Tipologia das forma de produsage

por um plano conceitual e metodológico para a Análise do Discurso Digital

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/HTP-v4nEspecial-2022-67201

Palavras-chave:

Participação online, Formas de envolvimento, Discursos digitais, Ferramentas de análise

Resumo

O objetivo deste artigo é renovar algumas ferramentas de análise conceituais e metodológicas para a realização de pesquisas em análise do discurso digital. Para atingir este objetivo, o estudo adota uma perspectiva pluridisciplinar, recorrendo aos campos da comunicação digital e análise do discurso, análise da participação online e sociologia dos usos. A metodologia adapta uma "abordagem tecno-pragmática" baseada no método de observação etnográfica online. Os campos de investigação correspondem a vários tipos de espaços assíncronos de discussão online: fóruns de discussão, plataformas de perguntas e respostas, Facebook, etc. As conclusões sintéticas da revisão bibliográfica e as observações persistentes dos campos de investigação levaram à elaboração de uma tipologia sintética dos tipos de participação online, que apresenta uma grade de análise a dois níveis, conceitual e metodológico. Após a exposição desta grade de análise, uma aplicação da mesma a um pequeno corpus de estudos do espaço de discussão comunitário “Reddit” será realizada a fim de traduzir as contribuições das ferramentas de análise desenvolvidas através desta grade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Manar Alomran, Université de Technologie de Troyes

Doctorante en sciences de l’information et de la communication, laboratoire LIST3N, équipe Tech-CICO.

Referências

ABBATE, Janet. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge (MA) : The MIT Press, 1999.

ANTIN, Judd ; CHESHIRE, Coye. Readers are Not Free-Riders: Reading as a Form of Participation on Wikipedia. CSCW’10 : Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative Work, February 2010, p. 127-130. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718942

AUDRAN, Jaques ; GARCIN Claudine. Apprendre en ligne, une question de participation?. Recherche et formation, n. 68, p. 63-78, 2011. En ligne sur : <https://journals.openedition.org/rechercheformation/1534>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rechercheformation.1534

BARATS, Christine. Manuel d'analyse du web-2e éd.: En Sciences Humaines et Sociales. Paris : Armand Colin, 2016, p. 5-9.

BEAUDOUIN, Valérie; PASQUIER, Dominique, Forms of contribution and contributors profiles : An automated textual analysis of amateur on line film critics. New Media & Society, v. 19, n. 11, p. 1810-1828, April 2016. En ligne sur : <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444816643504>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816643504

BOUCHARDON, Serge. Des figures de manipulation dans la création numérique. Protée 39, p. 37-46, 2011. En ligne sur : <https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/pr/2011-v39-n1-pr5004899/1006725ar/>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1006725ar

BOUCHARDON, Serge et al., Explorer les possibles de l’écriture multimédia. Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication, p. 11-24, 2011. En ligne sur : <https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-enjeux-de-l-information-et-de-la-communication-2011-2-page-11.htm?ref=doi>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3917/enic.hs03.0002

BRUNS, Axel. Produsage: A Working Definition. Produsage. org. From Production to Produsage : Research into User-Led Content Creation, 2007. En linge sur : <http://produsage.org/produsage>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254975

BRUNS, Axel. Blog, Wikipédia, second Life, and Beyond : From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.

CARDON, Dominique. Culture numérique. Paris : Presses de Sciences Po, 2019. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.cardo.2019.01

CARPENTIER, Nico. Différencier accès, interaction et participation, In : MORELLI, P. ; PIGNARD-CHEYNEL, N. ; BALTAZART, D. (dirs.). Publics et TIC. Confrontations conceptuelles et recherches empiriques. Nancy : PUN-Éditions universitaires de Lorraine, janvier 2016, p. 45-69.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Façon de parler. Paris : Les éditions de Minuit, 1987.

GOODWIN, Charles; GOODWIN, Majorie Harness. Participation, In : DURANTI, A. Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell : Publishing Ltd, 2004, p. 222-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch10

HAMARI, Juho. Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in human behavior, n. 71, p. 469-478, June 2017. En ligne sur : <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563215002265?via%3Dihub>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.036

HINE. Christine. L’ethnographie des communautés en ligne et des médias sociaux : modalités, diversité, potentialités. In : MILLETTE, M. et al. Méthodes de recherche en contexte numérique. Une orientation qualitative. Montréal : Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2020, p. 77-101.

HRASTINSKI, Stefan. A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, v. LII, n. 1, p. 78-82, January 2009. En ligne sur : <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131508000997?via%3Dihub>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009

JALDEMARK, Jimmy; LINDBERG, Ola; OLOFSSON, Anders. Sharing the distance or a distance shared: Social and individual aspects of participation in ICT-supported distance-based teacher education. In: CHAIB, M. ; SVENSSON, A.-K. (eds.). ICT in teacher education : Challenging prospects. Jönköping : Jönköping University Press, 2006, p. 142–160

LATOUR, Bruno. Changer de société. Refaire de la sociologie. Trad. N. Guilhot. Paris : La Découverte, 2006. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.latour.2007.01

LATZK-TOTH, Guillaume ; PROULX, Serge. Enjeux éthiques de la recherche sur le web. In : BARATS, C. (dir.). Manuel d’analyse du Web. Paris : Armand Colin, 2016, p. 38-54.

LAVE, Jean; WENGER, Etienne. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge UK : Cambridge University Press, 1991. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

LICOPPE, Christian ; PROULX, Serge ; GUDICIO, Renato. L’émergence d’un nouveau genre communicationnel dans les organisations fortement connectées : les « questions rapides » par messagerie instantanée. Études de communication, n. 34, p. 93-108, 2010. En ligne sur : <https://journals.openedition.org/edc/1661>. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/edc.1661

LIENARD, Fabien ; ZLITNI, Sami. La communication électronique : enjeux, stratégies, opportunités. Limoges : Lambert-Lucas, éds. 2015, p. 7-19.

MARCOCCIA, Michel. Analyser la communication numérique écrite, Paris : Armand Colin, 2016. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.marco.2016.01

MELUCCI, Alberto. Nomads of the Present. Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society, Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 1989.

PAVEAU, Marie-Anne. L’analyse du discours numérique : dictionnaire des formes et des pratiques. Paris : Hermann, 2017.

PAVEAU Marie-Anne. Technographismes en ligne. Énonciation matérielle visuelle et iconisation du texte. Corela. Cognition, représentation, langage, (HS-28), 2019. En ligne sur : <https://journals.openedition.org/corela/9185>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.9185

PITT, Caroline et al. Connected learning, collapsed contexts: Examining teens’ sociotechnical ecosystems through the lens of digital badges. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, May 2021, p. 1-14. En ligne sur : <https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445635>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445635

PREECE, Jenny; NONNECKE, Blair; ANDREWS, Dorine. The top five reasons for lurking : improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 2, n. 20, p. 201-223, March 2004. En ligne sur : <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563203000876?via%3Dihub>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015

PROULX, Serge ; GRACIA, José Luis ; HEATON, Lorna. La contribution en ligne. Pratiques participatives à l’ère du capitalisme informationnel. Québec : Presse de l’Université du Québec, dir. 2014, p. 2-12.

PROULX, Serge. La participation numérique : une injonction paradoxale. Paris : Presses des Mines, 2020.

SIMONDON, Gilbert. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris : Aubier, 1989.

WEBSTER, Jane; HACKLEY, Peter. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, v. 6, n. 40, p. 1282–1309, 1997. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5465/257034

WENGER, Etienne. Communities of practice : Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1998. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

ZASK, Joëlle. L’art participatif et sa portée critique. In : AIRAUD, S. (dir.). Participa(c)tion. Vitry-sur-Seine : Musé d’art contemporain du Val-de-Marne, 2014, p. 11-17.

ZITTRAIN, Jonathan. The future of the Internet – And How to Stop it. New Haven : Yale University Press, 2008.

Publicado

2022-10-07

Como Citar

ALOMRAN, M. Tipologia das forma de produsage: por um plano conceitual e metodológico para a Análise do Discurso Digital. Revista Heterotópica, [S. l.], v. 4, n. Especial, p. 9–35, 2022. DOI: 10.14393/HTP-v4nEspecial-2022-67201. Disponível em: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/RevistaHeterotopica/article/view/67201. Acesso em: 7 dez. 2022.