Conceptual anachronism: the sin of intellectual historian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/artc-v25-n46-2023-71194Keywords:
Intellectual History, conceptual anachronism, criticism of contextualismAbstract
Conceptual anachronisms has been always considered one of the worst sins by an intellectual historian. The will to discover how the meaning of the fundamental concepts of political and social discourse was modified would demand to contextualize them. Particularly relevant in this sense is Quentin Skinner and the so-called Cambridge School´s "discursive contextualist" proposal. However, it has recently come under severe criticism. Not only has the possibility of historically of recreating the various discursive contexts and getting rid of the “presentism” of our current perspectives and presuppositions been disputed. What is at stake is whether such a historicist vocation is really relevant for the correct understanding of the texts of the past. It would lead to ignore that transcendent dimension of discourses that allows them to become transposed from their original contexts of production and project forward into time. In the face of this criticisms, the present essay reaffirms the need to historically contextualize discourses as well as the perverse consequences, in methodological terms, implicit in the positions that deny it.
Downloads
References
ANKERSMIT, Frank R. Sublime historical experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
AUSTIN, John L. How to do thing with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
COLLINS, Randall. Sociology of philosophies: a global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard, 1998.
GORDON, Peter E. Contextualism and criticism in the history of ideas. In: MCMAHON, Darrin and MOYN, Samuel (eds.). Rethinking modern european intellectual history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
JAY, Martin. Genesis and validity: the theory and practice of intellectual history. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022.
LEFORT, Claude, Le travail de l'oeuvre Machiavel. Paris: Gallimard, 1986.
LESLIE, Margaret. In defense of anachronism. Political Studies, v. XVIII, n. 4, London, 1970.
POCOCK, John Greville Agard. Virtue, commerce and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
ROMANO, Claude. L’événement et le temps. París: Presses Universitaires de France, 2012.
ROMANO, Claude. L’événement et le monde. París: Presses Universitaires de France, 2021.
SKINNER, Quentin. History and Theory. n. 8, Middletown, 1969.
SKINNER, Quentin. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. In: Visions of politics I: regarding method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
SYRJÄMÄKI, Sami. Sins of a historian: perspectives on the problem of anachronism. Academic Dissertation – University of Tampere, Tampere, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos da licença Creative Commons, adotada a partir da ArtCultura, v. 21, n. 39 (jul.-dez. 2019).
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0: o artigo pode ser copiado e redistribuído em qualquer suporte ou formato. Os créditos devem ser dados ao autor original e mudanças no texto devem ser indicadas. O artigo não pode ser usado para fins comerciais. Caso o artigo seja remixado, transformado ou algo novo for criado a partir dele, ele não pode ser distribuído.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.