The influence of different culture media on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation

Autores

  • Leonardo Quintana Soares Lopes Universidade Federal de Santa Maria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-5216
  • Pedro Henrique Fortes Guerim Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Roberto Christ Vianna Santos Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Flavia Kolling Marquezan Universidade Franciscana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1505-2447
  • Patrícia Kolling Marquezan Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-68631

Palavras-chave:

Adhesion, Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, In vitro techniques.

Resumo

Microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus are frequently isolated in samples of urinary, blood, intestinal, and respiratory infections, among others. These bacteria are also associated with microbial biofilm formation. E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus biofilm infections are particularly hard to manage and often associated with nosocomial problems. This study investigated the influence of different culture media on E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus biofilm formation. Bacterial performance was evaluated in brain heart infusion broth, Mueller-Hinton broth, or tryptic soy broth, with or without supplementing with different glucose levels (1-5%). The study quantified biofilm biomass and the count of viable biofilm colonies. This is the first study that compares the biofilm formation of E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in polystyrene using different culture media and with different glucose concentrations. The most robust growth of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus occurred in brain heart infusion broth supplemented with 5% glucose, Mueller-Hinton broth without glucose, and tryptic soy broth with 2% glucose, respectively. Our data demonstrate that behavioral and morphological characteristics of each bacterium require a specific broth to enhance the growth of these microorganisms. These findings will contribute to future tests for therapeutic alternatives with anti-biofilm potential.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AZAM, M.W. and KHAN, A.U. Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discovery Today. 2019, 24(1), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.07.003

BAE, Y.M., SONG, H. and LEE, S.Y. Salt, glucose, glycine, and sucrose protect Escherichia coli O157:H7 against acid treatment in laboratory media. Food Microbiology. 2021, 100, 103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103854

BROWN, C.L., et al. Colicin-like bacteriocins as novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of chronic biofilm-mediated infection. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2012, 40(6), 1549–1552. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20120241

FERNÁNDEZ-BARAT, L., et al. Assessment of in vivo versus in vitro biofilm formation of clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from endotracheal tubes. Scientific Reports. 2018, 8(1), 11906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30494-7

FERNÁNDEZ-GUTIERREZ, D., et al. Biovalorization of glucose in four culture media and effect of the nitrogen source on fermentative alcohols production by Escherichia coli. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom). 2020, 41(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1494751

HE, L., LE, K.Y., et al. Resistance to leukocytes ties benefits of quorum sensing dysfunctionality to biofilm infection. Nature Microbiology. 2019, 4(7), 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0413-x

KEREN, I., et al. Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004, 186(24), 8172–8180. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.24.8172-8180.2004

LADE, H., et al. Biofilm formation by staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates is differentially affected by glucose and sodium chloride supplemented culture media. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019, 8(11), 1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111853

LESHO, E.P. and LAGUIO-VILA, M. The Slow-Motion Catastrophe of Antimicrobial Resistance and Practical Interventions for All Prescribers. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019. 94(6), 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.11.005

LEWIS, K. Persister cells and the paradox of chronic infections. Microbe. 2010, 5(10), 429–437. https://www.doi.org/10.1128/microbe.5.429.1

LOPES, L.Q.S., et al. Characterisation and anti-biofilm activity of glycerol monolaurate nanocapsules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2019, 130, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.03.007

LOZANO, C., et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: One step closer to a standardized method. Antibiotics. 2020, 9(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120880

LUO, Z., et al. Reduced Growth of Staphylococcus aureus Under High Glucose Conditions Is Associated With Decreased Pentaglycine Expression. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020, 11, 537290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.537290

MANZO, G., et al. Impacts of Metabolism and Organic Acids on Cell Wall Composition and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility to Membrane Active Antimicrobials. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2021, 7(8), 2310–2323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00002

MIRZAEI, R., et al. Bacterial biofilm in colorectal cancer: What is the real mechanism of action? Microbial Pathogenesis. 2020, 142, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104052

MULANI, M.S., et al. Emerging strategies to combat ESKAPE pathogens in the era of antimicrobial resistance: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019, 10, 539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00539

REGASSA, L.B., NOVICK, R.P. and BETLEY, M.J. Glucose and nonmaintained pH decrease expression of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. Infection and Immunity. 1992, 60(8), 3381–3388. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.60.8.3381-3388.1992

SÁNCHEZ-CLEMENTE, R., et al. Carbon source influence on extracellular ph changes along bacterial cell-growth. Genes. 2020, 11(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111292

SANDASI, M., LEONARD, C.M. and VILJOEN, A.M. The in vitro antibiofilm activity of selected culinary herbs and medicinal plants against Listeria monocytogenes. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2010, 50(1), 30-35 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02747.x

SANDBERG, M., et al. Automating a 96-well microtiter plate model for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: an approach to screening of natural antimicrobial compounds. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2008, 32(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.04.022

SMITH, A., et al. The culture environment influences both gene regulation and phenotypic heterogeneity in Escherichia coli. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018, 9, 1739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01739

TASSE, J., et al. Association between biofilm formation phenotype and clonal lineage in Staphylococcus aureus strains from bone and joint infections. PLoS ONE. 2018, 13(8), e0200064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200064

WIJESINGHE, G., et al. Influence of Laboratory Culture Media on in vitro Growth, Adhesion, and Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Medical Principles and Practice. 2019, 28(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494757

YEWALE, V.N. Antimicrobial resistance - A ticking bomb! Indian Pediatrics. 2014, 51(3), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0374-3

YU, L., et al. A novel repressor of the ica locus discovered in clinically isolated super-biofilm-elaborating staphylococcus aureus. mBio. 2017, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02282-16

Downloads

Publicado

2023-08-18

Como Citar

LOPES, L.Q.S., HENRIQUE FORTES GUERIM, P., CHRIST VIANNA SANTOS, R., MARQUEZAN, F.K. e KOLLING MARQUEZAN, P., 2023. The influence of different culture media on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 39, pp. e39096. [Accessed23 novembro 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-68631. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/68631.

Edição

Seção

Ciências Biológicas