A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-63637

Keywords:

Broadleaf, Coniferous, Monoculture, Regeneration, Rhizosphere.

Abstract

Monoculture for timber production has been replacing natural environments as the demand for renewable energy sources increases. The lack of nutrient compensation may increase the risk of soil depletion, thus changing soil properties. To summarize the impact of forestry activities in edaphic environments, we present a meta-analysis on the rhizosphere effects of coniferous and broadleaved trees established as monoculture and natural regeneration on soil physicochemical properties. Records of soil attributes published in peer-reviewed journals from eight countries were collected. Clay content changed only in monoculture sites, decreasing 55.51% in the rhizosphere, while silt and sand presented significant variations in both monoculture and naturally regenerated areas. Conifers affected the soil more than broadleaved trees, evidenced by higher pH reduction (-2.96% vs. -1.98%) and higher increase of Al3+ (197.43% vs. 50.68%), K+ (80.40% vs. 69.90%), CEC (24.61% vs. 17.35%), and total organic carbon (82.21% vs. 69.89%). Also, the rhizosphere affected regeneration soils more than monoculture, indicated by higher Al3+ (50.68% vs. ns) and available P (32.31% vs. ns), K+ (203.44% vs. ns), CEC (34.90% vs. 20.93), and total organic carbon (91.55% vs. 63.23%). These results indicate higher nutrient availability in naturally regenerated than monoculture sites, as higher species diversity and better plant litter quality are expected. This meta-analysis shows that coniferous and naturally regenerated trees had a higher influence on the rhizosphere and soil properties than broadleaved and monocultures. Management practices must be revisited to ensure the long-term sustainability of forestry activity, and studies in tropical zones must be intensified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGNELLI, A., et al. Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) rhizosphere affects limestone-derived soil under a multi-centennial forest. Plant and Soil. 2016, 400, 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2732-x

AKSELSSON, C., et al. Weathering rates in Swedish forest soils. Biogeosciences. 2019, 16, 4429–4450. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4429-2019

ÁLVAREZ, E., et al. Aluminum speciation in the bulk and rhizospheric soil solution of the species colonizing an abandoned copper mine in Galicia (NW Spain). Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2011, 11, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0295-2

ÁLVAREZ, E., et al. Aluminium geochemistry in the bulk and rhizospheric soil of the species colonising an abandoned copper mine in Galicia (NW Spain). Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2010. 10, 1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0245-z

ANGST, G., et al. Spatial distribution and chemical composition of soil organic matter fractions in rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil under European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Geoderma. 2016, 264, 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.10.016

BORTOLUZZI, E.C., et al. Accumulation and Precipitation of Cu and Zn in a Centenarian Vineyard. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2019, 83, 492–502. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.09.0328

BORTOLUZZI, E.C., et al. Mineralogical changes caused by grape production in a regosol from subtropical Brazilian climate. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2012, 12, 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0509-x

BROECKLING, C.D., et al., 2019. Rhizosphere Ecology. In: B. Fath, ed. Encyclopedia of Ecology. United Kingdom: Oliver Walter, pp. 574–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11132-7

BU, W.S., et al. Mixed broadleaved tree species increases soil phosphorus availability but decreases the coniferous tree nutrient concentration in subtropical China. Forests. 2020, 11, 461–477. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040461

CALVARUSO, C., N’DIRA, V. and TURPAULT, M.-P. Impact of common European tree species and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) on the physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil. 2011, 342, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0710-x

CHEN, H. Phosphatase activity and P fractions in soils of an 18-year-old Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantation. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003. 178, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00487-4

CHEN, L., ZHANG, C. and DUAN, W. Temporal variations in phosphorus fractions and phosphatase activities in rhizosphere and bulk soil during the development of Larix olgensis plantations. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2016. 179 (1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201500060

CHEN, X., et al. Greater variations of rhizosphere effects within mycorrhizal group than between mycorrhizal group in a temperate forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018, 126, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.026

CHIELLINI, C., et al. Exploring the links between bacterial communities and magnetic susceptibility in bulk soil and rhizosphere of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Applied Soil Ecology. 2019, 138, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.008

CLOUTIER-HURTEAU, B., SAUVÉ, S. and COURCHESNE, F. Comparing WHAM 6 and MINEQL+ 4.5 for the Chemical Speciation of Cu 2+ in the Rhizosphere of Forest Soils. Environmental Science and Technology. 2007, 41(23), 8104–8110. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0708464

CLOUTIER-HURTEAU, B., et al. The speciation of water-soluble Al and Zn in the rhizosphere of forest soils. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2010, 12, 1274. https://doi.org/10.1039/c002497j

COLLIGNON, C., et al. Time change of aluminium toxicity in the acid bulk soil and the rhizosphere in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. Plant and Soil. 2012, 357, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1154-2

COLLIGNON, C., CALVARUSO, C. and TURPAULT, M.-P. Temporal dynamics of exchangeable K, Ca and Mg in acidic bulk soil and rhizosphere under Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. Plant and Soil. 2011, 349, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0881-0

COURCHESNE, F., KRUYTS, N. and LEGRAND, P. Labile zinc concentration and free copper ion activity in the rhizosphere of forest soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2006. 25(3), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-593R.1

DAI, X., et al. C:N:P stoichiometry of rhizosphere soils differed significantly among overstory trees and understory shrubs in plantations in subtropical China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2018, 48, 1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0095

DAWSON, T.E., HAHM, W.J. and CRUTCHFIELD‐PETERS, K. Digging deeper: what the critical zone perspective adds to the study of plant ecophysiology. New Phytologist. 2020, 226(3), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16410

DE FEUDIS, M., et al. Altitude affects the quality of the water-extractable organic matter (WEOM) from rhizosphere and bulk soil in European beech forests. Geoderma. 2017, 302, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.015

DEL RE, A.C. A Practical Tutorial on Conducting Meta-Analysis in R. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2015, 11, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.11.1.p037

DESSAUX, Y., GRANDCLÉMENT, C. and FAURE, D. Engineering the Rhizosphere. Trends in Plant Science. 2016, 21, 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.002

DORAN, J.W. and PARKIN, T.B., 1994. Defining and Assessing Soil Quality. In: Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Madison: SSSA Special Publication no. 35, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1

DOTANIYA, M.L. and MEENA, V.D. Rhizosphere Effect on Nutrient Availability in Soil and Its Uptake by Plants: A Review. Proceedings of the National. Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 2014, 85, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0297-0

FAN, Z., et al. Changes in plant rhizosphere microbial communities under different vegetation restoration patterns in karst and non-karst ecosystems. Scientific Reports. 2019, 9, 8761–8773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44985-8

FANG, X.M., et al. Soil phosphorus functional fractions and tree tissue nutrient concentrations influenced by stand density in subtropical Chinese fir plantation forests. PLoS One. 2017, 12, e0186905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186905

FIRN, J., ERSKINE, P.D. and LAMB, D. Woody species diversity influences productivity and soil nutrient availability in tropical plantations. Oecologia. 2007, 154, 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0850-8

FUJII, K., AOKI, M. and KITAYAMA, K. Biodegradation of low molecular weight organic acids in rhizosphere soils from a tropical montane rain forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2012, 47, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.018

FURUKAWA, T.A., et al. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006, 59, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006

GUAN, X., WANG, S.L. and ZHANG, W.D. Availability of N and P in the rhizosphere of three subtropical species. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 2016, 28(2), 159–166.

HARTLEY, A.E., et al. Plant Performance and Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in Response to Simulated Climate Change in Subarctic Dwarf Shrub Heath. Oikos, 1999, 86, 331. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546450

HE, Q., et al. Vegetation type rather than climate modulates the variation in soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry in subalpine forests in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Geoderma. 2020, 374, 114424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114424

HIGGINS, J.P.T., et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal. 2003, 327, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

HINSINGER, P. How Do Plant Roots Acquire Mineral Nutrients? Chemical Processes Involved in the Rhizosphere. Advances in Agronomy. 1998, 64, 225–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60506-4

HOFMANN, K., HEUCK, C. and SPOHN, M. Phosphorus resorption by young beech trees and soil phosphatase activity as dependent on phosphorus availability. Oecologia. 2016, 181, 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3581-x

HOU, G., et al. A meta-analysis of changes in soil organic carbon stocks after afforestation with deciduous broadleaved, sempervirent broadleaved, and conifer tree species. Annals of Forest Science. 2020, 77, 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00997-3

HU, X.F., et al. The effects of simulated acid rain on internal nutrient cycling and the ratios of Mg, Al, Ca, N, and P in tea plants of a subtropical plantation. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 2019, 191, 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7248-z

HUMMES, A.P., et al. Transfer of copper and zinc from soil to grapevine-derived products in young and centenarian vineyards. Water, Air & Soil Pollution. 2019, 230, 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4198-6

ISLAM, K. and WEIL, R. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2000, 79, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00145-0

KONSTANTOPOULOS, S., 2006. Fixed and Mixed Effects Models in Meta-Analysis. IZA Discussion Papers Series 2198, 1–39. ISSN: 2365-9793.

KORCHAGIN, J., et al. Evidences of soil geochemistry and mineralogy changes caused by eucalyptus rhizosphere. Catena. 2019, 175, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.001

KOURTEV, P.S., EHRENFELD, J.G. and HAGGBLOM, M. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology. 2002, 83, 3152–3166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3071850

KOUTSOS, T.M., MENEXES, G.C. and DORDAS, C.A. An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences. Science of Total Environment. 2019, 682, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354

KUZYAKOV, Y. and BLAGODATSKAYA, E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015, 83, 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025

LAURI, P., et al. Woody biomass energy potential in 2050. Energy Policy. 2014, 66, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.033

LIU, J., et al. Characteristics of bulk and rhizosphere soil microbial community in an ancient Platycladus orientalis forest. Applied Soil Ecology. 2018, 132, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.014

LIU, R., et al. Differential magnitude of rhizosphere effects on soil aggregation at three stages of subtropical secondary forest successions. Plant and Soil. 2019, 436, 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03935-z

LOVATTO, P.A., et al. Meta-análise em pesquisas científicas: enfoque em metodologias. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2007, 36, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007001000026

LUO, Y., et al. Modeled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and [CO2] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Global Change Biology. 2008, 14, 1986–1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01629.x

LUO, Y., et al. Terrestrial carbon-cycle feedback to climate warming: experimental evidence on plant regulation and impacts of biofuel feedstock harvest. GCB Bioenergy. 2009, 1(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01005.x

MALYSZ, M. and OVERBECK, G.E. Distinct tree regeneration patterns in Araucaria forest and old monoculture tree plantations. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2018, 41, 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-018-0475-7

MCGAHAN, D.G., SOUTHARD, R.J. and ZASOSKI, R.J. Rhizosphere effects on soil solution composition and mineral stability. Geoderma. 2014, 226–227, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.011

PENG, Y., et al. Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale. Forest Ecology and Management. 2020, 478, 118510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118510

PHILLIPS, R.P. and FAHEY, T.J. The influence of soil fertility on rhizosphere effects in northern hardwood forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2008, 72, 453–461. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0389

PHILLIPS, R.P. and YANAI, R.D. The effects of AlCl3 additions on rhizosphere soil and fine root chemistry of sugar maple (Acer saccharum). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2004, 159, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000049187.35869.7d

R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2019. https://www.R-project.org

ROHATGI, A. WebPlotDigitizer: Web based tool to extract data from plots images and maps. Version 4.2. 2019. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer

ROSENSTOCK, N.P., et al. Base cations in the soil bank: non-exchangeable pools may sustain centuries of net loss to forestry and leaching. Soil. 2019, 5(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-351-2019

RUSTAD, L., et al. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia. 2001, 126, 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000544

SARDANS, J., et al. Warming and drought alter C and N concentration, allocation and accumulation in a Mediterranean shrubland. Global Change Biology. 2008, 14, 2304–2316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01656.x

SÉGUIN, V., GAGNON, C. and COURCHESNE, F. Changes in water extractable metals, pH and organic carbon concentrations at the soil-root interface of forested soils. Plant and Soil. 2004, 260, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030170.49493.5f

SOKOLOVA, T.A. Specificity of soil properties in the rhizosphere: analysis of literature data. Eurasian Soil Science. 2015, 48, 968–980. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229315050099

SOKOLOVA, T.A. The role of soil biota in the weathering of minerals: A review of literature. Eurasian Soil Science. 2011, 44, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311010121

SOKOLOVA, T.A., et al. Acid–Base Characteristics and Clay Mineralogy in the Rhizospheres of Norway Maple and Common Spruce and in the Bulk Mass of Podzolic Soil. Eurasian Soil Science. 2019, 52, 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319060115

SULLIVAN, P.F., et al. Temperature and Microtopography Interact to Control Carbon Cycling in a High Arctic Fen. Ecosystems. 2008, 11, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9107-y

TURPAULT, M.-P., GOBRAN, G.R. and BONNAUD, P. Temporal variations of rhizosphere and bulk soil chemistry in a Douglas fir stand. Geoderma. 2007, 137, 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.005

TURPAULT, M.-P., RIGHI, D. and UTÉRANO, C. Clay minerals: Precise markers of the spatial and temporal variability of the biogeochemical soil environment. Geoderma. 2008, 147, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.07.012

TURPAULT, M.-P., et al. Influence of mature Douglas fir roots on the solid soil phase of the rhizosphere and its solution chemistry. Plant and Soil. 2005, 275, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2584-x

UHLIG, D., AMELUNG, W. and BLANCKENBURG, F. Mineral Nutrients Sourced in Deep Regolith Sustain Long‐Term Nutrition of Mountainous Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2020, 34, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006513

UHLIG, D. and VON BLANCKENBURG, F. How Slow Rock Weathering Balances Nutrient Loss During Fast Forest Floor Turnover in Montane, Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2019, 7:159. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00159

USHARANI, K., ROOPASHREE, K. and NAIK, D. Role of soil physical, chemical and biological properties for soil health improvement and sustainable agriculture. Journal of Pharmacognosy Phytochemistry. 2019, 8(5), 1256-1267.

VIECHTBAUER, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

WANG, Y., et al. Environmental behaviors of phenolic acids dominated their rhizodeposition in boreal poplar plantation forest soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2016, 16, 1858–1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1375-8

WANG, Z., GÖTTLEIN, A. and BARTONEK, G. Effects of growing roots of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on rhizosphere soil solution chemistry. Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science. 2001, 164, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200102)164:1<35::AID-JPLN35>3.0.CO;2-M

WU, Z., et al. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: A meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Global Change Biology. 2011, 17, 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x

YIN, H., WHEELER, E. and PHILLIPS, R.P. Root-induced changes in nutrient cycling in forests depend on exudation rates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014, 78, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.07.022

ZHANG, W., et al. Phyllostachys edulis (moso bamboo) rhizosphere increasing soil microbial activity rather than biomass. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2019, 19, 2913–2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-019-02334-2

ZHAO, Q., et al. Rhizosphere organic phosphorus fractions of Simon poplar and Mongolian pine plantations in a semiarid sandy land of northeastern China. Journal of Arid Land. 2015, 7, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-015-0082-4

ZHENG, M., et al. Effects of phosphorus addition with and without nitrogen addition on biological nitrogen fixation in tropical legume and non-legume tree plantations. Biogeochemistry. 2016, 131, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0265-x

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

HUMMES, A.P., NOVAKOWISKI, J.H., CARVALHO, I.R. and BORTOLUZZI, E.C., 2024. A meta-analysis of physicochemical changes in the rhizosphere and bulk soil under woodlands. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 40, pp. e40005. [Accessed21 December 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-63637. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/63637.

Issue

Section

Agricultural Sciences