The equality of the different being from the analysis of the OC-24/17

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n2a2021-52899

Keywords:

LGBTI, Human Rights, OC 24/17, homo-affectivity

Abstract

The present jurisprudence comment arose from the analysis of the Advisory Opinion OC 24/17 that was delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on its interpretation regarding the themes “gender identity, equality and non-discrimination of same-sex couples, and what state obligations in relation to name change, gender identity, and rights derived from a bond between same-sex couples” on the basis of the American Convention on Human Rights. Thus, an analysis of the arguments used was carried out and, consequently, argumentative suggestions were made with the objective of provoking the reader to perceive new critical perspectives to use as arguments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juliana Pilla, UniRitter – Laureate International Universities

Pós-graduada em direito do trabalho e previdenciário pela Uniritter. Pós-graduanda em Direito Homoafetivo e de Gênero pela Unisanta – Universidade Santa Cecília.  Pós-Graduanda em benefícios e práticas previdenciárias pela Verbo Jurídico. Pós-graduanda em Comunicação e Marketing pela Descomplica. Graduada em Direito pela Uniritter em 2015/2. Advogada.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-17

How to Cite

Pilla, J. (2022). The equality of the different being from the analysis of the OC-24/17. Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 49(2), 602–612. https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n2a2021-52899

Issue

Vol. 49 No. 2 (2021): Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Section

Jurisprudence Analysis

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 
FREE ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHTS - By submitting the article on the website, the main author and other co-actors, if any, authorize(s) the Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia to publish the article of their authorship. Consequently, through submission, the author and his co-authors, if any, freely assign copyright to the article, reserving only the rights to intellectual property. He/They further declare(s) that the ideas and concepts issued therein are entirely his/their responsibility, as well as expressing agreement with the graphic corrections that may be made.