Violation of human rights due to restrictions and virtual bans by private platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-50.1.2022.66225.277-296Keywords:
Virtual ban, Private platforms, Freedom of expression, Digital oligopoliesAbstract
This work aims to analyze the power that the three internet giants (Facebook, Twitter and Google) have to control the right to communication of their users, limiting their freedom of expression, mainly through the exclusion of accounts that violate internal guidelines. of these platforms. The main question is whether the CEO's of these companies can make such tough decisions, which are capable of restricting one of the pillars of the democratic system, based solely on their private policies, without following any laws? To try to reach an answer, the banning of former US President Donald Trump and the opinions of various authorities on this case will be analyzed. For that, we will base ourselves on a documentary research. It is concluded, therefore, that a decision that is taken based on ideological imprints, although they rejoice and satisfy a social portion, in fact, when analyzing its essence, one perceives the affront and withdrawal and discard of the guarantee of rights for the society as a whole.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.