A multicenter and epidemiological study of patterns and treatment strategies for mandibular condyle fractures

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-67583

Palavras-chave:

Complications, Condylar fractures, Maxillofacial injuries, Treatment.

Resumo

To evaluate retrospectively the epidemiological characteristics of the prevalence, type and treatment modalities of the condylar mandibular fractures. Data of all patients who underwent surgical or nonsurgical management for condyle mandibular fracture were collected. The study was conducted to assess the trauma etiology, age group, gender, treatment method, anatomic distribution of injury and complications by reviewing patients’ records. There were 139 patients with 171 mandibular condylar fractures. Among these patients, 85% were men, with an overall male-to-female ratio of 5.6:1. The highest occurrence of trauma was in the 21-30 years age group. The most frequently observed etiology was motorcycle traffic accidents and the subcondylar region was the most common location with 109 fractures. There was statistically significant difference between treatments (p < 0,001). In the nonsurgical treatment group, the prevalence of complications was observed compared to the surgical group (p < 0.001). The predominant complications were: mouth opening limitation, mandibular deviation, malocclusion, temporomandibular disorder, paresthesia and facial paralysis. Considering the limitations of this study, subcondylar fractures were the most frequent, especially in men aged 21-30 years, and the surgical treatment showed the fewest complications.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AFROOZ, P.N., et al. The Epidemiology of Mandibular Fractures in the United States, Part 1: A Review of 13,142 Cases from the US National Trauma Data Bank. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015, 73(12), 2361-2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.032

AHMAD, M., et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endod. 2009, 107(6):844-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.023

AMARISTA ROJAS, F.J., et al. The epidemiology of mandibular fractures in Caracas, Venezuela: Incidence and its combination patterns. Dental Traumatology. 2017, 33(6), 427-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12370

BARHAM, H.P., et al. The Relationship of the Facial Nerve to the Condylar Process: A Cadaveric Study with Implications for Open Reduction Internal Fixation. International Journal of Otolaryngology. 2015, 715126. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/715126

BLUMER, M., et al. Outcome of Surgically Treated Fractures of the Condylar Process by an Endoscopic Assisted Transoral Approach. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019, 77(1), 133 e1- e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.013

BONAVOLONTA, P., et al. The epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Italy: The experience of a single tertiary center with 1720 patients. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017, 45(8), 1319-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.011

BOFFANO, P., et al. Current opinions on surgical treatment of fractures of the condylar head. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2014, 7(2), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1371772

CABRAL, L.C., et al. Changes in mandibular and articular dynamics associated with surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2020, 129(4), 311-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.010

CHAURASIA, A., et al. Prevalence of mandibular fracture in patients visiting a tertiary dental care hospital in North India. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018, 9(2), 123-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_8_18

CHOI, K.Y., et al. Current concepts in the mandibular condyle fracture management part I: overview of condylar fracture. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2012, 39(4), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.291

CHRCANOVIC, B.R. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015, 44(2), 158-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.024

DAMACENA, G.N., et al. Alcohol abuse and involvement in traffic accidents in the Brazilian population, 2013. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva. 2016, 21(12), 3777-86. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152112.25692015

ELLIS, E, 3rd. Discussion: Which Factors Are Associated with Open Reduction of Adult Mandibular Condylar Injuries? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016, 137(6), 1822-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002154

FERRER, U.M.J., et al. Epidemiological Study of the Socioeconomic Impact of Mandible Fractures in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital: Review of the Literature. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2019, 18(2), 217-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1148-6

HAKIM, T.A., et al. Unilateral Subcondylar and Condylar Neck Fractures: Randomized Clinical Study. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018, 8(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_166_17

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Características demográficas da população. Minas Gerais / Paraíba: IBGE, 2022. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/panorama

JENSEN, T., et al. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures by an intraoral approach: a long-term follow-up study of 15 patients. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2006, 64(12), 1771-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.069

KRUGER, E., et al. Fractures of the mandible and maxilla: A 10-year analysis. The Australasian Medical Journal. 2016, 9(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2015.2570

LANDES, C.A., et al. Prospective evaluation of closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated mandibular condyle fractures versus open reposition and rigid fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures in children. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008, 66(6), 1184-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.667

LIU, Y., et al. Open versus closed treatment of unilateral moderately displaced mandibular condylar fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2013, 116(2), 169-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.023

MIJITI, A., et al. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures treated at a university hospital, Xinjiang, China: A 5-year retrospective study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014, 42(3), 227-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.005

MITTERMILLER, P.A., et al. The Comprehensive AO CMF Classification System for Mandibular Fractures: A Multicenter Validation Study. Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. 2019, 12(4), 254-65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1677459

MONNAZZI, M.S., et al. Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. A 20-year review. Dental Traumatology. 2017, 33(3), 175-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12326

MONTOVANI, J.C., et al. Etiology and incidence facial fractures in children and adults. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia. 2006, 72(2), 235-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30061-6

MOURA, L.B., et al. Double unilateral, bilateral, and multiple mandibular fractures: an observational study. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018, 22(3), 315-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0713-y

MUNANTE-CARDENAS, J.L., et al. Etiology, treatment, and complications of mandibular fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2015, 26(3), 611-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001273

NEFF, A., et al. The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Condylar Process Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2014, 7(Suppl 1), S044-58. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1389559

NIEZEN, E.T., et al. Fractures of the mandibular condyle: A comparison of patients, fractures and treatment characteristics between Groningen (The Netherlands) and Dresden (Germany). Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018, 46(10), 1719-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.07.010

PALMIERI, C., et al. Mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1999, 57(7), 764-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90810-8

PATEL, N., et al. A Detailed Analysis of Mandibular Angle Fractures: Epidemiology, Patterns, Treatments, and Outcomes. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016, 74(9), 1792-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.05.002

POWERS, D.B. Classification of Mandibular Condylar Fractures. Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America. 2017, 25(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2016.11.001

RASTOGI, S., et al. Fracture of mandibular condyle-to open or not to open: an attempt to settle the controversy. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2015, 119(6), 608-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.012

RIOS, P.A.A., et al. Traffic accidents among drivers: incidence and differences between motorcyclists and car drivers in population-based study. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2019, 22, e190054.

Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012. Power calculator for binary outcome superiority trial. [Online] Available from: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/binary-superiority

SAWAZAKI, R., et al. Incidence and patterns of mandibular condyle fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010, 68(6),1252-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.064

SILVA, A.P., et al. Oral-motor and electromyographic characterization of patients submitted to open a nd closed reductions of mandibular condyle fracture. Codas. 2016, 28(5), 558-66. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015186

THAPA, S., et al. Epidemiology of Surgically Managed Mandibular Condylar Fractures at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Urban Southwest China. The open dentistry journal. 2017, 11, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010294

VERMA, S., et al. Update on patterns of mandibular fracture in Tasmania, Australia. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015, 53(1), 74-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.10.003

VON ELM, E., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of internal medicine. 2007, 4(10), e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

WIDMARK, G., et al. Open reduction of subcondylar fractures. A study of functional rehabilitation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1996, 25(2), 107-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80052-X

ZHANG, X., et al. A comparative study of the treatment of unilateral fractured and dislocated mandibular condyles in the rabbit. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1991, 49(11), 1181-1190.

ZHOU, H., et al. Mechanics in the Production of Mandibular Fractures: A Clinical, Retrospective Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 2016, 11(2), e0149553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149553

Downloads

Publicado

2024-05-09

Como Citar

CARDOSO CABRAL, L., JÚNIOR, E.C.S., CABRAL, B.C., NETO, J.P. da S., FURTADO, L.M. e JÚNIOR, P.C.S., 2024. A multicenter and epidemiological study of patterns and treatment strategies for mandibular condyle fractures. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 40, pp. e40022. [Accessed22 dezembro 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v40n0a2024-67583. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/67583.

Edição

Seção

Ciências da Saúde