Streaming platforms and the right to access Culture

understandings and limits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-51.2.2023.70555.117-149

Keywords:

Access to Culture, Public Policies, Streaming Platforms

Abstract

The research addressed the possibilities of using streaming platforms as tools for expanding and implementing the constitutional right of access to culture. The deductive method was employed, with a vertical temporal scope, falling within the field of applied social sciences. A historical-conceptual analysis of the term "Culture" was necessary, as well as a study of streaming platforms, aiming for a formulation capable of distinguishing these platforms from other services. By combining the two previous points, an examination of the main components of public policies was conducted, along with a brief analysis of three of these policies. This entire development generated a pertinent diagnosis to the research's motivating question.

Author Biographies

  • Pedro Lucas Comarella Schatzmann, Faculdade de Direito de Franca

    Estudante de Direito na Faculdade de Direito de Franca, no município de Franca, São Paulo. Intercambista na Universidade de Coimbra. Pesquisas voltadas para o campo de políticas públicas e direitos culturais.

  • Ana Paula Bagaiolo Moraes, Faculdade de Direito de Franca

    Doctor in Political and Economic Law from Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (2018), Master's degree in International Law from Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (2011), currently pursuing a Master's degree in Regional Development at UNI-FACEF (2020), Specialist from Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado in Agrobusiness Law (2010), and Graduate from Faculdade de Direito de Franca (2008). Currently, she is a professor and works in the areas of Civil Law (with an emphasis on General Part, Obligations, Family, and Successions) and Agrobusiness Law.

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Streaming platforms and the right to access Culture: understandings and limits. (2025). Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 51(2), 117-149. https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-51.2.2023.70555.117-149