Pre-and post-emergence herbicide selectivity in peanuts at an early stage

Augusto Guerreiro Fontoura Costa; Valdinei Sofiatti; Taís de Moraes Falleiro Suassuna

doi:10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-71339

Authors

Augusto Guerreiro Fontoura Costa Embrapa Cotton https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6094-639X
Valdinei Sofiatti Embrapa Cotton
Taís de Moraes Falleiro Suassuna Embrapa Cotton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6360-5168

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-71339

Keywords:

Arachis hypogaea L., Chemical control, Tolerance, Weed

Abstract

Studies on herbicide selectivity to peanuts detected differences according to the evaluated active ingredient and genotypes. This study analyzed the herbicide selectivity of two genotypes at an early stage. Pre-emergence (trifluralin, pendimethalin, diclosulam, s-metolachlor, imazethapyr + flumioxazin, clomazone, sulfentrazone, and imazapic) and post-emergence (imazapic, bentazon, bentazon + imazamox, clethodim, quizalofop-p-ethyl, cloransulam-methyl, s-metolachlor, lactofen, 2,4-D, and carfentrazone) applications were assessed in 1253 OL and 2133 OL breeding lines. The effects of pre- (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides were the same for both genotypes, with PRE not affecting seedling emergence and shoot and root dry mass. Diclosulam was among the most selective PRE herbicides, while the clomazone treatment caused only mild damage. All tested POST herbicides caused damage for up to 14 days after application (DAA). At 28 DAA, most herbicides exhibited the same damage as the untreated control. Lactofen caused mild damage (11.8%) without reducing plant height and shoot and root dry mass. Diclosulam, clomazone, and lactofen are unregistered for peanut crops in Brazil, and further studies should test their selectivity for peanut cultivars. Screening studies on selectivity to imazapic, 2,4-D, and carfentrazone are also relevant to identifying sources of tolerance in peanut germplasm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABUDULAI, M. et al. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to weed and disease management in northern Ghana. International Journal of Pest Management. 2018, 64(3), 204-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2017.1371806

ALAM, T., ANCO, D.J. and RUSTGI, S. 2020. Management of aflatoxins in peanut. Clemson: Clemson Cooperative Extension, Land-Grant Press by Clemson Extension, LGP 1073. https://doi.org/10.34068/report7

ARTHUR, S. et al. Financial return from weed and disease management practices in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in southern Ghana. Peanut Science. 2022, 49(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-491-PS21-9

BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO. Agrofit. 2023. Available from: http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons

COSTA, A. G. F. et al. Normas técnicas para produção integrada de amendoim. Campina Grande: Embrapa Algodão, 2019. Available from: https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1114381/normas-tecnicas-para-producao-integrada-de-amendoim

DAITA, F.E., GERARDO, U., MULKO, J. 2017. Malezas en el cultivo de maní – control y manejo. In: E. M. FERNANDEZ and O. GIAYETTO, eds. El cultivo de maní en Córdoba. 2nd ed, Las Higueras: Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, pp. 331 – 352. Available from: https://www.produccionvegetalunrc.org/docs/ECMC_2.pdf

EMBRAPA - EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5th ed. Brasília: Embrapa, 2018. Available from: https://www.embrapa.br/en/solos/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1094003/sistema-brasileiro-de-classificacao-de-solos

FAYEZ, K.A. et al. Alteration in protein contents and polypeptides of peanut plants due to herbicides and salicylic acid treatments. Journal of Environmental Studies. 2013, 11(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesj.2013.192105

FERREIRA, D.F. Sisvar: a guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2014, 38(2), 109-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001

FERREIRA, R.C.U. et al. An overview of the genetics and genomics of the Urochloa species most commonly used in pastures. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021, 12, 770461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.770461

FERREL, J.A., MACDONALD, G.E. and DEVKOTA, P. Weed management in peanuts. Gainesvile: University of Florida/IFAS Extension, 2020. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-wg008-2020

GRICHAR, W.J., DOTRAY, P.A. and BARING, M.R. Peanut cultivar response to flumioxazin applied preemergence and imazapic applied postemergence. International Journal of Agronomy. 2013, 2013, 371847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/371847

GRICHAR, W.J., DOTRAY, P.A. and BAUGHMAN, T.A. Peanut variety response to postemergence applications of carfentrazone-ethyl and pyraflufen-ethyl. Crop Protection. 2010, 29(9), 1034-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.003

GRICHAR, W.J. and DOTRAY, P.A. Weed control and peanut tolerance with ethalfluralin-based herbicide systems. International Journal of Agronomy. 2012, 2012, 597434. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/597434

HARE, A.T. et al. Impact of weed management on peanut yield and weed populations the following year. Peanut Science. 2019, 46(2), 182-190, https://doi.org/10.3146/PS19-9.1

JAT, R.S. et al. Weed management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in India – a review. Agricultural Reviews. 2011, 32(3), 155 – 171. https://arccjournals.com/journal/agricultural-reviews/ARCC900

JOHNSON, W.C. A Review of weed management challenges in organic peanut production. Peanut Science. 2019, 46(1), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.3146/PS18-12.1

LEON, R.G., FERREL, J.A. and BRECK, B.J. Impact of exposure to 2,4-D and dicamba on peanut injury and yield. Weed Technology. 2014, 28(3), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00187.1

LEON, R.G. and TILLMAN, B.L. Postemergence herbicide tolerance variation in peanut germplasm. Weed Science. 2015, 63(2), 546-554. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-14-00128.1

OLIVEIRA, T.S. et al. Seletividade de formulações e doses de 2,4-D para cultivares de amendoim. South American Sciences. 2021, 2(2), e21155. https://doi.org/10.52755/sas.v2iedesp2.155

PEIXOTO, M.F.S.P. et al. Ação do trifluralin na micorrização e crescimento de plantas de amendoim (Arachis hypogaea). Planta Daninha. 2010, 28(3), 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000300018

PRICE, K.J. et al. Evaluation of peanut tolerance to mid-season applications of PPO-Inhibitor herbicides mixed with different surfactants. Crop Protection. 2021, 143, 105557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105557

RADWAN, D.E.M. et al. Oxidative stress caused by Basagran® herbicide is altered by salicylic acid treatments in peanut plants. Heliyon. 2019, 5(2019), e01791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01791

REDA, L. A. et al. Influence of certain herbicides on some peanut characteristics. Journal of Applied Plant Protection. 2018, 7(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.21608/japp.2018.57958

SAMPAIO, R.M. and FREDO, C.E. Características socioeconômicas e tecnologias na agricultura: um estudo da produção paulista de amendoim a partir do Levantamento das Unidades de Produção Agropecuária (LUPA) 2016/17. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. 2021, 59(4), e236538. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.236538

SEALE, J.W. et al. Evaluation of preemergence and postemergence herbicide programs on weed control and weed seed suppression in Mississippi peanut (Arachis hypogea). Agronomy. 2020, 10(8), 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081058

SILVA, E. et al. Competição entre mamona (Ricinus communis L.) e amendoim. South American Sciences. 2020a, 1(2), e2078. https://doi.org/10.17648/sas.v1i2.78

SILVA, E. et al. Qual o nível de competição da mucuna-preta com a cultura do amendoim? South American Sciences. 2020b, 1(2), e20739. https://doi.org/10.17648/sas.v1i2.39

SPERRY, B.P. et al. Effect of sequential applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides on palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control and peanut response. Weed Technology. 2017, 31(1), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2016.3

SUASSUNA, T.M.F. et al. 2009. Produção integrada de amendoim. In: ZAMBOLIN L. et al. Produção integrada no Brasil. Brasília: MAPA/SDAC, pp. 143-181. Available from: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/producao-integrada/documentos-producao-integrada/producao-integrada-no-brasil.pdf

VELINI, E.D., OSIPE, R. and GAZZIERO, D.L.P. Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. Londrina: SBCPD, 1995.

ZANARDO, H.G. et al. Herbicide selectivity in peanut cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2018, 10(8), 447– 456, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n8p447

ZANARDO, H.G. et al. Residual effect of commonly used herbicides of sugarcane on pre-emergence of peanut cultivars in succession. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2019, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.19.13.08.p1539