Abstract
This article analyzes the Ecosystem Services provided in the Arroio Passo Fundo watershed, located in Guaíba City/RS. To analyze the transitions that occurred in land use and land cover classes between 1985 and 2019, MapBiomas Collection 5 Project data were used, as well as the transformations that occurred in this interval of 34 years, which supported the elaboration trend scenario for 2030 and 2050, through the free software Dinamica EGO. The results show that watershed provided around US$ 21,020,441 in Ecosystem Services in 1985, decreasing to US$ 19,635,767 in 2019, and an estimated value of US $ 19,059,616 in the 2050 trend scenario. The most evident change was the conversion of grassland to soybean cultivation. The identification of land use and land cover classification associated with multiple Ecosystem Services is an effective alternative for public managers and decision makers to develop proactive and efficient strategies for improving the environmental quality in the watershed.
References
BACHI, L. et al. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) in landscapes with a tourist vocation: Mapping and modeling the physical landscape components that bring benefits to people in a mountain tourist destination in southeastern Brazil. Tourism Management, [s. l.], v. 77, n. May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104017
BAGSTAD, K. J.; SEMMENS, D. J.; WINTHROP, R. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], v. 5, p. 40–50, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007
CABRAL, P. et al. Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: A first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France. Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.005
COSTANZA, R. Nature: ecosystems without commodifying them. Nature, [s. l.], v. 443, n. 7113, p. 749, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/443749b
COSTANZA, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 1, p. 3–15, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
COSTANZA, R. et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], v. 28, p. 1–16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
COSTANZA, R., D'ARGE, R., DE GROOT, R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260.1997. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
DAILY, G. C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Preed. Washington D.C.: [s. n.], 1997.
DE LIMA, A. D. S. et al. Ecosystem-based information as a support tool to the integrated coastal management of the Santa Catarina Island, Brazil. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, [s. l.], v. 44, p. 20–35, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v44i0.54947
DINAMICA EGO. Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto / Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brasil. 2020. Disponível em: https://csr.ufmg.br/dinamica/. Acesso em: 01 set 2020.
DRH/SEMA. Departamento de Recursos Hídricos da Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente do Rio Grande do Sul. Plano da Bacia Hidrográfica do Lago Guaíba. Relatório Final Síntese e SIG - Revisão 01. 2016. Disponível em: http://comitedolagoguaiba.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Relat%C3%B3rio_Final_Sintese_Rev01_completo-comp.pdf. Acesso em: 01 fev 2019.
GUERRA, T. et al. Diagnóstico Ambiental da bacia hidrográfica do arroio Passo Fundo, município de Guaíba, RS. Porto Alegre, p. 111, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.ecologia.ufrgs.br/lagoguaiba/eventos/MostraTrabalhos/trabalhos/21-arroio%20%20passo%20fundo.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.
HERNÁNDEZ-BLANCO, M. et al. Future scenarios for the value of ecosystem services in Latin America and the Caribbean to 2050. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 2, p. 100008, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100008
INFLATION TOOL. Value of 1984 US Dollars today. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.inflationtool.com/us-dollar/1984-to-present-value?amount=1. Acesso em: 01 dez 2020.
KUBISZEWSKI, I. et al. The future value of ecosystem services: Global scenarios and national implications. Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], v. 26, p. 289–301, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.004
LEITÃO, L. C. R.; SANTOS, J. G. dos; ARAGÃO, M. A. de S. Mapeamento e Avaliação de Serviços dos Ecossistemas do sitio de Importância Comunitária “Dunas De Mira, Gândara e Gafanhas”. IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Geomática - II Jornadas Lusófonas - Ciências e tecnologias de Informação Geográfica. Presidente Prudente-SP: [s. n.], 2017. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.1111928036
MAES, J. et al. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. [S. l.: s. n.], 2013. https://doi.org/10.2779/12398
MAES, J. et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 31–39, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
MARTINEZ-HARMS, M. J. et al. Scenarios for land use and ecosystem services under global change. Ecosystem Services, [s. l.], v. 25, p. 56–68, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.021
MEA. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: [s. n.], 2005. Disponível em: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.aspx . Acesso em: 02 mar. 2020.
PROJETO MAPBIOMAS – Coleção 5 (1985-2019) da Série Anual de Mapas de Cobertura e Uso de Solo do Brasil. 2020. Disponível em: <https://plataforma.mapbiomas.org/map#coverage>. Acesso em: 01 set 2020.
RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Atlas Socioeconômico Rio Grande do Sul. Secretaria de Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Departamento de Planejamento Governamental. 4 ed. Porto Alegre: Secretaria de Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, 2019. 125 p. Disponível em: https://atlassocioeconomico.rs.gov.br/inicial Acesso em 15 jan 2021.
ROCHA, J. (2012). Sistemas complexos, modelação e geosimulação da evolução de padrões de uso e ocupação do solo. Tese de doutorado, Geografia (Ciências da Informação Geográfica), Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território, 2012. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/6772 . Acesso em: 20 jan 2021.
RODRIGUES, H. O.; SOARES-FILHO, B. S.; COSTA, W. L. de S. Dinamica EGO, uma plataforma para modelagem de sistemas ambientais. Anais XIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Florianópolis, Brasil, 21-26 abril 2007, INPE, p. 3089-3096. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228624479_Dinamica_EGO_uma_plataforma_para_modelagem_de_sistemas_ambientais Acesso em: 22 nov. 2020.
SOARES-FILHO, B. S.; ARAÚJO, A. A.; CERQUEIRA, G. C. DINAMICA – Um software para simulação de dinâmica de paisagens. II Workshop Tratamento de imagens, [s. l.], p. 3, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.dpi.inpe.br/cursos/tutoriais/modelagem/software_demos/Dinamica/soares.pdf Acesso em: 22
nov. 2020.
SOARES-FILHO, B. S.; RODRIGUES, H. O.; COSTA, W. L. Modeling environmental dynamics with Dinamica EGO. Instituto de Geociências - Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto, [s. l.], n. October, p. 114, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tao_Guo28/publication/282782423_Dinamica_EGO_guidebookpdf/links/561c711108aea80367243fdc.pdf Acesso em: 14 jul. 2020.
WOLDEYOHANNES, A.; COTTER, M.; BIRU, W.D.; KELBORO, G. Assessing Changes in Ecosystem Service Values over 1985–2050 in Response to Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics in Abaya-Chamo Basin, Southern Ethiopia. Land, [s. l.], v. 9, p. 37, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020037
Authors hold the Copyright for articles published in this journal, and the journal holds the right for first publication. Because they appear in a public access journal, articles are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.