Bioactive compounds and physical-chemical characteristics of two genotypes of peach trees submitted to nitrogen fertilization

Authors

  • Caroline Farias Barreto Faculdade IDEAU
  • Leticia Vanni Fereira Private Practice
  • Renan Navroski Universidade Federal de Pelotas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-6172
  • Jorge Atilio Benati Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Rufino Fernando Flores Cantillano Embrapa Clima Temperado
  • Marcia Vizzotto Embrapa Clima Temperado https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-4980
  • Gilberto Nava Embrapa Clima Temperado https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8059-1052
  • Luis Eduardo Correa Antunes Embrapa Clima Temperado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-54184

Keywords:

Fruit quality, Mineral nutrition, Prunus persica, Ripening.

Abstract

Nitrogen, which is the primary nutrient peach trees need, may affect their fruit quality. Thus, this study aimed at evaluating the effect of nitrogen fertilization on two genotypes of peach trees, regarding their fruit quality, in three consecutive crops. The experiment was carried out in the experimental area that belongs to the Embrapa Clima Temperado, located in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, from 2016, 2016, 2017 and 2018. Four doses of nitrogen (0, 60, 120 and 180 Kg ha-1) and two peach tree genotypes (‘Cascata 1513’ and ‘Cascata 1067’) were used. For the fruit, we evaluated epidermis color, pulp firmness, epidermis firmness, soluble solids concentration, titratable acidity, concentration of total phenolic compounds, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity. Fruit underwent physical, chemical and bioactive compound analyses. Results showed that the highest dose of nitrogen (180 Kg ha-1) applied to the soil retards fruit ripening, while no application of nitrogen fertilization brings fruit maturation forward. Nitrogen fertilization via soil does not favor anthocyanins in fruit. Doses of 60 and 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen are recommended because they lead to improvement in peach color, epidermis firmness and acidity. Peach tree genotypes influence soluble solids, juice pH, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of their fruit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALCOBENDAS, R., et al. Effects of irrigation and fruit position on size, colour, firmness and sugar contents of fruits in a mid-late maturing peach cultivar. Scientia Horticulturae. 2013, 164, 330-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.09.048

ALVARES, C.A., et al. Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2013, 22(6), 711-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

BARRETO, C.F., et al. Nitrogen fertilization associated with cold storage and its impacts on the maintenance of peach quality. Bioscience Journal. 2020, 36(3), 896-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n3a2020-47888

BRAND-WILLIAMS, W., CUVELIER, M.E. and BERSET, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 1995, 28(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

BRUNETTO, G., et al. Adubação nitrogenada em ciclos consecutivos e seu impacto na produção e na qualidade do pêssego. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2007, 42(12), 1721-1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007001200008

CQFS-RS/SC, COMISSÃO DE QUÍMICA E FERTILIDADE DO SOLO. 2016. Manual de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. 11ª ed. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo - Núcleo regional Sul.

CUQUEL, F.L., et al. Nitrogen and potassium fertilization affecting the plum postharvest quality. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2011, 33, 328-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-29452011000500041

CRISOSTO, C.H. and COSTA, G. 2008. Preharvest Factors Affecting Peach Quality. In. LAYNE, D. R.; BASSI, D. eds. The peach: botany, production and uses. CABI, pp. 303.

CREMASCO, J.P.G., et al. Qualidade pós-colheita de oito variedades de pêssego. Comunicata Scientiae. 2016, 7(3), 334-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.14295/CS.v7i3.1404

DELLA BRUNA, E. and BACK, A. J. Adubação nitrogenada em pessegueiros ‘Aurora’ e ‘Chimarrita’. Tecnologia e Ambiente. 2014, 20(3), 71-80. http://doi.org/10.18616/ta.v20i0.156

DOLINSKI, M.A., et al. Produção, teor foliar e qualidade de frutos do pessegueiro 'Chimarrita' em função da adubação nitrogenada, na região da Lapa-PR. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2005, 27(2), 295-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452005000200027

DOLINSKI, M.A., et al. Quality peach produced in fertilizer doses of nitrogen and green pruning. Bragantia. 2018, 77(1), 134-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2016307

DUARTE, T.S. and PEIL, R.M.N. Relações fonte: dreno e crescimento vegetativo do meloeiro. Horticultura Brasileira. 2010, 28(3), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362010000300005

FALGUERA, V., et al. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on polyphenol oxidase activity in peach fruits. Scientia Horticulturae. 2012, 143(13), 155-157. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.05.014

FERREIRA, D.F. Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2014, 38(2), 235-243. http://dx.doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001

FERREIRA, L.V., et al. Qualidade de pêssegos submetidos à adubação nitrogenada. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha. 2016, 17(2), 231-240. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81349041009

FERREIRA, L.V., et al. Nitrogen fertilization in consecutive cycles and its impact on high-density peach crops. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2018, 56(2), 172-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2018000200005

FULEKI, T. and FRANCIS, F. J. Quantitative methods for anthocyanins. Extraction and determination of total anthocyanin in cranberries. Journal Food Science. 1968, 33(1), 72-77. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb00887.x

GONÇALVES, M.A., et al. Qualidade de fruto e produtividade de pessegueiros submetidos a diferentes épocas de poda. Ciência Rural. 2014, 44(8), 1334-1340. http://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20120617

KERBAUY, G.B. 2012. Fisiologia Vegetal. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.

LEAL, R.M., et al. Adubação nitrogenada na implantação e na formação de pomares de caramboleira. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2007, 42(8), 1111-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007000800007

OLIVOS, A., et al. Fruit Phosphorous and nitrogen deficiencies affect ‘Grand Pearl’ nectarine flesh browning. HortsScience. 2012, 47(3), 391-394. http://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.3.391

PASCUAL, M., et al. Relationship between polyphenol oxidase activity and nutrition, maturity and quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2013, 93(13), 3384-3389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6190

PICOLOTTO, L., et al. Características vegetativas, fenológicas e produtivas do pessegueiro cultivar Chimarrita enxertado em diferentes porta-enxertos. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2009, 44(6), 583-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000600006

RUFAT, J., et al. Interaction between water and nitrogen management in peaches for processing. Irrigation Science. 2011, 29(4), 321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0234-4

SANTOS, H.G., et al. 2006. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos.

SANTOS, C.M., et al. Atividade antioxidante de frutos de quatro cultivares de pessegueiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2013, 25(2), 339-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452013000200002

SEGANTINI, D.M., et al. Caracterização da polpa de pêssegos produzidos em são Manuel-SP. Ciência Rural. 2012, 42(1), 52-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012000100009

STRISSEL, T., et al. Growth-promoting nitrogen nutrition affects flavonoid biosynthesis in young apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) leaves. Plant Biology. 2005, 7(6), 677-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872989

SWAIN, T. and HILLS, W.E. The phenolic constituents of Punnus domestica. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1959, 10(1), 235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740100110

TAIZ, L., et al. 2017. Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

TREVISAN, R., et al. Perfil e preferências do consumidor de pêssego (Prunus persica) em diferentes regiões produtoras no Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2010, 32(1), 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452010005000011

VASHISTH, T., et al. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Subtropical Peach Fruit Quality: Organic Acids, Phytochemical Content, and Total Antioxidant Capacity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 2017, 142(5), 393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/JASHS04011-16

Downloads

Published

2022-08-19

How to Cite

BARRETO, C.F., VANNI FEREIRA, L., NAVROSKI, R., BENATI, J.A., CANTILLANO, R.F.F., VIZZOTTO, M., NAVA, G. and CORREA ANTUNES, L.E., 2022. Bioactive compounds and physical-chemical characteristics of two genotypes of peach trees submitted to nitrogen fertilization. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 38, pp. e38067. [Accessed31 August 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-54184. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54184.

Issue

Section

Agricultural Sciences