Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon

Autores

  • Danieli Aline Cigolini Ruzza Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso
  • Rosimeire Barboza Bispo Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-1084
  • Eliane Cristina Moreno de Pedri Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso Carlos Alberto Reyes Maldonado - UNEMAT https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-581X
  • Kellen Coutinho Martins Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso
  • Kelli Évelin Müller Zortéa Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-6130
  • Sérgio Alessandro Machado Souza Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso
  • Telma Nair Santana Pereira Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-7576
  • Ana Aparecida Bandini Rossi Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719

Palavras-chave:

Colorimetric tests, Genipap tree, Pollen grains.

Resumo

Genipa americana L., commonly known as genipap, belongs to the Rubiaceae family. This study aimed to describe the pollen morphology of the species, evaluate its meiotic behavior and pollen viability, and provide information to help the maintenance and conservation of the species in its natural habitat. Flower buds were collected from 20 individuals in Alta Floresta and Matupá municipalities, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Pollen morphology was characterized using acetolysis and compared to existing literature. Meiotic and post-meiotic phases were analyzed using 2% acetocarmine stain, and pollen viability was estimated using Sudan IV, Alexander's stain, Lugol's solution (1%), and 2% acetocarmine stain. G. americana has medium-sized, 3-colporate pollen with reticulated exine and few meiotic irregularities. Acetocarmine stain showed the highest mean percentage of pollen viability (97.96%). Stain tests revealed significant differences, indicating high pollen viability and meiotic regularity. However, conservation and recovery of degraded areas are still necessary as there is no guarantee of successful reproduction due to factors associated with fragmentation, genetic drift, reduced gene flow, and inbreeding.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AGUIAR, T.V. et al. Anati quanti: software de análises quantitativas para estudos em anatomia vegetal. Planta Daninha. 2007, 25(4), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000400001

AGUILAR, R. et al. Habitat fragmentation reduces plant progeny quality: a global synthesis. Ecology letters. 2019, 22(7), 1163-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13272

ALEXANDER, M.P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technology. 1969, 44, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520296909063335

ALOTAIBI, S.S. et al. Pollen molecular biology: Applications in the forensic palynology and future prospects: A review. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2020, 27(5), 1185-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.019

ANDRADE BORTOLETI, K.C. et al., 2018 Etnobotanical Retrospective and Features of the Multipurpose Plant Genipa americana L. (Rubiaceae). In: MARTINEZ J. L. et al., 1ed. Ethnobotany: Application of Medicinal Plants, CRC Press, p. 69-89.

ARRUDA, S.A. et al. Physiological potential of jenipapo seeds stored in different packages. Bioscience Journal. 2018, 34(2), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452

BARTH, O.M. Catálogo sistemático dos polens das plantas arbóreas do Brasil Meridional – Glossário Palinológico. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1965, 63, 133-162. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n2a2018-38452

CAIRES, S.C. and BARCELOS, D. Colapso das abelhas: Possíveis causas e consequências do seu desaparecimento na natureza. Acta Apicola Brasilica. 2017, 5(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.18378/aab.v5i1.5294

CARDOSO, D.R. et al. Potencial tecnológico e composição de Farinha de Jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) obtida por secagem em convecção. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020, 6(6), 33448-33467. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n6-050

COSTA, A., GALVÃO, A. and GONÇALVES DA SILVA, L. Mata Atlântica Brasileira: Análise do efeito de borda em fragmentos florestais remanescentes de um hotspot para conservação da biodiversidade. Revista de Geografia, Meio Ambiente e Ensino. 2019, 10(1), 112-123. Available from: http://www.fecilcam.br/revista/index.php/geomae/article/viewFile/415/pdf_342

CRUZ, C.D. Genes Software: extended and integrated with the R, Matlab and Selegen. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 2016, 38(4), 547-552. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i4.32629

DAFNI, A. Pollination ecology: a practical approach. 1ª ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247203153_Pollination_Ecology_A_Practical_Approach

DARLINGTON, C.D. Evolution of genetics systems. 2ª. ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958.

DE ARAÚJO, T.M.S. and BASTOS, F.H. Corredores ecológicos e conservação da biodiversidade: aportes teóricos e conceituais. Revista da Casa da Geografia de Sobral (RCGS). 2019, 21(2), 716-729. https://doi.org/10.35701/rcgs.v21n2.575

DEPRÁ, M. S. and GAGLIANONE, M.C. Interações entre plantas e polinizadores sob uma perspectiva temporal. Oecologia Australis. 2018, 22(1), 1-16. Available from: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/oa/article/viewFile/10537/10122

DUTRA, F.V. et al. Pollen morphology of Rubiaceae from Cerrado forest fragments: Pollen unit, polarity and diversity of the types of apertures. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2020, 282, 104297-104314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104297

EINHARDT, P.M., CORREA, E.R. and RASEIRA, M.C.B. Comparação entre métodos para testar a viabilidade de pólen de pessegueiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura. 2006, 28(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452006000100004

ERDTMAN, G. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy Angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist e Wiksell, 1952.

ERDTMAN, G. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. III. Morina L. With an addition on pollenmorphological terminology. Svensk Botanisk Tidskr. 1945, 39, 279-285.

FURINI, T. et al. Estimativa de viabilidade polínica da Chenopodium ambrosioides L. através de métodos colorimétricos. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020 6(7), 42386-42391. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n7-014

GARCIA, A.S. et al. High rates of pollen and seed flow in Hymenaea stigonocarpa on a highly fragmented savanna landscape in Brazil. New Forests. 2019, 50(6), 991-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09710-3

GOMES, M. Genipa in Flora do Brasil 2020. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 2020. Available from: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/reflora/floradobrasil/FB14045.

GUO, X. et al. Pollen morphology of Leptodermis (Rubiaceae) and its systematic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2020, 306(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01641-3

HISTER, C.A.L. and TEDESCO, S.B. Estimation of pollen viability of strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum Sabine) through distinct staining methods. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais. 2016, 18(1), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084X/15_081

JESUS, L.D.G.A. et al. Eficiência de testes colorimétricos para determinação da viabilidade do pólen em acessos de feijão-fava (Phaseolus lunatus L). Revista Brasileira de Agropecuária Sustentável. 2018, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21206/rbas.v8i1.430

LAURENCE, A.R. and BRYANT, V.M. Forensic palynology and the search for geolocation: Factors for analysis and the Baby Doe case. Forensic science international. 2019, 302, 109903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109903

LOVE, R.M. Varietal differences in meiotic chromosomes behavior of Brazilian wheats. Agronomy Journal. 1951, 43, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300020005x

MARSDEN, C. et al. How agroforestry systems influence soil fauna and their functions-a review. Plant and Soil. 2020, 453(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04322-4

MARTINS, K.C. Morfologia polínica: aplicações, estudos e metodologias. Rio de Janeiro: CBJE, 2010.

MATOS, V.P.V.D. et al. Forest fragmentation and impacts on the bird community. Revista Árvore. 2018, 42(3), e420309. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882018000300009

MELÉNDEZ, V. et al. Polinización y polinizadores amenazados en desaparecer. Bioagrociencias. 2020, 13(2), 109-119. Available from: https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/BAC/article/viewFile/3558/1535

MORAES, M.A. et al. Long‐distance pollen and seed dispersal and inbreeding depression in Hymenaea stigonocarpa (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) in the Brazilian savannah. Ecology and Evolution. 2018, 8(16), 7800-7816. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4253

MOURA, S.M.S., SOUSA, S.R.S. and CONDE JÚNIOR, A.M. Genipa americana L.: prospecção tecnológica. Jornal Interdiscipllinar de Biociências. 2016, 1(2), 31-35. Available from: https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/jibi/article/view/5174/3109

MUNHOZ, M. et al. Viabilidade polínica de Carica papaya L.: uma comparação metodológica. Revista Brasileira de Botânica. 2008, 31(2), 209-214. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbb/v31n2/v31n2a03

PUNT, W. et al. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 2007, 143, 1-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008

ROSA, J.M. et al. Desaparecimento de abelhas polinizadoras nos sistemas naturais e agrícolas: Existe uma explicação?. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias. 2019, 18(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711812019154

RUZZA, D.A.C. et al. Etnobotânica do jenipapo (Genipa americana L., Rubiaceae) entre agricultores no município de Carlinda, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2020, 6(8), 61161-61184. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n8-509

SANTOS, P.Z.F. et al. Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscapes? A meta-analysis for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Forest ecology and management. 2019, 433, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.064

SANTOS, R.A. and AÑEZ, R.B.D.S. Aspectos da biologia floral de Curatella americana l.(Dilleniaceae), em um fragmento de cerrado antropizado, Tangará da Serra, MT. FLOVET-Boletim do Grupo de Pesquisa da Flora, Vegetação e Etnobotânica. 2018, 1(10), 22-36. Available from: https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/flovet/article/view/7713

SOUZA, F.P. and VIEIRA, K.P.M. Desenvolvimento e caracterização de farinha obtida a partir da casca do jenipapo (Genipa americana L.). Revista Brasileira de Tecnologia Agroindustrial. 2020, 14(1), 3022-3045. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3895/rbta.v14n1.9173

SOUZA, R. R. Melissopalynology in Brazil: a map of pollen types and published productions between 2005 and 2017. Palynology. 2018, 43(4), 690-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1542355

SPOLADORE, J. et al. Genetic conservation of small populations of the endemic tree Swartzia glazioviana (Taub.) Glaz. (Leguminosae) in the Atlantic Forest. Conservation Genetics. 2017, 18(5), 1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0962-6

VIJAY, V. et al. The Impacts of Oil Palm on Recent Deforestation and Biodiversity Loss. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11(7), e0159668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159668

ZEMP, D.C. et al. Deforestation effects on Amazon forest resilience. Geophysical Research Letters. 2017, 44(12), 6182-6190. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072955

ZHAO, K. et al. Palynological evidence of late Holocene paleo‐monsoon in eastern Pamir. Geophysical Research Letters. 2019, 46(16), 10015-10023. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082941

Downloads

Publicado

2023-05-05

Como Citar

RUZZA, D.A.C., BISPO, R.B., MORENO DE PEDRI, E.C., MARTINS, K.C., ZORTÉA, K. Évelin M., SOUZA, S.A.M., PEREIRA, T.N.S. e ROSSI, A.A.B., 2023. Palynology and meiotic behavior of Genipa americana L., a species native to the Amazon. Bioscience Journal [online], vol. 39, pp. e39070. [Accessed23 dezembro 2024]. DOI 10.14393/BJ-v39n0a2023-62719. Available from: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/62719.

Edição

Seção

Ciências Biológicas