What is the optimal fertigation start time and frequency in lettuce seedlings?





Fertigation management, Lactuca sativa, Lettuce fertilization, Nutrient solution, Seedling production.


Although lettuce is one of the most important vegetable crops cultivated in Brazil, producers conduct seedling production empirically, as there are no published reports on the optimal start time and management strategy for seedling fertigation. The present aimed to assess the influence of fertigation management on the growth, physiological aspects and nutritional status of lettuce seedlings and to determine the optimal fertigation start time and frequency. Two experiments were conducted, each with a randomized block design and six repetitions. The first consisted of six treatments, namely six fertigation start times at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 d after emergence (DAE), and the second consisted of five treatments, representing different application frequencies at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 d intervals. The assessment of nutrient accumulation levels and biometric and physiological characteristics of the seedlings were performed after transplanting. Fertigation start times significantly affected 14 of the 18 variables assessed, particularly the number of leaves, shoot dry weight, leaf area, initial chlorophyll fluorescence, and P, K, Ca, Mg, and S accumulation. The best results for ten variables were obtained when fertigation began at emergence, with values 17.77 - 35.63% higher than those at fertigation onset at 15 DAE. Application frequency only influenced chlorophyll content and N, P, K, and S accumulation, with optimal results obtained at 3 - 6 d intervals. Beginning fertigation at plant emergence favors dry weight production, nutrition and photosynthesis and shortens the production time of lettuce seedlings. The optimal start time for lettuce seedling fertigation is at emergence, with application performed every 6 d.


Download data is not yet available.


ALVAREZ, J.M., et al. Vermicompost and biochar substrates can reduce nutrients leachates on containerized ornamental plant production. Horticultura Brasileira. 2019, 37(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620190107

ARAÚJO, T.O., et al. Understanding photosynthetic and metabolic adjustments in iron hyperaccumulators grass. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology. 2020, 32, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00176-9

BECK, H., et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data. 2018, 5, 180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214

BENINNI, E.R.Y., TAKAHASHI, H.W. and NEVES, C.S.V. Concentração e quantidade de macronutrientes em áreas cultivadas em sistemas hidropônicos e convencionais. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. 2005, 26, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p273

BUSSOTTI, F., et al. Conclusive remarks. Reliability and comparability of chlorophyll fluorescence data from several field teams. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2011, 73, 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.10.023

CARMONA, E., et al. Use of grape marc compost as substrate for vegetable seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae. 2012, 137, 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.023

CHIOMENTO, J.L.T., et al. Water retention of substrates potentiates the quality of lettuce seedlings. Advances in Horticultural Science. 2019, 33(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.13128/ahs-23599

CINTRA, P.H.N., et al. Análise de fluorescência da clorofila a em mudas de cafeeiro sob estresse hídrico. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020, 6(5), 27006-27014. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n5-301

DALASTRA, C., TEIXEIRA FILHO, M.C.M. and VARGAS, P.F. Periodicity of exposure of hydroponic lettuce plants to nutrient solution. Revista Caatinga. 2020, 33(1), 81-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252020v33n109rc

DE BOODT, M. and VERDONCK, O. The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta Horticulturae. 1972, 26, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1972.26.5

DESOTGIU, R., et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis along a vertical gradient of the crown in a poplar (Oxford clone) subjected to ozone and water stress. Tree Physiology. 2012, 32(8), 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps062

EMBRAPA - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Manual de métodos de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Brasília: Embrapa, 2009.

FÁVARIS, N.A.B., et al. Qualidade fisiológica de genótipos de tomate fertilizados com lodo de esgoto. Nucleus. 2016, 13(2), 231-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.3738/1982.2278.1653

FERREIRA, K.S., et al. Crescimento e acúmulo de nutrientes em mudas de aceroleiras em função da aplicação de diferentes doses de nitrogênio e potássio. Colloquium Agrariae. 2019, 15(2), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.5747/ca.2019.v15.n2.a283

FRUGERI, V.C., ORIOLI JÚNIOR, V. and BERNARDES, J.V.S. Épocas de início da fertirrigação para produção de mudas de alface. Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica. 2017, 1(115), 1-15.

FURLANI, P.R., et al. Cultivo hidropônico de plantas. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico, Boletim Técnico 180, 1999.

GNOATTO, E., et al. Comparison of two pressurized irrigation systems on lettuce seedlings production. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2018, 12(5), 699-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.18.12.05.PNE747

GOLTSEV, V., et al. Drought-induced modifications of photosynthetic electron transport in intact leaves: Analysis and use of neural networks as a tool for a rapid non-invasive estimation, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 2012, 1817(8), 1490-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.04.018

GOTTARDINI, E., et al. Chlorophyll-related indicators are linked to visible ozone symptoms: Evidence from a field study on native Viburnum lantana L. plants in northern Italy. Ecological Indicators. 2014, 39, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.021

GUSATTI, M., et al. Performance of agricultural substrates in the production of lettuce seedlings (Lactuca sativa L.). Scientific Electronic Archives Issue. 2019, 12(5), 40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.36560/1252019807

KALAJI, H.M., et al. Identification of nutrient deficiency in maize and tomato plants by in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014a, 8, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.029

KALAJI, H.M., et al. Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues. Photosynth Research. 2014b, 122, 121–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-014-0024-6

KIRKBY, E. Introduction, definition, and classification of nutrientes. In: MARSCHNER, P. (ed) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd ed. Academic Press. 2012, 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00001-7

KRASTEVA, V., et al. Drought induced damages of photosynthesis in bean and plantain plants analyzed in vivo by chlorophyll a fluorescence. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013, 19(2), 39-44.

LIMA, M.V.G., et al. Vermicomposts as substrates in the seedlings performance of lettuce and arugula. Green Journal of Agroecology and Sustainable Development. 2019, 14(3), 374-381. https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v14i3.6499

OUKARROUM, A., STRASSER, R.J. and SCHANSKER, G. Heat stress and the photosynthetic electron transport chain of the lichen Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Ach. in the dry and the wet state: differences and similarities with the heat stress response of higher plants. Photosynth Research. 2012, 111(3):303‐314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-012-9728-7

OUKARROUM, A., GOLTSEV, V. and STRASSER, R.J. Temperature Effects on Pea Plants Probed by Simultaneous Measurements of the Kinetics of Prompt Fluorescence, Delayed Fluorescence and Modulated 820 nm Reflection. PLos One. 2013, 8(3), e59433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059433

R CORE TEAM R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2019.

REIS, F. and CAMPOSTRINI, E. Microaspersão de água sobre a copa: um estudo relacionado às trocas gasosas e à eficiência fotoquímica em plantas de mamoeiro. Revista Brasileira Agrociência. 2011, 17(1-4), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.18539/cast.v17i1.2033

SAKATA. Vanda. 2022. Available at https://www.sakata.com.br/hortalicas/folhosas/alface/crespa/vanda

SALVATORI, E., et al. Different O3 response of sensitive and resistant snap bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): The key role of growth stage, stomatal conductance, and PSI activity. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2013, 87, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.008

SILVA, V.L., et al. Production of lettuce seedlings on alternative substrates with different agricultural compositions. Scientific Electronic Archives Issue. 2018, 11(3), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.36560/1132018513

SOUZA, R.S., et al. Dry matter production and macronutrient leaf composition in lettuce under fertigation with nitrogen, potassium and silicon. Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient. 2015, 19(12), 1166-1171. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n12p1166-1171

TAIZ, L., et al. Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2017.

TEJADA, M. and BENÍTEZ C. Application of vermicompost and compost on tomato growth in Greenhouses. Compost Science and Utilization. 2015, 23(2), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2014.975867




How to Cite

NETO, O.F. da S., MOREIRA, Édimo F.A., ORIOLI JÚNIOR, V., CASTOLDI, R., TORRES, J.L..R. and CHARLO, H.C. de O., 2023. What is the optimal fertigation start time and frequency in lettuce seedlings?. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 39, pp. e39045. [Accessed24 June 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-59702. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/59702.



Agricultural Sciences