As éticas centradas no sofrimento e suas implicações para o questionamento do uso de animais

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/REPRIM-v10n19a2025-76538

Palavras-chave:

Antropocentrismo, Éticas Centradas no Sofrimento, Especismo, Bem-estar Animal, Sofrimento

Resumo

ROZAS, Mat; RODEZNO, Ángeles Cancino; HORTA, Oscar. Las éticas centradas em el sufrimento y sus implicaciones para el cuestionamiento del uso de los animales. Revista de Filosofia, Maracaibo, v. 38, n. 99, p. 81-97, 2021. 

Esse artigo foi originalmente publicado como “Las éticas centradas en el sufrimiento y sus implicaciones para el cuestionamiento del uso de los animales”, em Revista de Filosofía, v. 38, n. 99, p. 81-97, 2021. Disponível em: https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/filosofia/article/view/37034, sob a licença Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Nesta tradução para o português, as referências bibliográficas foram atualizadas pelos autores.

 

Data de registro: 04/01/2025

Data de aceite: 14/05/2025

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Gustavo Henrique de Freitas Coelho, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)

    Doutorando em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU). E-mail: gusege@hotmail.com. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5265638620788673. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-851X. 

  • Mat Rozas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC)

    Doctorando en la Facultad de Filosofía de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

  • Ángeles Cancino Rodezno, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

    Profesora en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  • Oscar Horta, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC)

    Profesor en la Facultad de Filosofía de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Referências

ADAMS, Carol. Caring about suffering: a feminist exploration. In: DONOVAN, Josephine; ADAMS, Carol J. (Ee.). Beyond animal rights: a feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. New York: Continuum, 1996. p. 170-196.

ARRHENIUS, Gustaf; BYKVIST, Krister. Future generations and interpersonal compensations: moral aspects of energy use. Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy, Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 1995.

BAUMANN, Tobias. Avoiding the worst: how to prevent a moral catastrophe. London: Center for Reducing Suffering, 2022.

BAUMEISTER, Roy F. et al. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, v. 5, n. 4, p. 323-370, 2001.

BENATAR, David. Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

BERNSTEIN, Mark H. On moral considerability: An essay on who morally matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

BERNSTEIN, Mark H. The moral equality of humans and animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

BRIONES MARRERO, Amanda. Una defensa de las axiologías centradas en el sufrimiento. Agora: Papeles de Filosofía, Coruña, v. 41, n. 1, p. 13-25, 2022.

BROOM, Donald M. Sentience and animal welfare. Wallingford: CABI, 2014.

CARRUTHERS, Peter. The animal issue: moral theory in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

CHAO, Roger. Negative average preference utilitarianism. Journal of Philosophy of Life, v. 2, n. 1, p. 55-66, 2012.

CLARK, Stephen R. L. The moral status of animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

CRISP, Roger. Equality, priority, and compassion. Ethics, Chicago, v. 113, n. 4, p. 745-763, 2003.

CRISP, Roger. (2017 [2001]). Well-Being. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archivES/FALL2017/Entries/well-being.

CUNHA, Luciano Carlos. Uma breve introdução à ética animal: desde as questões clássicas até o que vem sendo discutido atualmente. Curitiba: Appris, 2021.

CURTIS, Stanley E. The case for intensive farming of food animals. In: MICKLEY, Linda D.; FOX, Michael W. (Ee.). Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87. Washington: The Humane Society of the United States, 1897. p. 245-255.

DOLAN, Kevin. Ethics, animals and science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999.

DONOVAN, Josephine; ADAMS, Carol J. (Ee.). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics: a reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.

DORADO, Daniel. La consideración moral de los animales no humanos en los últimos cuarenta años: una bibliografía anotada. Télos, Coruña, v. 17, n. 1, p. 47-63, 2010.

DUNAYER, Joan. Speciesism. Derwood: Ryce, 2004.

ÉTICA Animal. Introdução ao sofrimento dos animais. Oakland: Ética Animal, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.animal-ethics.org/introducao-sofrimento-animais-selvagens.

FARIA, Catia. Equality, priority and nonhuman animals. Dilemata, Barcelona, n. 14, p. 225-236, 2014.

FEHIGE, Christoph. A pareto principle for possible people. In: FEHIGE, Christoph; WESSELS, Ulla (Ee.). Preferences. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1998, p. 508-543.

FISHCOUNT. Numbers of farmed fish slaughtered each year. 2019a. Disponível em: http://fishcount.org.uk/fish-count-estimates-2/NUMBERS-of-farmed-fish-slaughtered-each-year.

FISHCOUNT. Numbers of fish caught from the wild each year. 2019b. Disponível em: http://fishcount.org.uk/fish-count-estimates-2/NUMBERS-of-fish-caught-from-the-wild-each-year.

FLETCHER, Guy. The philosophy of well-being: an introduction. London: Routledge, 2016.

FRANCIONE, Gary. Animals, property and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995.

FRANCIONE, Gary. Rain without thunder: the ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996.

FRANKLIN, Julian H. Animal rights and moral philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.

FRASER, David. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2008.

FREY, Raymond Gillespie. Interests and rights: the case against animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

GLOOR, Lukas. The case for suffering-focused ethics. Center on Long-Term Risk. 2019. Disponível em: https://longtermrisk.org/the-case-for-suffering-focused-ethics/.

HAYNES, Richard P. Animal welfare: competing conceptions and their ethical implications. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.

HOLTUG, Nils. Welfarism: The very idea. Utilitas, Compenhagen, v. 15, n. 2, p. 151-174, 2003.

HOLTUG, Nils. Equality for animals. In: RYBERG, Jesper; PETERSEN, Thomas S.; WOLF, Clark (Ee.). New waves in applied ethics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007. p. 1-24.

HORTA, Oscar; ALBERSMEIER, Frauke. Defining speciesism. Philosophy Compass, vol. 15, issue 11, p. 1-9, 2020.

HORTA, Oscar Egalitarianism and animals. Between the Species, San Luis Obispo, v. 19, n. 1, p. 108-144, 2016.

HORTA, Oscar. O que é o especismo? Trad. Gustavo Henrique de Freitas Coelho e Arthur Falco de Lima. Ethic@, Santa Catarina, v. 21, n. 1, p. 162-193, 2022a.

HORTA, Oscar. Making a stand for animals. Oxford: Routledge, 2022b.

HUI, Katrina. Moral anthropocentrism is unavoidable. American Journal of Bioethics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 25, 2014.

HURKA, Thomas. Asymmetries in value. Noûs, v. 44, n. 2, p. 199-223, 2010.

HURSTHOUSE, Rosalind. Ethics, humans and other animals. London: Routledge, 2000.

KELLER, Simon. Welfarism. Philosophy Compass, v. 4, n. 1, p. 82-95, 2009.

KORSGAARD, Christine M. Fellow creatures: our obligations to the other animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

LEAHY, Michael P. T. Against liberation: putting animals in perspective. London: Routledge, 1991.

LEIGHTON, Jonathan. The battle for compassion: ethics in an apathetic universe. New York: Algora, 2011.

LYNCH, Tony; WELLS, David. Non-anthropocentrism? a killing objection. Environmental Values, v. 7, n. 2, p. 151-163, 1998.

MATHENY, Gaverick. Utilitarianism and Animals. In: SINGER, Peter (Ed.). In defense of animals: the second wave. Malden: Blackwell, 2006. p. 13-25.

MATHISON, Eric. Asymmetries and ill-being. 2018. 107 f. Thesis (Doctorade in Philosophy) – Department of Philosophy at University of Toronto, Toronto. 2018.

MAYERFELD, Jamie. The moral asymmetry of happiness and suffering. Southern Journal of Philosophy, Memphis, v. 34, p. 317-338, 1996.

MAYERFELD, Jamie. Suffering and moral responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

MIDGLEY, Mary. Animals and why they matter. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1993.

NARVESON, Jan. Animal rights. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Guelph, v. 7, n. 1, p. 161-178, 1977.

NG, Yew-Kwang. Towards welfare biology: evolutionary economics of animal consciousness and suffering. Biology and Philosophy, Barcelona, v. 10, p. 255-285, 1995.

NOBIS, Nathan. Vegetarianism and virtue: does consequentialism demand too little? Social Theory and Practice, v. 28, n. 1, p. 135-156, 2002.

NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA LA ALIMENTACIÓN Y LA AGRICULTURA – FAO (2024). Ganadería primaria. FAOSTAT – Datos sobre alimentación y agricultura. Disponível em: http://fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QL.

PETRINOVICH, Lewis F. Darwinian dominion: animal welfare and human interests. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

PLUHAR, Evelyn B. Beyond prejudice: the moral significance of human and nonhuman animals. Durham: Duke University Press, 1995.

REARDON, Mark. Animal ethics: animal welfare or animal ‘illfare’? Ethical Perspectives, v. 18, n. 2, p. 269-285, 2011.

REGAN, Tom. The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.

ROWE, Aabraham. The scale of direct human impact on invertebrates. OSF Preprints, p. 1-13, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/psvk2.

ROWLANDS, Mark. Animal rights: moral theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

ROZAS, Mat. Two asymmetries in population and general normative ethics. Etikk i praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, Trondheim, v. 15, n. 1, p. 41-49, 2021.

ROZAS, Mat. Una tipología de las éticas asimétricas. Contrastes: revista internacional de filosofía, Málaga, v. 27, n. 1, p. 29-40, 2022.

ROZIN, Paul; Royzman, Eedward B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, v. 5, n. 4, p. 296-320, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.

RYDER, Richard D. Painism defended. Think, v. 14, n. 41, p. 47-55, 2015.

SAPONTZIS, Steve F. Morals, reason, and animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.

SINGER, Peter. Utilitarianism and vegetarianism. Philosophy & Public Affairs, v. 9, n. 4, p. 325-337, 1980.

SINGER, Peter. Animal Liberation now. NewYork: Random House, 2023.

SZTYBEL, David. The rights of animal persons. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-37, 2006.

ALDAVE, Mikel Torres. Capacidades y derechos de los animales: argumentos a favor de la teoría de M.C. Nussbaum. Dilemata, Madrid, n. 1, p. 33-47, 2009.

TRANÖY, Knut Erik. Asymmetries in ethics: On the structure of a general theory of ethics. Inquiry, v. 10, n. 1, p. 351-372, 1967.

VANDEVEER, Donald. On beasts, persons and the original position. The Monist, v. 62, n. 3, p. 368-377, 1979.

VELASCO SESMA, Angélica. La ética animal: ¿una cuestión feminista? Madrid: Cátedra, 2017.

VINDING, Magnus. Suffering-focused ethics: defense and implications. Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica, 2020.

WALDHORN, Daniela R.; AUTRIC, Elisa.Shrimp: The animals most commonly used and killed for food production. Rethink Priorities. Disponível em: https://rethinkpriorities.org/publications/shrimp-the-animals-most-commonly-usedand-killed-for-food-production.

WALKER, Anthony D. M. Negative utilitarianism. Mind, v. 83, n. 331, p. 424-28, 1974.

WILLIAMS, Bernard. The human prejudice. In: WILLIAMS, Bernard. Philosophy as a humanistic discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. p. 135-152.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-11-24

Edição

v. 10 n. 19 jan./jun. 2025

Seção

Traduções

Licença

Copyright (c) 2025 Gustavo Henrique de Freitas Coelho; Mat Rozas, Ángeles Cancino Rodezno, Oscar Horta

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Como Citar

COELHO, Gustavo Henrique de Freitas; ROZAS, Mat; RODEZNO, Ángeles Cancino; HORTA, Oscar. As éticas centradas no sofrimento e suas implicações para o questionamento do uso de animais. REVISTA PRIMORDIUM, Uberlândia, v. 10, n. 19, p. 103–126, 2025. DOI: 10.14393/REPRIM-v10n19a2025-76538. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/primordium/article/view/76538. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2025.