Impact of occlusal schemes on prognosis of conventional complete dentures in patients with severely resorbed alveolar ridges

Gabriela Mayara Oliveira Nascimento; Wender Batista de Souza; Germana de Villa Camargos; Maira Foresti Vieira Munhoz; Eduardo Henrique da Silva; André Gustavo Paleari

doi:10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-72612

Autores

Gabriela Mayara Oliveira Nascimento Private Practice https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-821X
Wender Batista de Souza Universidade Federal de Uberlândia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-4159
Germana de Villa Camargos Universidade Federal de Uberlândia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-7048
Maira Foresti Vieira Munhoz Universidade Federal de Alfenas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-1699
Eduardo Henrique da Silva https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-1570
André Gustavo Paleari Universidade de Franca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-72612

Palavras-chave:

Bone Resorption, Complete denture, Dental occlusion, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of life.

Resumo

Bilateral Balanced Occlusion (BBO) and Canine Guidance (CG) are occlusal schemes that have been successfully used in complete dentures (CDs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of CG compared to BBO on satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and masticatory performance in CDs wearers with severe resorbed alveolar ridge by means of a crossover trial. Sixteen edentulous patients with severe resorbed ridges were treated with new maxillary and mandibular CDs. After adaptation period, they were randomly divided into two groups according to a sequence of occlusal schemes: BBO for 30 days followed by CG for 30 days or, CG for 30 days followed by BBO for 30 days. Patient satisfaction with their dentures, OHRQoL and masticatory performance were assessed immediately 30 days after of using each occlusal scheme. The results of satisfaction and quality of life were using Wilcoxon test, and data regarding masticatory performance were analyzed through paired t-test (α = .05). The occlusal scheme used in complete dentures had no significant influence on general patient satisfaction (p = 0.06), overall quality of life (p = 0.09), or masticatory performance of patients (p = 0.182). Both BBO and CG can be considered as suitable for oral rehabilitation with CDs in patients with severe resorbed alveolar ridges. However, CG may be considered as a scheme of choice by clinicians due to its greater simplicity and shorter execution time.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ALLEN, P.F., MCMILLAN, A.S. A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2003, 69(10), 662.

BORGES, M. H. R. et al. Clinical performance of and patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures with different occlusal schemes: A systematic review of systematic reviews. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2023, 130(3),341-350.

CARLSSON, G. E. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2009, 53(1), 3–10.

CAWOOD, J. I. and HOWELL, R. A. A classification of the edentulous jaws. International Journal of Oral & |Maxillofacial Surgery. 1988, 17, 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80047-X

ČELEBIĆ, A., KNEZOVIĆ-ZLATARIĆ, D. A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of Dentistry. 2003, 31(7), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00094-0

DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, N. M et al. Masticatory performance of complete denture wearers after using two adhesives: a crossover randomized clinical trial. The Journal os Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014, 112(5), 1182–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.004

DE SOUZA, R. F. et al. Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjects. Journal of Oral Rehabilitantion. 2007, 34(11), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01749.x

DE SOUZA, R. F., et al. Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. Gerontology. 2012, 29(2), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00417.x

DE SOUZA, R.F., et al. Exploratory factor analysis of the Brazilian OHIP for edentulous subjects. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2010, 37(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02043.x

DEMERS, M., et al. Indicators of masticatory performance among elderly complete denture wearers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996, 75(2), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90098-0

ELLIS, J. S., PELEKIS, N. D. and THOMASON JM. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2007, 16(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.x

FARIAS-NETO, A., MESTRINER-JUNIOR, W. and CARREIRO, A. F. P. Masticatory efficiency in denture wearers with bilateral balanced occlusion and canine guidance. Brazilian dental Journal. 2010, 21(2),165-169. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000200013

GJENGEDAL, H. et al. Self-reported oral health and denture satisfaction in partially and completely edentulous patients. The International Journal of Prostodontics. 2011, 24(1), 9-15.

GOLDSTEIN, G., KAPADIA, Y., CAMPBELL, S. Complete Denture Occlusion: Best Evidence Consensus Statement. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021, 30(S1), 72–77.

GRUBWIESER G, et al. Quantitative analysis of masseter and temporalis EMGs: a comparison of anterior guided versus balanced occlusal concepts in patients wearing complete dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999, 26(9), 731-736. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00438.x

HASSEL, A. J. et al. Correlations between self-ratings of denture function and oral health-related quality of life in different age groups. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2007, 20(3), 242-244.

HUUMONEN, S. et al. Residual ridge resorption, lower denture stability and subjective complaints among edentulous individuals. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2012, 39(5):384-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02284.x

KAPUR, K. K. and SOMAN, S. D. Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2004, 92(2), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.026

KAWAI, Y. et al. A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete dentures. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2017, 61(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.003

KIMOTO S, et al. Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2006, 19(1), 103-109.

LEKHOLM, U. and ZARB, G.A. Patient selection and preparation. In: BRANEMARK, P. I., ZARB, G. A., ALBREKTSSON, T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL:Quintessence, 1985.

LELES, C. R. et al. Impact of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects’ preferences for prosthodontic rehabilitation with implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019, 30(3), 285-292.

LELES, C. R. et al. Kinesiographic study of mandibular movements during functional adaptation to complete dentures. Jounal of Applied Oral Science. 2003, 11(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572003000400007

LEMOS, C. A. A. et al. Bilateral balanced occlusion compared to other occlusal schemes in complete dentures: A systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2018, 45(4), 344-354.

MARCELLO-MACHADO, R.M. et al. How does mandibular boné atrophy influence the masticatory function, OHRQoL and satisfaction in overdenture wearers? Clinical results until 1-year post-loading. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2017, 44(11), 850-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12546

MATSUMARU, Y. Influence of mandibular residual ridge resorption on objective masticatory measures of lingualized and fully bilateral balanced denture articulation. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2010, 54(3), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.008

MCGARRY, T. J. et al. Classification system for complete edentulism. The American College of Prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999, 8(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00005.x

MORADPOOR, H. et al. Patient satisfaction with occlusal scheme of conventional complete dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2020, 47(4), 494-500.

MUNIZ, V.R.C., et al. Functional performance, nutritional statusand level of physical activity of elderly. Bioscience Journal. 2022, 38, e38044. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-55177

PALEARI AG, et al. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2012, 39(8), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.x

PERO, A. C. et al. Masticatory function in complete denture wearers varying degree of mandibular bone resorption and occlusion concept: canine-guided occlusion versus bilateral balanced occlusion in a cross-over trial. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2019, 63(4), 421-427.

PEROZ, I.et al. Comparison between balanced occlusion and canine guidance in complete denture wearers- a clinical, randomized trial. Quintessence International. 2003, 34(8), 607-612.

PHOENIX, R.D., and ENGELMEIER, R.L. Lingualized occlusion revisited. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2010, 104(5), 342-346.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60153-9

REHMANN, P. et al. Influence of the occlusal concept of complete dentures on patient satisfaction in the initial phase after fitting: bilateral balanced occlusion vs canine guidance. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008, 21(1),60-61.

SCHIERZ, O. and REISSMANN, D. Influence of guidance concept in complete dentures on oral health related quality of life- canine guidance vs. bilateral balanced occlusion. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2016, 60(4), 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.005

SCHNEIDER, G. and SENGER, B. Coffee beans as a natural test food for the evaluation of the masticatory efficiency. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001, 28(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00699.x

SRINIVASAN, R. et al. Differences in quality of life and patient satisfaction between complete denture occlusion schemes: A parallel randomized control trial. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023, 129(5), 748-753.

STREICHER, M., et al. Determinants of Incident Malnutrition in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A MaNuEL Multicohort Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018, 66(12), 2335-2343. http://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15553

TALLGREN A. Positional changes of complete dentures. A 7-year longitudional study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1969; 27(5), 539-561.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356908994049

TALLGREN, A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1972, 27, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00158-6

WAYLER, A. H., and CHAUNCEY, H. H. Impact of complete dentures and impaired natural dentition on masticatory performance and food choice in healthy aging men. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1983, 49(3), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90289-5

WICAL, K.E. and SWOOPE, C.C. Studies of residual ridge resorption. Part I. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1974, 32(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90093-6

ZARB, G.A., et al. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2003.