Agronomic characterization of sunflower cultivars for animal feeding in tropical conditions

Saulo Almeida  Sousa; Vagner Maximino  Leite; Vanessa de Oliveira  Almeida; Douglas dos Santos  Pina; Luana Marta de Almeida  Rufino; Aracele Vieira  Santos; Alexandre Fernandes  Perazzo; Thiago Carvalho da  Silva; Luis Gabriel Alves  Cirne; Gleidson Giordano Pinto de  Carvalho

doi:10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-53618

Authors

Saulo Almeida Sousa Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-7781
Vagner Maximino Leite Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-5133
Vanessa de Oliveira Almeida Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-4429
Douglas dos Santos Pina Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-1453
Luana Marta de Almeida Rufino Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-8739
Aracele Vieira Santos Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-0798
Alexandre Fernandes Perazzo Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6735-8187
Thiago Carvalho da Silva Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-3950
Luis Gabriel Alves Cirne Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-1587
Gleidson Giordano Pinto de Carvalho Universidade Federal da Bahia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-6782

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-53618

Keywords:

Animal Feeding, Helianthus annuus L., Plant Production.

Abstract

This study was developed to examine morpho-agronomic traits of 18 sunflower cultivars and identify superior cultivars in terms of grain yield, forage quality, or both, for animal feeding. Twenty-two morpho-agronomic traits related to plant development and architecture; earliness of maturity; grain yield (achenes); dry matter yield; and dry matter content were evaluated. Cultivars Hélio 253, Hélio 358, Embrapa 122, BRS 321, and Hélio 360 showed inflorescence at the final stage. Aguará 4 showed the lowest flowering rate, characterizing it as late-maturing. For grain yield, cultivars Charrua, Olisun 3, BRS 321, Paraíso 103CL, Paraíso 65, Aguará 6, and CF 101 are recommended, as they showed the highest achene yields (average: 1,541.67 to 2,148.81 kg.ha⁻¹, respectively). Cultivars Charrua, Hélio 251, Olisun 3, Hélio 360, Paraíso 55, and Paraíso 103CL exhibited higher dry matter yields (9,550.93 to 11,789.91 kg ha⁻¹) and were thus indicated for forage production. Cultivars Charrua, Olisun 3, BRS 321, Paraíso 103CL, Paraíso 65, Aguará 6, and CF 101 are recommended for grain yield, for the diet of monogastric animals; Charrua, Hélio 251, Olisun 3, Hélio 360, Paraíso 55, and Paraíso 103CL for forage yield, for ruminant feeding; and Charrua, Olisun 3, and Paraíso 103CL for both purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AFFÉRRI, F.S., et al. Avaliação de cultivares de girassol, em diferentes épocas de semeadura, no sul do Estado do Tocantins, safra 2005/2006. Amazônia: Ciência & Desenvolvimento. 2008, 4(7), 79-87.

AGRIANUAL. Anuário da Agricultura Brasileira. São Paulo: Informa Economics FNP, 2016.

AKBARI, P., GHALAVAND, A., MODARRES, S.A. and ALIKHANI, M.A. The effect of biofertilizers, nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on grain yield and seed quality of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2011, 7(1), 173-184.

ALBERIO, C., et al. A new sunflower high oleic mutation confers stable oil grain fatty acid composition across environments. European Journal of Agronomyro. 2016, 73, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.10.003

AMORIM, E.P., RAMOS, N.P., UNGARO, M.R.G. and KIIHL, T.A. Correlations and path analysis in sunflower. Bragantia. 2008, 67(2), 307-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052008000200006

AQUINO, L.A., SILVA, F.D.B. and BERGER, P.G. Agronomic characteristics and nutritional status of irrigated sunflower cultivars. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2013, 17(5), 551-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000500013

BISCARO, G.A., et al. Nitrogen side dressing fertilization in irrigated sunflower under conditions of Cassilândia-MS. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2008, 32(5), 1366-1373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000500002

BRAZ, M.R.S. and ROSSETTO, C.A.V. Seedlings establishment and plants performance as affected by sunflower achenes vigour. Ciência Rural. 2009, 39(7), 1997-2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000146

CARVALHO, C.G.P., et al., 2005. Genética do Girassol. In: R.M.V.B.C. LEITE, A.M. BRIGHENTI and C. CASTRO, eds. Girassol no Brasil. Londrina: EMBRAPA, pp. 219-267.

CASTRO, C. and FARIAS, J.R.B., 2005. Ecofisiologia do girassol. In: R.M.V.B.C. LEITE, A.M. BRIGHENTI and C. CASTRO, eds. Girassol no Brasil. Londrina: EMBRAPA, pp. 501-546.

CASTRO, C., et al. A cultura do girassol. Londrina: EMBRAPA, 1996.

CRUZ, C.D. and REGAZZI, A.J. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2nd ed. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 1997.

DALLAGNOL, A., VIEIRA, O.V. and LEITE, R.M.V.B.C., 2005. Origem e histórico do girassol. In: R.M.V.B.C. LEITE, A.M. BRIGHENTI and C. CASTRO, eds. Girassol no Brasil. Londrina: EMBRAPA, pp. 1-14.

DEL GATTO, A., et al. Adaptability of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) high oleic hybrids to different Italian areas for biodiesel production. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015, 75, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.002

FERNANDES, G.F., EVANGELISTA, A.F. and BORGES, L.S. Potential of forage species for silage production - review. Nutritime Revista Eletrônica. 2016, 13(3), 4652-4656.

GOMES, E.P., et al. Grain yield, oil and dry matter of sunflower under different depths of supplementary irrigation. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2012, 16(3), 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662012000300001

GOMES, E.P., et al. Sunflower growth and yield under irrigagation levels in no tillage system in arenito caiuá region - Paraná State. Brazilian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 2010, 15(4), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2010v15n4p373

HANZEL, J.J., 1992. Development of bird resistant sunflower. In: Proceedings of the International Sunflower Conference. Paris: International Sunflower Association, pp. 1059-1064.

JAYME, D.G., et al. Quality of silages of sunflower genotypes (Helianthus annuus) confectioners and oil producers. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2007, 59(5), 287-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352007000500028

KNOWLES, P.F., 1978. Morphology and anatomy. In: American Society of Agronomy eds. Sunflower science and technology. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, pp. 55-87.

LAMM, F.R., KHEIRA, A.A.A. and TROOIEN, T.P. Sunflower, soybean, and grain sorghum crop production as affected by dripline depth. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2010, 26(5), 873-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.34952

LOBO, T.F. and GRASSI FILHO, H. Level of sewage sludge for the productivity of sunflower. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2007, 7(3), 16-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27912007000300002

MAHERI-SIS, N., et al. Effect of microwave irradiation on nutritive value of sunflower meal for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2011, 21(2), 126-131.

MARTINS, A.S., et al. Glycerol inclusion levels in corn and sunflower silages. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 2014, 38(5), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000500009

MELLO, R., et al. Sowing dates effects on the phenology, yield and qualitative traits of sunflower hybrids for silage making. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2006, 35(3), 672-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000300007

MOHAMMADABADI, T., CHAJI, M. and TABATABAEI, S. The effect of tannic acid on in vitro gas production and rumen fermentation of sunflower meal. Journal of Animal Veterinary advances. 2010, 9(2), 277-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.277.280

MUSTAFA, T.A.N., HALIL, Y. and ZEYNEP, D.G. Nutritive value of sunflower silages ensiled with corn or alfalfa at different rate. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015, 21, 184-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001320

NOBRE, R.G., GHEYI, H.R., SOARES, F.L.S. and CARDOSO, J.A.F. Sunflower production under saline stress and nitrogen fertilization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 2011, 35, 927-937. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000300027

OLIVEIRA, M.F., CASTIGLIONI, V.B.R. and CARVALHO, C.G.P., 2005 Melhoramento do girassol. In: R.M.V.B.C. LEITE, A.M. BRIGHENTI and C. CASTRO, eds. Girassol no Brasil. Londrina: EMBRAPA, pp. 269-297.

PIVETTA, L.G., et al. Evaluation of sunflower hybrids and the relationship between productive and qualitative parameters. Revista Ciência Agronômica. 2012, 43(3), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300020

PORTO, W.S., et al. Adaptability and stability of sunflower genotypes for the sub-tropical region of Brazil. Ciência Rural. 2009, 39(9), 2452-2459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000207

PORTO, W.S., CARVALHO, C.G.P. and PINTO, R.J.B. Adaptability and stability as selection criteria for sunflower genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2007, 42(4), 491-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007000400006

PRADO, J.M., LACHOS-PEREZ, D., FORSTER-CARNEIRO, T. and ROSTAGNO, M.A. Sub-and supercritical water hydrolysis of agricultural and food industry residues for the production of fermentable sugars: A review. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2016, 98, 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2015.11.004

RIBEIRO, A.C., GUIMARÃES, P.T.G. and ALVAREZ, V.H. Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5a aproximação. Viçosa: Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais, 1999.

RIGON, J.P.G., et al. Agronomic performance and genetic dissimilarity sunflower. Ciência Rural. 2012, 42(11), 1954-1959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012001100008

SABBI, L.B.C., ÂNGELO, A.C. and BOEGER, M.R. Influence of light on morphoanatomical and physiological aspects of the Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) leaves implanted in two areas with different degrees of succession, on the banks of the Iraí Reservoir, Paraná, Brazil. Iheringia. 2010, 65(2), 171-181.

SANTOS, H.G., et al. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 2nd ed. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 2006.

SCHNEITER, A.A. and MILLER, J.F. Description of Sunflower growth stages. Crop Science. 1981, 21, 901-903.

SCOTT, A. and KNOTT, M. Cluster-analysis method for grouping means in analysis of variance. Biometrics. 1974, 30, 507-512.

SILVA, M.E.F., LEMOS, L.T., NUNES, O.C. and CUNHA-QUEDA, A.C. Influence of the composition of the initial mixtures on the chemical composition, physicochemical properties and humic-like substances content of composts. Waste Management. 2014, 34(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.011

SINGH, K. On the asymptotic accuracy of Efron's bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics. 1981, 9(6), 1187-1195.

SMITH, J.S.C., et al. Genetic diversity among US sunflower inbreds and hybrids: Assessing probability of ancestry and potential for use in plant variety protection. Crop Science. 2009, 49(4), 1295-1303. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0432

SPUGNOLI, P., et al. Sustainability of sunflower cultivation for bodiesel production in Tuscany within the EU Renewable Energy Directive. Biosystems Engineering. 2012, 112(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.02.004

STEEL, R.G.D. and TORRIE, J.H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.