Reflexões Dogmáticas sobre a Teoria da Tipicidade Conglobante

Authors

  • Alamiro Velludo Salvador Netto USP

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Criminal dogmatic, Theory of the criminal offense, Vagueness doctrine, Conglobant vagueness doctrine

Abstract

This article intends to analyze and present a critical thinking about the basis of the Conglobant Vagueness
Theory. There are not many writings on the subject, which, while difficult the obtaining of specific works, one the other side allows a full and open discussion with regard to its assertions. It is tried, therefore, to understand the structure of the elements of the theory of the criminal offense in accordance with the thought of EUGENIO RAÚL ZAFFARONI. Moreover, brings up a comparison with other forms of thinking the conceptual development of criminal offense theory, always aiming to improve the tools at disposal of the criminal-legal dogmatic in the resolution of concrete cases. More than conclusions, questions and occasional postulations are made in order to disseminate the theory and, at the same time, criticize it and academically enjoy what it has that fits and is most appropriate to our contemporary criminal reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-23

How to Cite

Salvador Netto, A. V. (2010). Reflexões Dogmáticas sobre a Teoria da Tipicidade Conglobante. Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 36. Retrieved from https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/revistafadir/article/view/18443

Issue

Vol. 36 (2008): Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Section

Articles

License 

 
FREE ASSIGNMENT OF COPYRIGHTS - By submitting the article on the website, the main author and other co-actors, if any, authorize(s) the Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia to publish the article of their authorship. Consequently, through submission, the author and his co-authors, if any, freely assign copyright to the article, reserving only the rights to intellectual property. He/They further declare(s) that the ideas and concepts issued therein are entirely his/their responsibility, as well as expressing agreement with the graphic corrections that may be made.