitioners influence environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 54, p. 110-118, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.06.003
KÅGSTRÖM, M. Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: How consultants guide quality in environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 60, p. 169-175, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.003
KÅGSTRÖM, M.; FAITH-ELL, C.; LONGUEVILLE, A. Exploring researcher’ roles in collaborative spaces supporting learning in environmental assessment in Sweden. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 99, p. 106990, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106990
KHAN, M. et al. Challenges to EIA consultants whilst dealing with stakeholders in Punjab, Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 73, p. 201-209, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2018.09.001
KHAN, M.; CHAUDHRY, M. N.; AHMAD, S. R.; SAIF, S.; MEHMOOD, A. Performance of EIA authority and effectiveness of EIA system in Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 81, p. 106357, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106357
MA, J.; DUINKER, P. N.; WALKER, T. R. Scholar and practitioner views on science in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 36, n. 6, p. 516-528, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2018.1519978
MALVESTIO, A. C.; MONTAÑO, M. From medicine to poison: how flexible strategic environmental assessment may be? Lessons from a non-regulated SEA system. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 37, n. 5, p. 437-451, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1574390
MONTAÑO, M.; TSHIBANGU, G. M.; MALVESTIO, A. C. Strategic environmental assessment in Brazil: an endangered species? In: FISCHER, T. B.; GONZÁLEZ, A. (Ed.). Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. p. 363-373. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909937.00037
MORGAN, R. K. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 30, p. 5–14, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
MORGAN, R. K.; HART, A.; FREEMAN, C.; COUTTS, B.; COLWILL, D.; HUGHES, A. Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 32, n. 1, p. 11-24, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.002
MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; BAILEY, J. Practitioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management, v. 31, p. 683-695, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-2709-z
MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; BAILEY, M. Appraising the role of relationships between regulators and consultants for effective EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 29, n. 5, p. 284-294, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.006
MPF – Ministério Público Federal. Deficiências em Estudos de Impacto Ambiental: síntese de uma experiência. Brasília: 4ª Câmara de Coordenação e Revisão, Escola Superior do Ministério Público da União, 2004.
NITA, A.; FINERAN, S.; ROZYLOWICZ, L. Researchers' perspective on the main strengths and weaknesses of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 92, p. 106690, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106690
NOBLE, B. F. Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 29, n. 1, p. 66-75, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004
PATTON, M. Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage, 2002.
POPE, J.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Collaboration between academic and non-academic actors in EIA: Reflections from Western Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 97, p. 106910, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106910
RAVN BOESS, E. Practitioners’ pursuit of change: A theoretical framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 98, p. 106928, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106928
RUNHAAR, H.; GOMMERS, A.; VERHAEGEN, K.; COOMAN, K.; CORENS, P. The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders: An analysis of practitioner perspectives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 76, p. 113-119, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.006
RUARO, R.; FERRANTE, L.; FEARNSIDE, P. M. Brazil's doomed environmental licensing. Science, v. 372, n. 6546, p. 1049-1050, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj4924
SADLER, B. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Final Report. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the International Association for Impact Assessment, 1996.
SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Por que não avança a avaliação ambiental estratégica no Brasil? Estudos avançados, v. 31, n. 89, p. 167-183, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.31890015
SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; MITCHELL, R. Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 62, p. 195-204, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.001
SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Avaliação de impactos cumulativos. Oficina de textos, 2023.
SANTOS, L. S.; ALMEIDA, M. R. R.; VERONEZ, F. A. Participação na Avaliação de Impactos Ambientais no estado de Minas Gerais: um levantamento sobre as audiências públicas. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, v. 15, n. 03, p. 1196-1212, 2022. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v15.3.p1196-1212
VERONEZ, F.; MONTAÑO, M. Análise da qualidade dos estudos de impacto ambiental no estado do Espírito Santo (2007-2013). Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 43, p. 6-21, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v43i0.54180
WEGNER, A.; MOORE, S. A.; BAILEY, J. Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 25, n. 2, p. 143-162, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.003
ZHOURI, A.; OLIVEIRA, R. Development and environmental conflicts in Brazil: challenges for anthropology and anthropologists. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, v. 9, p. 181-208, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-43412012000100007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Rita Raimundo Almeida, Fernanda Aparecida Veronez, Anne Caroline Malvestio