PEDESTRIAN URBAN ACCESSIBILITY FOR THE ELDERLY TO BUS PUBLIC TRANSPORT BOARDING POINTS IN BELO HORIZONTE, MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/BGJ-v16n2-a2025-78568Keywords:
Urban accessibility, Public transport, Population aging, Spatial inequality, Pedestrian mobility.Abstract
This study investigates pedestrian urban accessibility for the elderly population to bus public transport boarding points in the municipality of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The research is framed within the context of accelerated population aging and urban development marked by socio-spatial inequalities, which present significant challenges to equitable urban mobility. The main objective was to develop a synthetic indicator — the Elderly Accessibility Index to Boarding Points (IApe) — capable of measuring pedestrian accessibility for individuals aged 60 and over, considering variables such as walking time, terrain slope, and the spatial distribution of the elderly population. The methodology employed data from the National Register of Addresses for Statistical Purposes (CNEFE/IBGE), static GTFS data on public transport boarding points, and the road network from Open Street Map. Travel time estimation was performed using the R5R computational package, which simulates walking speeds adjusted for slope, assuming an average speed of 2.7 km/h for elderly individuals. Spatial analyses were conducted using H3 hexagons (0.11 km²) and integrated techniques of regression, interpolation, and statistical normalization. The results indicate that, although most areas in the municipality present satisfactory levels of accessibility, low accessibility levels persist in peripheral regions and high-slope areas, particularly those with lower income. It is concluded that the IApe is a robust and innovative tool for informing public policies aimed at inclusive urban mobility, contributing to the development of just cities capable of accommodating the demands of an aging population.
References
AXHAUSEN, K. W.; SCHÖNFELDER, S. Measuring accessibility: a review of concepts and methods. Londres: Routledge, 2003.
BEN-AKIVA, M.; LERMAN, S. R. Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.
BOHANNON, R. W. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and Ageing, Londres, v. 26, n. 1, p. 15-19, 1997.
BOHANNON, R. W.; ANDREWS, A. W. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, [S.l.], v. 97, n. 3, p. 182-189, 2011.
CARDOSO, L. Transporte público, acessibilidade urbana e desigualdades socio-espaciais na Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte. Tese (Doutorado) — Univer-sidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2007.
CERVERO, R. The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1998.
CURRIE, G. Transport for social inclusion: challenges and opportunities. Melbourne: Monash University, 2010.
DAVIDSON, M. Social exclusion and transport policy. Londres: Policy Press, 1995.
DUIM, E.; LEBRÃO, M. L.; ANTUNES, J. L. F. Walking speed of older people and pedestrian crossing time. Journal of Transport & Health, [S.l.], v. 5, p. 70-76, 2017.
GEURS, K. T.; VAN WEE, B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 127-140, 2004.
GLAESER, E. L. Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Nova York: Penguin Press, 2011.
HANSEN, W. G. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 73-76, 1959.
LEVINE, J. et al. Does accessibility require density or speed? Journal of the American Planning Association, [S.l.], v. 78, n. 2, p. 157-172, 2012.
MINETTI, A. E. et al. Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. Journal of Applied Physiology, [S.l.], 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01177.2001.
PEREIRA, R. H. M. et al. Distribuição espacial de características sociodemográficas e locali-zação de empregos e serviços públicos das 20 maiores cidades do Brasil. Texto para Dis-cussão, n. 2772. Brasília: Ipea, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/td2772.
PEREIRA, R. H. M.; SARAIVA, M.; HERSZENHUT, D.; BRAGA, C. K. V.; CONWAY, M. W. R5R: Rapid Realistic Routing on Multimodal Transport Networks with R5 in R. Transport Findings, [S.l.], n. 21262, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.21262.
STUDENSKI, S. et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA, [S.l.], v. 305, n. 1, p. 50-58, 2011.
TORKU, A.; CHAN, A. P. C.; YUNG, E. H. K. Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions. Ageing and Society, [S.l.], p. 1-38, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000239.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giovanni Candido Miranda, Antonio Henrique Noronha Ribeiro , Carlos Lobo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All copyrights are reserved to authors. Reproductions of any part of this journal, including the non-commercial use of figures, maps and other illustrations, are allowed provided that the original source of publication be assigned.
