Physiological and morphological responses of two beans common genotype to water stress at different phenological stages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-59855Keywords:
Phaseolus vulgaris L., Physiological traits, Stage-based deficit irrigation, Water use efficiency, Yield attributes.Abstract
Comprehension of the bean responses of beans common under to water deficit is an important tool in agricultural planning, like sowing time, and deficit irrigation management strategies. The study aimed to understand the morpho-physiological responses and yield attributes of two common bean genotypes submitted to water stress at different phenological stages. The study was carried out in a greenhouse, in randomized block scheme with five repetitions. To achieve the objectives deficit irrigation of 25% of crop evapotranspiration was practiced during vegetative (DI-V), flowering (DI-F), and pod filling (DI-PF) stages. A non-deficit irrigated (NDI) and deficit irrigated through vegetative to pod filling stages (DI-VP) treatments were added for comparison. The following morphophysiological responses and yield attributes were evaluated: net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, chlorophyll index, number of trifoliate leaves, chlorophyll index, leaf area, number of grains per plant, number of grains per pod, number of pods per plant, the mass of thousand grains, harvest index, and water use efficiency. The beans genotype under DI-V exhibited acclimation, observed by the relative increment with NDI of 195%, 759%, and 231% of net assimilation of CO2, stomatal conductance, and leaf transpiration, respectively. Plants under treatment DI-PF experienced dis-stress and plastic responses as leaf losses and exhaustion of gas exchanges. Treatment DI-V received 11% less water than NDI and exhibited equal yield, resulting in higher water use efficiency. Yield attributes correlations indicated that yield penalty might be related to pods abortion, which not occurred to plants under DI-V.
Downloads
References
ALLEN, R.G., et al. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. 1° ed. Rome: FAO, 1998. (FAO – Irrigation and
Drainage Paper, 56). Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/X0490E/X0490E00.htm
ANA. Agência Nacional de Águas e Saneamento Básico. Atlas irrigação: uso da água na agricultura irrigada. 2° ed. Brasília: ANA, 2021. Available
from: https://portal1.snirh.gov.br/ana/apps/storymaps/stories/a874e62f27544c6a986da1702a911c6b
BEEBE, S., et al. 2012. Improving resource use efficiency and reducing risk of common bean production in Africa, Latin America, and the
Caribbean. In: HERSHEY, C., NEATE, P. (Org.). Eco-Efficiency: From vision to reality. Colombia: CIAT, pp. 117–134.
BITOCCHI, E. et al. Beans (Phaseolus ssp.) as a model for understanding crop evolution. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017, 8, 722.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00722
BOUTRAA, T. and SANDERS, F.E. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2001, 187(4), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00525.x
BROUGHTON, W.J., et al. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant and Soil. 2003, 252, 55–128.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024146710611
CANIZELLA, B.T., et al. Efficiency of magnesium use by common bean varieties regarding yield, physiological components, and nutritional
status of plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2015, 46(11), 1376–1390.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1043452
CHAI, Q., et al. Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2016.
, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0338-6
CHAVES, M.M., et al. How Plants Cope with Water Stress in the Field. Photosynthesis and Growth. Annals of Botany. 2002, 89(7), 907–916.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf105
DARKWA, K., et al. Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia. The Crop Journal.
, 4(5), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.007
FIGUEIREDO, E.S., SANTOS, M.E. and GARCIA, A. Modelos de determinação não destrutivo da área foliar do feijoeiro comum (Phaseolus
vulgaris L.). Nucleus. 2012, 9, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.3738/1982.2278.749
FOGAÇA, A.M. and BARBOSA, E.A.A. Selecting key traits to indicrectly assess common bean growth under water stress. Agricultural
Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 2020, 22(3), 151–158.
Bioscience Journal | 2023 | vol. 39, e39053 | https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-59855 12
Physiological and morphological responses of two beans common genotype to water stress at different phenological stages
FRANÇA, C.M.G., et al. Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress.
Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2000, 43(3) 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00060-X
HEINEMANN, A.B., STONE, L.F. and SILVA, S.C. 2009. Feijão. In: MONTEIRO, J. E.B.A. (Org.). Agrometeorologia dos Cultivos: o fator
meteorológico na produção agrícola. Brasília:INMET, pp. 183-201.
KIRDA, C. 2002. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. In: FAO (Org.). Deficit Irrigation
Practices. Rome:FAO, pp. 3-10. Available from: http://www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/004/y3655e/y3655e01.pdf
KUMAR, A., et al. Physiological and morphological responses of four different rice cultivars to soil water potential based deficit irrigation
management strategies. Field Crop Research. 2017, 205, 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.026
MELO, L.C., et al. BRS Estilo: common bean cultivar with Carioca grain, upright growth and high yield potential. Crop Breeding and Applied
Biotechnology. 2010. 10, 377–379. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332010000400015
PEEL, M.C., FINLAYSON, B.L. and MCMAHON, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System
Sciences. 2007, 11(5), 1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
PRASAD, P.V.V., et al. Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on seed-set and yield of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Global
Change Biology. 2002, 8(8), 710–721. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00508.x
R CORE TEAM. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
SOURESHJANI, K.H., et al. Responses of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water
Management. 2019, 213, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.038
WEBBER, H. A., et al. Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agricultural
Water Management. 2006, 86(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.012
WICKHAM, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for data analysis. 2° ed. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
YORDANOV, I., VELIKOVA, V. and TSONEV, T. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica. 2000, 38(2), 171–
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alisson Marcos Fogaça, Aline Garcia de Castro, Eduardo Augusto Agnellos Barbosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.