The Justice of the Present, the Crimes of the Past

an Analysis about the Crimes of the Dictatorships in Brazil and Argentina

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n1a2021-58952

Keywords:

Civil-Military Dictatorship, Memory of the Repression, Judiciary

Abstract

By the end of the civil-military dictatorships started in the Southern Cone during the Cold War, the traces of the political violence occurred under the application of the National Security Doctrine (NSD) begun to be faced. Just as the transition processes practiced in each context were different, so were the manners according to which the demands for memory, truth and justice came to be in each country. The present article analyzes the possibilities of recomposing the memory in the Brazilian and Argentinean cases, by identifying how the Judiciary has manifested itself in front of causes proposed by victims of repression, by their relatives or by human rights organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carlos Artur Gallo, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Doutor em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande 1 do Sul, com Estágio Doutoral realizado junto à Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología da Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Professor no Departamento de Sociologia e Política - DESP, e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Pelotas -UFPel. Coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da UFPel.

Alfredo Alejandro Gugliano, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutor em Ciência Política e Sociologia pela Universidade Complutense de Madri (Espanha). Professor do Departamento de Ciência Política e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Pesquisador do CNPq (PQ-2).

Published

2021-09-09

How to Cite

Gallo, C. A., & Gugliano, A. A. (2021). The Justice of the Present, the Crimes of the Past: an Analysis about the Crimes of the Dictatorships in Brazil and Argentina. Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 49(1), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n1a2021-58952