The Stabilization of the Provisional Tutelage and the Recent Interpretations Given by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice
1.760.966-SP and 1.797.365-RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-50.1.2022.53028.629-666Keywords:
Civil procedure, Provisional tutelage, Stabilization, UrgencyAbstract
The present research seeks to analyze the “provisional tutelage”, also known as “interim measures”, and its modalities as instruments of the civil procedure, with its constitutional function. Also, it has the central objective to analyze of the procedure of stabilization of the provisional tutelage and how to avoid stabilization, withstanding the constitutional principles. Bibliographical references were raised on the subject. The provisional tutelage and its species, as well as the injunction, the incidental moment and antecedent moment of the tutelage, and the hypothesis and procedure for the stabilization were conceptualized as well, and the procedure for the stabilization is studied according to the definition of article 304 of the Civil Procedure Code and the interpretations given by the competent superior court so far. As a result of the study, there are shown many divergences of understanding about the procedure among the Third Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice while judging the appeal named as “recurso especial” nº 1.760.966-SP and by the First Chamber while judging the “recurso especial” nº 1.797.365-RS. Therefore, the most literal interpretation of the article is defended, in respect of the constitutional aspect of the civil procedure and the will of the legislator.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.