Luis Radford - Questões em torno da Teoria da Objetivação
Main Article Content
Abstract
This interview held in November 2017 with Professor Dr. Luis Radford, Full Professor in Laurentian University in Ontario, Canada, is divided into three sections. The first section deals with the researcher's understanding of some concepts — such as knowledge, knowing, learning, objectification, subjectivation, activity, and culture — that constitute an interconnected theoretical web at the center of the cultural theory of objectification. In the second section the researcher presents his analysis of the construct of “theoretical concept” as proposed by Davydov, and contrasts Davydov’s construct with his own understanding of concept, which he presents as a subjective and objective, material and ideal, entity that is expressed in the practical and concrete activity of the individuals. In the last section, considering the Cultural Theory of Objectification as a historical-cultural theory of teaching and learning, Professor Luis Radford answers questions about the articulation between scientific concept and school content bringing examples related to mathematics teaching. The coherence and theoretical basis of the researcher, who considers cultural practices as historically constituted ways of thinking about, and acting in, the world, are revealed in the course of the interview bringing contributions to the organization of teaching practice in the field of Mathematics Education in a specific way and the field of Education in general.
Downloads
Article Details
References
D’AMORE, B.; RADFORD, L. Enseñanza y aprendizaje de las matemáticas: problemas semióticos, epistemológicos y prácticos. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, 2017.
DAVYDOV, V. Tipos de generalizacion en la ensenanza. Havana: Pueblo y Educacion, 1982.
______. La ensenanza escolar y el desarrollo psíquico. Moscou: Progreso, 1988.
RADFORD, L. The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), p. 2-7, 2010.
______. Cognição matemática: história, antropologia e epistemologia. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2012.
______. Three key concepts of the theory of objectifcation: knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, v. 2, n. 1, p. 7-44, 2013.
______. The progressive development of early embodied algebraic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 257-277, 2014a.
______.Cultura e historia: dos conceptos dificiles y controversiales en aproximaciones contemporaneas en la educación matemática. In: MENDES, Iran; FARIAS, Carlos Aldemir (Orgs.). Práticas socioculturais e educação matemática. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2014b. p. 49-68.
______. De la teoría de la objetivación. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, v. 7, n. 2, p.132-150, 2014c.
______. A Teoria da Objetivação e seu lugar na pesquisa sociocultural em Educação Matemática. In: MORETTI, Vanessa D.; Cedro, Wellington L. (Org.). Educação Matemática e a Teoria Histórico-Cultural: um Olhar sobre as Pesquisas. 1.ed. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2017, p. 229-261.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. Pensamento e Linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
______. A construção do pensamento e da linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. 2009.
Vídeos em Português
MOURA, Manoel Oriosvaldo de. Entrevista com Luis Radford sobre a Teoria da Objetivação.Labeduc. Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.labeduc.fe.usp.br/?videos=entrevista-com-o-prof-dr-luis-radford-laurentian-university-canada.
NORONHA, C., Barbosa, T. (2017). Teoria da Objetivação.Conversa com Professor Luis Radford Grupo de Pesquisa CONTAR da UFRN, Natal, Brasil.Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqFSZzVoXw4.