Penhora Online na Execução Civil

Medida Excepcional ou Preferencial?

Authors

  • Carlos José Cordeiro UFU
  • Josiane Araújo Gomes UFU

Keywords:

distrainment online, civil execution, procedural effectiveness, preferential measure

Abstract

The present objective study to discourse on the distrainment online of values, innovation brought for the Law nº 11,382, of 07/12/2006, that it added art. 655-A to the Code of Processo Civil (CPC). Such instrument takes care of to the principles of the procedural celeridade and the economy, providing to the effective satisfaction of the right in the processing of the civil executions. But its use still is center of questionings, therefore it has who only defends that the distrainment online possesss bonanza character, being able to be required after depleted all the ways of if finding other goods of the executed one. Such agreement, as it will be demonstrated, is not supported in face of the forecast of art. 655, interpolated proposition I, of the CPC, that included the deposit or application in financial institution in first place in the legal order of preference for distrainment, beyond the distrainment online to consist in a simple, efficient and proportional procedure
of efectivation of the jurisdictional guardianship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Josiane Araújo Gomes, UFU

Graduanda em Direito pela UFU

Published

2010-06-24

How to Cite

Cordeiro, C. J., & Gomes, J. A. (2010). Penhora Online na Execução Civil: Medida Excepcional ou Preferencial?. Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 37. Retrieved from https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistafadir/article/view/18468