Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) exhibits a larger number of trichomes and altered stomatal density relative to the susceptible counterpart
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-64343Keywords:
Herbicides, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Stoma, Leaf surface.Abstract
Following the adoption of Roundup Ready crops, glyphosate spraying frequency increased, while the use of other herbicide modes of action was neglected. Herbicide-resistant biotypes were reported in three major Conyza species in Brazil, including Conyza bonariensis, increasing growers’ bottom line. Considering that leaf surface structures affect proper herbicide deposition, uptake, and performance, this study aimed to characterize epicuticular surface components in glyphosate-resistant (R) and -susceptible (S) C. bonariensis. Conyza spp. seeds were collected in 36 locations in Brazil, and plants were subjected to resistance screening tests by spraying glyphosate at 720 and 1440 g ae ha-1 (0.5X and 1X the label recommended rate, respectively). For resistance level characterization, C. bonariensis biotypes with contrasting responses were selected for glyphosate dose-response assays. Leaf tissues for epicuticular surface analysis were harvested from newly-obtained R and S biotypes at two growth stages. Histological cuts were made on a leaf area of 25 mm² with a blade. Samples were fixed in Karnowsky solution, gradually changed to 100% ethanol, critical-point dried with CO2, and coated with gold, followed by stomatal and trichome density quantification using scanning electron microscopy. Results indicated a poor control with glyphosate in 33 of 36 Conyza spp. biotypes, and a high (31.5) resistance factor was calculated after dose-response trials. Leaf surface analysis indicated that C. bonariensis leaves are amphistomatic and exhibit tectorial trichomes. A higher number of trichomes and altered stomatal density (number.mm²) were quantified in R compared to the S counterpart, potentially reducing glyphosate uptake and effectiveness.
Downloads
References
ALAM - Asociación Latinoamericana de Malezas. Recomendaciones sobre unificación de los sistemas de evaluación en ensayos de control de malezas. ALAM Bogotá. 1974, 1(1), 35-38.
BARROSO, A.A.M., et al. Does sourgrass leaf anatomy influence glyphosate resistance? Comunicata Scientiae. 2015, 6, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v6i4.1124
CANTU, R.M., et al. Herbicide alternative for Conyza sumatrensis control in pre-planting in no-till soybeans. Advances in Weed Science, 2021, 39, e2021000025. 0.51694/AdvWeedSci/2021;39:000012
CARDINALI, V.C.B., et al. Shikimate accumulation, glyphosate absorption and translocation in horseweed biotypes. Planta Daninha. 2015, 33(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100013
FENG, P.C., et al. Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis): retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Science. 2004, 52(4), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-03-137R
FERREIRA, E.A., et al. Glyphosate translocation in hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) biotypes. Planta Daninha. 2008, 26(3), 637-643, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000300020
GAINES, T.A., et al. Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2020, 295(30), 10307-10330. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.013572
GALVANI, J., et al. Leaf anatomy of Lolium multiflorum sensitive and resistant to glyphosate. Planta Daninha. 2012, 30(2), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000200021
GE, X., et al. Rapid vacuolar sequestration: the horseweed glyphosate resistance mechanism. Pest Management Science. 2010, 66(4), 345-348. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fps.1911
GE, X., et al. Glyphosate‐resistant horseweed made sensitive to glyphosate: low‐ temperature suppression of glyphosate vacuolar sequestration revealed by 31P NMR. Pest Management Science. 2011, 67(10), 1215-1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2169
GREENE, D.W. and BUKOVAC, M.J. Stomatal penetration: effect of surfactants and role in foliar absorption. American Journal of Botany. 1974, 61, 101-106.
HEAP, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. 2022. Available from: www.weedscience.org
JOHNSON, G.A., and HOVERSTAD, T. R. Effect of row spacing and herbicide application timing on weed control and grain yield in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technology. 2002, 16, 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0548:EORSAH]2.0.CO;2
KITAJIMA, E.W. and LEITE, B. Introductory course to scanning electron microscopy. 1998, 37 p.
LAZAROTTO, C.A., FLECK, N.G. and VIDAL, R.A. Biology and ecophysiology of hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) and horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Ciência Rural. 2008, 38(3), 852-860. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000300045
LIMA JR, E.C., et al. Physioanatomy traits of leaves in young plants of Cupania vernalis Camb. subjected to different shading levels. Revista Árvore,. 2006, 30(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622006000100005
LÓPEZ-OVEJERO, R.F., CARVALHO, S.J.P. and VARGAS, L. (2008). Resistência de plantas daninhas aos herbicidas inibidores da ACCase (Grupo A) In: Christoffoleti PJ, López-Ovejero R Aspectos de resistência de plantas daninhas a herbicidas, Piracicaba: ESALQ/USP, pp. 50-61.
MAROCHIO, C.A., et al. Genetic admixture in species of Conyza (Asteraceae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy. 2017, 39(4), 437-445. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v39i4.32947
MARQUES, R.P., RODELLA, R.A. and MARTINS, D. Characteristics of the leaf anatomy of Surinam grass and Alexandergrass related to sensitivity to herbicides. Planta Daninha. 2012, 30, 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400015
MONQUERO, P.A., CURY, J.C. and CHRISTOFFOLETI, P.J. Control with glyphosate and general leaf surface characterization of Commelina benghalensis, Ipomoea hederifolia, Richardia brasiliensis and Galinsoga parviflora. Planta Daninha. 2005, 23(1), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582005000100015
MOREIRA, M.S., et al. Glyphosate-resistance in Conyza canadensis and C. bonariensis. Planta Daninha. 2007, 25(1), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000100017
PEDROSO, R.M., et al. Mesotrione use for selective, post-emergence control of glyphosate-resistant Conyza spp. in black oats. Advances in Weed Science. 2021, 39, e20210026. http://dx.doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2021;39:00021
PEREIRA, V.G.C. Characterization of Conyza sumatrensis resistance to paraquat herbicide. Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio Mesquita Filho”. Botucatu, SP,Brazil, 2019.
PIASECKI, C., et al. Oxidative stress and differential antioxidant enzyme activity in glyphosate-resistant and-sensitive hairy fleabane in response to glyphosate treatment. Bragantia. 2019, 78(3), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20180289
PLACIDO, H.F. Morphological characterization of the foliar surface of Chloris elata resistant to glyphosate and management of tall windmill grass and sourgrass during the off-season in the soybean / maize succession system. Thesis, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil, 2018.
PROCÓPIO, S.O., et al. Leaf anatomical studies in weed species widely common in Brazil: III - Galinsoga parviflora, Crotalaria incana, Conyza bonariensis and Ipomoea cairica. Planta Daninha. 2003, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582003000100001
QUEIROZ, A.R.S., et al. Rapid necrosis: a novel plant resistance mechanism to 2,4-D. Weed Science. 2020, 68(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2019.65
RSTUDIO TEAM. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA, 2022. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/
RYAN, G.F. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Science. 1970, 18, 614-616.
SCHONHERR, J. Characterization of aqueous pores in plant cuticles and permeation of ionic solutes. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006, 57, 2471-2491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj217
SILVA, A.A. Controle de plantas daninhas. Brasília: ABEAS, 2000.
SILVA, A.A. Biologia e Controle de Plantas Daninhas. Brasília: ABEAS, 2002.
SHIELDS, E.J., et al. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Science. 2006, 54(6), 1063-1067. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-097R1.1
STREIBIG, J.C. Herbicide bioassay. Weed Research. 1988, 28, 479-484.
SWITZER, C.M. The existence of 2, 4-D resistant strains of wild carrot. Proceedings of the North Eastern Weed Control Conference. 1957, 11, 315-318.
VARGAS, L., et al. Conyza bonariensis biotypes resistant to the glyphosate in southern Brazil. Planta Daninha. 2007, 25(3), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000300017
VILA-AIUB, M., NEVE, P. and Roux, F. A unified approach to the estimation and interpretation of resistance costs in plants. Heredity. 2011, 107, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2011.29
WHITEHEAD, C.W. and SWITZER, C.M. The differential response of strains of wild carrot to 2, 4-D and related herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1963, 43, 255-262.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luisa Carolina Baccin, Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht, Rafael Munhoz Pedroso, Lucas da Silva Araújo, Mateus Augusto Dotta, Ricardo Victoria Filho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.