Measurements of coherence in eeg signal in brazilian people: a comparison of different consciousness states

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-49454

Keywords:

Coherence, Consciousness states, Electroencephalography.

Abstract

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units require special care and the early diagnosis of the possible outcome of this coma is clinically important. Electroencephalographic signals are collected daily in critically ill patients and can be used to aid in the early diagnosis of neurological pathologies in such patients. Therefore, this study aimed to quantitatively describe the coherence values measured by the EEG signal of Brazilian individuals. The first group with comatose patients (N = 75), favorable (to live) or unfavorable (dying) outcomes, and various etiology. The second group was made by neurologically normal people, named the control group (N = 100). In addition, a number of statistical comparisons were made in order to verify the difference in coherence behavior according to the levels of consciousness. The coherence index of the comatose group is smaller than the control group. Besides, different hospitalization results, living or dying, as well as different etiologies, may be associated with particular values of cerebral coherence. It was observed that the etiology of coma does not influence the measured values of coherence in terms of diagnosis due to brain death, which may become a biomarker of this outcome. Another important consideration was that neurologically healthy patients did not present high values of cerebral coherence at all electrodes, as seen in the temporal region of the brain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANGHINAH, R., et al. EEG alpha band coherence analysis in healthy adults: preliminary results. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2005, 63, 83–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2005000100015

CAVALCANTI, S.P., et al. Electroencephalogram in Intensive Care Unit. International Archives of Medicine. 2016, 8, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3823/1956

CAVINATO, M., et al. Coherence and Consciousness: Study of Fronto-Parietal Gamma Synchrony in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Topography. 2014, 28(4), 570–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0383-5

CITERIO, G., et al. Organ donation in adults: a critical care perspective. Intensive Care Medicine. 2016, 42(3), 305–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4191-5

CORDER, G.W. and FOREMAN, D.I. Nonparametric Statistics: A Step-by-Step Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2014.

DANIEL, W.W. and CROSS, C.L. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 10th ed. New York: Wiley, 2012.

EBERSOLE, J.S. and PEDLEY, T.A. Current Practice of Clinical Electroencephalography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

FREEMAN, W.J. and QUIROGA, R. Q. Imaging Brain Function With EEG. New York: Springer, 2013. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-4984-3

HERMAN, S.T. et al. Consensus Statement on Continuous EEG in Critically Ill Adults and Children, Part I: Indications. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015, 32(2), 87–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000166

HOFMEIJER, J., et al. Burst-suppression with identical bursts: A distinct EEG pattern with poor outcome in postanoxic coma. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014, 125(5), 947–954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.10.017

HUGDAHL, K. Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain. European Review. 2005, 13(2), 119–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000700

KING, J.R. Information sharing in the brain indexes consciousness in noncommunicative patients. Current Biology. 2013, 23(19), 1914–1919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.075

KOSKINEN, M., et al. Propofol anesthesia induces phase synchronization changes in EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2001, 112(2), 386–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00538-1

LEHEMBRE, R., et al. Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: A connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states. Functional Neurology. 2012, 27(1), 41–47.

LEON-CARRION, J., et al. Brain function in the minimally conscious state: A quantitative neurophysiological study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2008, 119(7), 1506–1514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.030

RAMOS, C.D. Characterization of the normal electroencephalogram in wakefulness: elaboration of the database and quantitative analysis [Master’s dissertation]. Federal University of Uberlandia, 2017. Available from: https://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/19571

RAMOS, C.D., et al. Quantitative Analysis of EEG Records in Distinct States of Consciousness: A Case Study on Brazilian Patient. IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2018, 16(7), 1878–1883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tla.2018.8447352

SCHOMER, D.L. and SILVA, F.H. Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.

SITT, J.D., et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain. 2014, 137(8), 2258‑2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu141

SÖRNMO, L. and LAGUNA, P. Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications. 1 ed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2005. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780124375529/bioelectrical-signal-processing-in-cardiac-and-neurological-applications

THATCHER, R.W. An EEG Severity Index of Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry. 2001, 13(1), 77–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.1.77

TONNER, P.H. and BEIN, B. Classic electroencephalographic parameters: median frequency, spectral edge frequency etc. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2006, 20(1), 147–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.008

VAN PUTTEN, M.J.A.M., et al. A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2004, 115(5), 1189–1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.002

VAN PUTTEN, M.J.A.M. The revised brain symmetry index. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2007, 118(11), 2362–2367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.019.

VESPA, P. Continuous EEG monitoring for the detection of seizures in traumatic brain injury, infarction, and intracerebral hemorrhage: To detect and protect. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005, 22(2), 99–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.wnp.0000154919.54202.e0

WANG, K., et al. EEG slow-wave coherence changes in propofol-induced general anesthesia: experiment and theory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2014, 8, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00215

WESTPHAL, G.A., et al. Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva. 2016, 28(3), 220–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20160049

XIN, X., et al. Correlation between the Revised Brain Symmetry Index, an EEG Feature Index, and Short-term Prognosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017, 34(2), 162–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000341

XIN, X., et al. Correlation of continuous electroencephalogram with clinical assessment scores in acute stroke patients. Neuroscience Bulletin. 2012, 28(5), 611–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12264-012-1265-z

ZUBLER, F., et al. Prognostic and diagnostic value of EEG signal coupling measures in coma. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016, 127(8), 2942–2952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.08.022

ZUBLER, F., et al. EEG synchronization measures are early outcome predictors in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2017, 128(4), 635–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.020

Downloads

Published

2021-10-28

How to Cite

DAVI RAMOS, C. and DESTRO-FILHO, J.-B.., 2021. Measurements of coherence in eeg signal in brazilian people: a comparison of different consciousness states. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 37, pp. e37065. [Accessed14 August 2022]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-49454. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/49454.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences