Rationale of Decisions in Special Courts
Analysis Against the Concept by art 489, §1º of the Civil Procedure Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n1a2021-54623Keywords:
Human rights, Code of Civil Procedure, Special Courts, Principle of Procedural Speed, Principle of Due Process of LawAbstract
The edition of the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, with influence on the constitutionalization of the law, brought adjustments aligned with the Constitution of the Republic. Prioritizing the quality of the statement
of reasons, it introduced in the Code of Civil Procedure Paragraph 1 of Article 489, listing exemplary hypotheses of an unsubstantiated decision. The objective of the present work was to verify the possibility of applying this new legislation in the system of Special Courts. The methodology applied is that of bibliographic research. The results, at first, pointed out that the understanding signed by the superior courts and part of the doctrine is inapplicable, justifying that Law 9.099/95 has its own system. However, it is recognized, in the end, in another part of the doctrine, that adequate judicial provision is possible only when the constitutional
guarantees of the principles of procedural speed and due process of law are duly safeguarded by the application of paragraph 1 of article 489 of the Code of Civil Procedure.