Tifton 85 grass performance following chemical and organic fertilizers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-63730Keywords:
Cynodon spp., Fertilization, Nutritional value.Abstract
The Tifton 85 grass offers high yield and nutritional value. It is demanding in soil fertility and highly responsive to fertilization. However, the response to fertilization can be affected by the source, dose, and installment of fertilizers, as well as environmental conditions. Evaluations of the joint application of chemical and organic fertilizers are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical and organic fertilization on agronomic characteristics, mineral use efficiencies, and bromatological composition of Tifton 85 grass, and determine fertilization strategies to optimize the yield and nutritional value of Tifton 85 grass. The findings were influenced by grass cuttings. The highest values for height and accumulated dry matter productivity were obtained with the highest fertilizer doses. The leaf/stem ratio was not affected by fertilization. The highest mineral use efficiencies were obtained with 200 and 400 kg of N/ha/year of NPK 20-00-20 formulation and up to 10 t/ha/year of poultry litter (PL), and these values decreased when applying high PL doses. The crude protein content increased, while the contents of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber decreased. The protein fractions and in vitro dry matter digestibility were not affected by fertilization. The potassium content increased with high fertilizer doses. Applying 350 to 400 kg of N/ha/year of NPK 20-00-20 formulation and 25 to 30 t/ha/year of PL promoted the highest accumulated dry matter productivity. Applying 200 to 400 kg of N/ha/year of NPK 20-00-20 formulation and 10/ha/year of PL is recommended for optimizing mineral use efficiencies. As for bromatological composition, increasing the doses of both fertilizers was beneficial in reducing fiber contents, but only organic fertilization increased crude protein content.
Downloads
References
ALDERMAN, P.D., et al. Carbohydrate and nitrogen reserves relative to regrowth dynamics of ‘tifton 85’ bermudagrass as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Crop Science. 2011a, 51(4), 1727-1738. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0516
ALDERMAN, P., BOOTE, D.K.J. and SOLLENBERGER, L.E. Regrowth dynamics of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass as affected by nitrogen fertilization. Crop Science. 2011b, 51(4), 1716-1726. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0515
ALVIM, M.J., et al. Resposta do Tifton 85 a doses de nitrogênio e intervalos de cortes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 1999, 34(12), 2345-2352. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X1999001200022
Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Washington: AOAC International, 1995.
BORGES, B.M.M.N., et al. Growth, herbage accumulation, and nutritive value of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass as affected by nitrogen fertilization strategies. Crop Science. 2017, 57(6), 3333-3342. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0890
BRINK, G.E., SISTANI, K.R. and ROWE, D.E. Nutrient uptake of hybrid and common bermudagrass fertilized with broiler litter. Agronomy Journal. 2004, 96, 1509-1515. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1509
CANTARUTTI, R.B., et al. Pastagens. In: RIBEIRO, A.C.; GUIMARÃES, P.T.G.; ALVAREZ V., V.H. Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais - 5° Aproximação. Viçosa, MG: CFSEMG, 1999. p.332-341.
COLUSSI, G., et al. Avaliação do efeito de fontes e doses de nitrogênio na taxa de acúmulo diária de matéria seca de tifton 85. Synergismos Scyentifica. 2009, 4(1).
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA – EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5th ed. Rio de Janeiro, 2018.
HOLDEN, L.A. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. Journal of Animal Science. 1999, 82(8), 1791-1794. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
JOHNSON, C.R., et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and harvest date on yield, digestibilitym fiiber, and protein fractions of tropical grasses. Journal Animal Science. 2001, 79(9), 2439-2448. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7992439x
KERING, M.K., et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rate and harvest season on forage yield, quality, and macronutrient concentrations in midland bermuda grass. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2011, 42, 1958-1971. https://doi:.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.591470
LIU, K., et al. Grazing intensity and nitrogen fertilization affect litter responses in ‘tifton 85’ bermudagrass pastures: I. Mass, deposition rate, and chemical composition. Agronomy Journal. 2011a, 103(1), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0319
LIU, K., et al. Grazing intensity and nitrogen fertilization affect litter responses in ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass pastures: II. Decomposition and nitrogen mineralization. Agronomy Journal. 2011b, 103(1), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0320
LIU, K., et al. Grazing management effects on productivity, nutritive value, and persistence of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass. Crop Science. 2011c, 51(1), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.02.0122
OLIVEIRA, A.P.P., et al. Respostas do capim-Tifton 85 à aplicação de nitrogênio: Cobertura do solo, índice de área foliar e interceptação da radiação solar. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2010, 62(2), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000200024
PINHEIRO, J. et al. R Core Team NLME: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models: R Package Version. 2013, 3, 1-110.
QUARESMA, J.P.S., et al. Produção e composição bromatológica do capim-tifton 85 (Cynodon spp.) submetido a doses de nitrogênio. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 2011, 3(2), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v33i2.9261
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014. http://www.R-project.org/
RIBEIRO, K.G. and PEREIRA, O.G. Produtividade de matéria seca e composição mineral do capim-tifton 85 sob diferentes doses de nitrogênio e idades de rebrotação. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2011. 35(4), 811-816. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000400022
ROCHA, G.P., et al. Adubação nitrogenada em gramíneas do gênero Cynodon. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 2002, 3(1), 1-9.
SARKAR, D. Multivariate data visualization with R. New York: Springer, 2008.
SILVA, D.J. and QUEIROZ, A.C. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3th ed. Viçosa/MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2002.
SISTANI, K.R., et al. Laboratory and field evaluation of broiler litter nitrogen mineralization. Bioresource Technology. 2008, 99(7), 2603-2611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.069
SISTANI, K.R., ADELI, A. and TEWOLDE, H. Apparent use efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus from litter applied to bermudagrass. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2010, 41(15), 1873-1884. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.492444
SNIFFEN, C.J., et al. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science. 1992, 70(11), 3562-3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
SOUZA, G.B., NOGUEIRA, A.R.A. and BATISTA, L.A.R. Avaliação e aplicação de métodos de análise para o fracionamento do nitrogênio em amostras de alimentos para animais. São Carlos/SP: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. 2006. Available from: http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/48353/4/Boletim04.pdf
TILLEY, J.M.A. and TERRY, R.A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science. 1963, 18(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
VAN SOEST, P.J., ROBERTSON, J.B. and LEWIS, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal Dairy Science. 1991, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
WOODARD, K.R. and SOLLENBERGER, L.E. Broiler litter vs. ammonium nitrate as nitrogen source for bermudagrass hay production: yield, nutritive value, and nitrate leaching. Crop Science. 2011, 51(3):1342-1352. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0342
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Naiara Taís Alves da Silva, Alex de Matos Teixeira, Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves, Daniel Ottoni, Luigi Francis Lima Cavalcanti, Thaís Figueiredo Pereira, Flávia Cristina de Oliveira e Silva, Diogo Gonzaga Jayme
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.