Recognition of the Active Participation of the Victim in the Criminal Process in the Light of Human Rights

Authors

  • Roberto Omar Galiano Universidad nacional de Rosario – Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n1a2021-51200

Keywords:

Complainant, Autonomy, Multiple accusations, Right of defense

Abstract

Currently, some classical notions of criminal and criminal procedural law have begun to be rethougth. Certain key concepts have entered into crisis. One of the main topics of great debate turns out to be the evolution towards a greater participation of the victim in the criminal process. This led to the generation of certain tension points or possible collisions between the constitutional guarantees of the different subjects
involved. Therefore, in the development of this work we will analyze the link between the victim´s participation in the criminal process and its eventual impact on the rights of the accused. To do this, in a briek way, we will make reference to certain nuclear aspects of this issue, and we will highlight pronouncements that we consider relevant issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, we will present out conclusions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roberto Omar Galiano, Universidad nacional de Rosario – Argentina

Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Nacional de Rosario – Argentina. Abogado, Magister en Derecho Procesal por la Universidad Nacional de Rosario (Argentina). Magister en seguridad jurídica y justicia penal en iberoamérica por la Universidad de Salamanca (España). Ayudante Fiscal de la provincia de San Juan, Argentina. Actualmente trabajando en la Tesis de la carrera de Doctorado en Derecho. Asistencia a cursos de especialización en la ciudad de Rosario, Buenos Aires y Salamanca (España).

Published

2021-09-07

How to Cite

Galiano, R. O. (2021). Recognition of the Active Participation of the Victim in the Criminal Process in the Light of Human Rights. Journal of the Faculty of Law of the Federal University of Uberlândia, 49(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.14393/RFADIR-v49n1a2021-51200